进化心理学关于反乱伦情感的研究
《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]
- 期数:
- 2011年31卷03期
- 页码:
- 204-208
- 栏目:
- 理论心理学
- 出版日期:
- 2011-05-01
文章信息/Info
- Title:
- Studies of Anti-Incest Sentiments in Evolutionary Psychology
- 作者:
- 罗力群
- 华中师范大学 社会发展与社会政策研究中心，武汉 430079
- Author(s):
- Luo Liqun
- Center for Social Development & Social Policy，Central China Normal University，Wuhan 430079
- 分类号:
- B8409
- DOI:
- -
- 文献标识码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 本文评介了利伯曼等进化心理学者对人类反乱伦情感的研究。他们把人类乱伦退避机制纳入人类亲属识别机制的框架，认为数据支持这一理论框架，并且人类乱伦退避机制的发生不存在敏感期。文章主张把“是否有年龄差距在3岁以内的兄弟姐妹”纳入利伯曼等人的亲属识别框架，进一步检验敏感期是否存在；对进化心理学抱以宽容的态度或许更为合适；不宜用科学哲学思想排斥进化心理学。
- Abstract:
- This article reviews the studies of anti-incest sentiments by evolutionary psychologists of Lieberman et al.They put the mechanism of human incest avoidance into the framework of human kin detection architecture，arguing that their data strongly support that framework and that the initiation of the human incest avoidance mechanism does not have a sensitive period.This paper suggests that “whether or not a person has sibling(s)with an age difference within 3 years” should be added to Lieberman et al.’s framework and the sensitive period should be further tested.Also，this paper calls for toleration for evolutionary psychology and points out that it is inappropriate to reject the discipline with thoughts from scientific philosophy.
参考文献/References
1Lieberman D，Tooby J，Cosmides L.The evolution of human incest avoidance mechanism：An evolutionary psychological approach.In：Wolf A，Takala J.Eds.Evolution and the Moral Emotions：Appreciating Edward Westermarck，2003.
2Lieberman D，Tooby J，Cosmides L.Does morality has a biological basis? An empirical test of the factors governing moral sentiments regarding incest.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B,2003: 270，819-826. 3Lieberman D，Tooby J，Cosmides L.The architecture of human kin detection.Nature，2007：445，727-731. 4Supplementary information of the architecture of human kin detection，2007.Retrieved March 30，2010，from http：//www.nature.com/nature/journal/v445/n7129/suppinfo/nature05510.html.
5Wolf A.Sexual attraction and childhood association：a Chinese brief for Edward Westermarck.Stanford，CA：Stanford University Press，1995.
6Wolf A.Westermarck redivivus.In Annual Review of Anthropology，1993，22：157-175.
7Shepher J.Mate selection among second-generation kibbutz adolescents：incest avoidance and negative imprinting.Archives of Sexual Behavior，1971，1：293-307.
8Fessler D,Navarrete D.Third-party attitudes toward sibling incest：Evidence for Westermarck’s hypothesis.Evolution and Human Behavior，2004，25：277-294.
9库恩 T.科学革命的结构.金吾伦等译.北京：北京大学出版社，2005/1970：15-16.
10Holmes W.The early history of Hamiltonian-based research on kin recognition.Annales Zoologici Fennici，2004,41：691-711.
11Gerlach G，Lysiak N.Kin recognition and inbreeding avoidance in Zebrafish，Danio Rerio，is based on phenotype matching.In Animal Behaviour，2006，71：1371-1377.
12Wolf A.Explaining the Westermarck effect，or what did natural selection select for? In：Wolf A，Durham W.Eds.Inbreeding，incest，and the incest taboo：The state of knowledge at the turn of the century.Stanford：Stanford University Press，2004：76-92.
13Bowlby J.Attachment.New York：Basic Books，1982：356.
14Maccoby E.The two sexes：Growing up apart，coming together.Cambridge，MA & London：The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press，1998：19.
15Wolf A.Explaining the Westermarck effect，or what did natural selection select for? In：Wolf A，Durham W.Eds.Inbreeding，incest，and the incest taboo：The state of knowledge at the turn of the century.Stanford，CA：Stanford University Press，2004：76-92.
16Dawkins R.The oxford book of modern science writing.Oxford & New York：Oxford University Press，2008：103.
17李醒民.划界问题或科学划界.社会科学，2010，3：103-113.
18Popper K.Realism and the aim of science.London：Hutchinson Publishing Group，1983：159.
19波普尔 K.无尽的探索：卡尔·波普尔自传.邱仁宗译.南京：江苏人民出版社，2000/1992：177-182.
备注/Memo
- 备注/Memo:
- 基金项目：华中师范大学2010年度中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金探索创新项目(2010TS014)。
常用功能
统计/Statistics
- 摘要浏览/Viewed 2778
- 评论/Comments
