我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 “上下意象图式”对汉语成语感情色彩加工的影响(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2011年31卷02期
页码:
 143-148
栏目:
 认知心理学
出版日期:
 2011-03-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
 The Up-Down Image Schema Affects the Emotion Process of Chinese Idioms
作者:
 张积家;何本炫;陈栩茜
 华南师范大学 心理应用研究中心,广州 510631
Author(s):
 Zhang Jijia;He Benxuan;Chen Xuqian
 Center for Studies of Psychological Application,South China Normal University,Guangzhou 510631
关键词:
 上下意象图式成语感情色彩隐喻理论具身认知观。
Keywords:
 up-down image schemaword emotion colormetaphor theoryembodiment cognition view
分类号:
 B842.5
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 通过两个实验,考察了“上下意象图式”对汉语成语感情色彩加工的影响。实验一发现,成语感情色彩加工存在“隐喻一致效应”,褒义的成语呈现在屏幕上方加工得更快,贬义的成语呈现在屏幕下方加工得更快、更准。实验二消除了具体空间信息的影响,发现仅有抽象符号水平的联结,“上”、“下”概念不能影响汉语成语感情色彩的加工。研究结果支持隐喻理论和具身认知观。
Abstract:
 Two studies explored the influence of the up-down image schema on emotion process of Chinese idioms.Experiment 1 found that “metaphor congruency effect” exists in emotion process of the Chinese idioms.Experiment 2 eliminated the influence of spatial cues,with which the links between “up” and “down” concepts and emotion were more directly and clearly at notional level.The result showed that emotion process of the Chinese idioms were not affected by “up” and “down” concepts when they were only connected at notional level.It suggests that spatial information is necessary to the “metaphor congruency effect”.

参考文献/References

 1Lakoff G,Johnson M.Philosophy in the flesh-the embodied and its challenge to western thought.Chicago:Chicago University Press,1999. 2李其维.“认知革命”与“第二代认知科学”刍议.心理学报,2008,40(12):1306-1327. 3Barsalou L W.Perceptual symbol systems.Behavioral and Brain Sciences,1999,22:577-660. 4Glenberg A M,Robertson D A.Symbol grounding and meaning:A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning.Journal of Memory and Language,2000,43:379-401. 5Prinz J J.Furnishing the mind:Concepts and their perceptual basis.Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,2002. 6Wilson M.Six views of embodied cognition.Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,2002,9:625-636. 7鲁忠义,陈笕桥,邵一杰.语篇理解中动允性信息的提取.心理学报,2009,41(9):793-801. 8Zwaan R A.The immersed experience:toward an embodied theory of language comprehension.The Psychology of Learning and Motivation,2004,44:35-62. 9Wells G L,Petty R E.The effects of overt head movements on persuasion:Compatibility and incompatibility of responses.Basic and Applied Social Psychology,1980,1:219-230. 10Strack F,Martin L L,Stepper S.Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile:A nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1988,54:768-777. 11Schubert T W.Your highness:Vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2005,89:1-21. 12Kovecses Z.Metaphor and emotion:Language,culture,and body in human feeling.New York:Cambridge University Press,2000. 13Meier B P,Robinson M D.Why the sunny side is up:Associations between aVect and vertical position.Psychological Science,2004,15:243-247. 14Meier B P,Robinson M D.Does“feeling down”mean seeing down? Depressive symptoms and vertical selective attention.Journal of Research in Personality,2006,40:451-461. 15Meier B P,Robinson M D,Crawford L E,et al..When‘light’and‘dark’thoughts become light and dark responses:Affect biases brightness judgments.Emotion,2007,7:366-376. 16Stepper S,Strack F.Proprioceptive determinants of emotional and nonemotional feelings.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1993,64:211-220. 17Tracy J L,Robins R W.Show your pride:Evidence for a discrete emotion expression.Psychological Science,2004,15:194-197. 18Meier B P,Sellbom M,Wygant D B.Failing to take the moral high ground:Psychopathy and the vertical representation of morality.Personality and Individual Differences,2007,43:757-767. 19Robinson M D,Zabelina D L,Ode S,et al..The vertical nature of dominance-submission:Individual differences in vertical attention.Journal of Research in Personality,2008,42:933-948. 20Thompson E,Varela F J.Radical embodiment:Neural dynamics and consciousness.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2001,5(1):418-425. 21Boroditsky I.Metaphoric structuring:Understanding time through spatial metaphors.Cognition,2000,75:1-28. 22Weger U,Pratt J.Time flies like an arrow:Space-time compatibility effects suggest the use of a mental time-line.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2008,15:426-430. 23刘丽虹,张积家.时间的空间隐喻对汉语母语者时间认知的影响.外语教学与研究,2009,4:266-271. 24张积家,谢书书,和秀梅.语言和文化对空间认知的影响.心理学报,2008,40(7):774-787. 25Fodor J A.The modularity of mind.Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,1983. 26Collins A M,Loftus E F A.A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.Psychological Review,1975,82:407-428. 27Tucker M,Ellis R.On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance,1998,24:830-846. 28Lakoff G,Johnson M.Metaphors we live by.Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1980. 29Chao L L,Martin A.Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream.Neuroimage,2000,12:478-484. 30Simmons K,Barsalou L W.The similarity-in-topography principle:Reconciling theories of conceptual deficits.Cognitive Neuropsychology,2003,20:451-486. 31Glenberg A M,Kaschak M P.Grounding language in action.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2002,9:558-565. 32De Bruin E N M,van Lange P A M.What people look for in others:Influences of the perceiver and the perceived on information selection.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,2000,26:206-219. 33Wojciszke B.Multiple meanings of behavior:Construing actions in terms of competence and morality.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1994,67:222-232. 34Krebs D L.Morality:An evolutionary account.Perspectives on Psychological Science,2008,3:149-172. 35Hill P L,Lapsley D K.Persons and situations in the moral domain.Journal of Research in Personality,2009,43:245-246.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:国家重点基础研究发展计划“973”课题(2005CB522802),教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地项目(08JJOXLX269)。通讯作者:张积家,E-mail:Zhangjj@scnu.edu.cn。
更新日期/Last Update:  2011-10-31