我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 自尊、归因方式与内疚和羞耻的关系研究(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2008年28卷04期
页码:
 57
栏目:
 社会与人格心理学
出版日期:
 2008-12-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
 A Study on the Relationship of Self-esteem and Attributional Style with Guilt and Shame
文章编号:
1003-5184(2008)04-0057-05
作者:
 樊召锋; 俞国良
 中国人民大学 心理研究所，北京 100872
Author(s):
 Fan Zhaofeng; Yu Guoliang
 Institute of Psychology,Renin University of China,Beijing 100872
关键词:
 内疚; 羞耻; 自尊; 归因方式
Keywords:
 guilt; shae; self-estee; attributional style
分类号:
 B848
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 通过对14名中学生施测问卷，建立自尊、归因方式与内疚和羞耻的结构方程模型。结果表明：1自尊与内疚和羞耻呈显著正相关，归因方式与内疚或羞耻呈显著负相关；2自尊是归因方式与内疚和羞耻之间的中介变量，归因方式对自尊的直接作用大于对内疚和羞耻的直接作用，对内疚和羞耻的间接作用大于直接作用；3个体对内疚事件更倾向于内归因，对羞耻事件更倾向于外归因。
Abstract:
 The present study investigated and analyzed 14 Middle school students using questionnaires and established the structure equation odel of self-estee and attributional style with guilt and shae The results indated that Self-estee had a significant positive correlation with guilt and shae, and attributional style had a significant negative correlation with guilt or shae Self-estee is the interediary variable of attributional style and guilt and shae, and the direct ipact of attributional style to self-estee is stronger than the direct ipact of attributional style to guilt and shae, and the indirect ipact of attributional style to guilt and shae is stronger than the direct ipact; Individual tends to use inner reasons to explain the guilt events, and tends to use external reasons to explain the shae events

参考文献/References

 1丛晓波自尊的本质研究博士论文东北师范大学,26
2钱铭怡,黄学军,肖广兰羞耻感与父母养育方式、自尊、成就动机、心理控制源的相关研究中国
临床心理学杂志,1999,(3):147-164
3erry MBurger人格心理学陈会昌,等译北京:中国轻工业出版社,2254-257
4钟杰,李波,钱铭怡自尊在大学生人格、羞耻感与心理健康模型中的作用研究中国临床心理学杂
志,22,(4):31-65
5朱荣春,王通理,钱铭怡大学生羞耻感和心理健康以及自我效能、自尊的相关研究中国心理卫生
杂志,1999,13(4):225-227
6刘永芳归因理论及其应用济南:山东人民出版社,199236-241
7Lewis BShae and guilt in neurosisNewYork:International Universities Press,1971
8Niedenthal P M,Tangney P,Gavanski L “If only weren’t” versus “If only I hadn’t”: Distinguishing shae and guilt in counterfactual thinkingournal of Personality and Social Psychology,1994,67:55-595
9[KG*3]Tangney PRecent advances in the epirical study of shae and guiltAerican Behavioral Scientists,1995,3():1132-1145
10Nita Lutwaka,acqueline Panisha,oseph FerraribShae and guilt:characterological vsbehavioral self-blae and their relationship to fear of intiacyPersonality and Individual Differences,23,(35):99-916
11欧阳佩仪小学儿童的自尊感与归因模式的关系及相关影响因素的探讨硕士论文华南师范大学,25
12施承孙,钱铭怡易羞耻者的归因方式和应对风格中国心理卫生杂志,199,12(4):193-195
13Qiao-ianzhong,Wang Beioffan’s virtual guilt theory-the progress of guilt study of psychological fieldChinese ournal of Clinical Rehabilitation,25,9(4):1-12
14汪向东,王希林,马弘心理卫生评定量表手册中国心理卫生杂志社,199931-32
15汪向东,王希林,马弘心理卫生评定量表手册中国心理卫生杂志社,199933-332
16温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,等中介效应检验程序及其应用心理学报,24,36(5):614-62
17亓圣华中学生羞耻感与身体锻炼之间的关系研究博士论文华东师范大学,26
18卢谢峰,韩立敏中介变量、调节变量与协变量——概念、统计检验及其比较心理科学,27,3(4):934-936
19augen R,Lund TAttributional style and its relation to other personality dispositionsThe British ournal of Educational Psychology,199,537-55

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 -
更新日期/Last Update:  2009-01-19