我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 人格测验中作假的控制方法(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2007年27卷04期
页码:
 78
栏目:
 心理统计与测量
出版日期:
 2007-12-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Methods of Coping with Faking of Personality Tests
作者:
 骆 方 张厚粲
 北京师范大学心理学院,北京100875
Author(s):
 Luo Fang Zhang Houcan
 Psychology College ,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875
关键词:
 作假社会称许性量表迫选式量表警告
Keywords:
 faking Social Desirability Scale forced -choice format scale warning2
分类号:
 B841·2
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 被试很容易对人格测验作假,这严重影响了人格测验的有效性。目前测评专家已经提出了一些应对作假的方法,它们可被分为事前控制技术和事后识别技术两大类。前者包括迫选式量表,警告及假渠道技术等,后者包括作假识别量表,IRT及反应时识别技术等。目前,在人格测验中嵌套使用作假识别量表,以及在测验指导语中加入警告是比较有效的两种方法,迫选式量表的发展也值得期待。由于研究者对作假的内部发生机制了解较少,这制约了IRT与反应时识别技术的发展。
Abstract:
 Personalitytests are easy to be faked and faking have adversely affected the validity of personality tests·Psychometrical specialistshave brought forward some methods to coping withfaking·Two main categories are distinguished ,which are the pro -preventing and post -de—tecting techniques·The former include forced -choice format scale ,warning ,bogus pipeline·The latter include detecting faking scale ,IRTandreaction-ti me detecting techniques·Nowdetecting faking scale nested in personalitytest and warning added inthe test direction are the moreeffective methods ,and the developing offorced -choice format scale will be good·Because researchers less knowthe inner generating mecha—nismoffaking ,it restricts the developing of IRTand reaction-ti me detecting techniques·

参考文献/References

 1 Nederhof AJ·Methods of coping with social desirability bias :Areview·European Journal of Social Psychology,1985,15:263-280·
2 Ellingson JE,Sackett P R ,Hough LM·Social desirability cor—rections in personality measurement :Issues of applicant compari—son and construct validity·Journal of Applied Psychology,1999,84:155-166·
3 Goffin R D,Christiansen N D.Correcting personality tests forfaking :Areviewof popular personalitytests and aninitial surveyof researchers .International Journal of Selection and Assess—ment ,2003,11(1):340-344·
4 Anderson CD,Warner JL,Spencer CC·Inflation bias in self-assessment examinations :Implications for valid employee selec—tion·Journal of Applied Psychology,1984,69:574-580·
5 Zickar M J,Drasgow F·Detecting faking using appropriatenessmeasurement·Applied Psychological Measurement ,1996,20:71-87·
6 Ferrendo PJ,Chico E·Detecting dissi mulationin personalitytestscores :Acomparison between person -fit indices and detectionscales·Educational and Psychological Measurement ,2001,61:997-1012·
7 Zickar MJ,Gibby R E,Robie C·Uncovering faking samples inapplicant ,incumbent ,and experi mental data sets :An applicationof mixed -model ItemResponse Theory·Organizational ResearchMethods ,2004,7(2):168-190·18
8 Bowen C,Martin BA,Hunt ST·Acomparison of ipsative andnormative approaches for ability to control faking in personalityquestionnaires·International Journal of Organizational Analysis ,2002,10(3):240-260·
9 Baron H.Strengths andli mitations ofipsative measurement .Jour—nal of Occupational &Organizational Psychology,1996,69(1):49-57·
10 Dwight SA,Donovan JJ·Do warnings not to fake reduce fak—ing ?Human Performance ,2003,16(1):1-23·
11 Ellingson JE.The viability of retesting and warnings for man—agingfaking tendencies .In:E.D.Heggestad(Chair),Ed .Prac—tical considerations fori mplementing personalitytestingin orga—nizations .Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of theSocietyfor Industrial and Organizational Psychology.Orlando ,FL,2003·
12 Ones DS,Viswesvaran C,Reiss A·Role of social desirabilityinpersonality testing for personnel selection:The red her—ring·Journal of Applied Psychology,1996,81:660-679·
13 Donovan JJ,Dwight S A,Hurtz G M·An assessment of theprevalence ,severity,and verifiability of entry -level applicantfaking usingthe randomizedresponse technique·Human Perfor—mance ,2003,16(1):81-106·
14 Stark S,Chernyshenko O S,Drasgow F·An IRTapproach toconstructing and scoring pairwise preference items involvingsti muli on different di mensions :The multi -unidi mensionalpairwise -preference model·Applied Psychological Measure—ment ,2005,29(3):184-203·

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 -
更新日期/Last Update:  2009-01-16