我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 人格测量:从累积式模型到展开式模型

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2011年31卷05期
页码:
 455-458
栏目:
 心理统计与测量
出版日期:
 2012-09-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Personality Assessment:From Dominance Model to Unfolding Model
作者:
 谢晶1方平1姜媛2
 1.首都师范大学 教育学院心理系,北京 100048;2.北京体育大学 运动心理学教研室,北京 100084
Author(s):
 Xie Jing1Fang Ping1Jiang Yuan2
 1.Department of Psychology,School of Education,Capital Normal University,Beijing 100048; 2.Division of Sport Psychology,Beijing Sport University,Beijing 100084
关键词:
 人格测量展开式模型理想点累积式模型
Keywords:
 personality assessmentunfolding modelideal-pointdominance model
分类号:
 B841.2
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 当前大多数人格测量都采用的是累积式反应模型方法,该模型假设被试在测验上的得分随其能力或特质提高而增加,但是随着人格测量技术的不断发展,这一模型的实施效果遭到了质疑,研究者们开始关注展开式模型,该模型认为被试的反应取决于被试能力和项目阈值的匹配程度,当被试能力与项目阈值完全匹配时,被试做出肯定回答的概率达到最高点,称之为“理想点”,展开式模型的目的就是找到被试的理想点,从而寻找其真正的态度强度或人格特质水平。GGUM作为一种比较成熟的展开式模型,已经开始应用于人格测量的各个领域,但仍需要进行大规模的试测,在评估和预测效度方面积累经验,建立业界认可的心理测量学标准,不断探讨和开发相应的心理测量理论和简便易行的统计程序。
Abstract:
 The majority of personality scales in use today were developed using dominance model,which assume that respondents with higher trait levels exhibit higher item scores than do those with low trait levels and that the probability of observing a high item score increases monotonically as the distance between person and item locations increases.shows that the probability of a positive response increases as a person lies increasingly distant and above the item’s location.But as personality assessment technology developed,the reliance on dominance assumptions and associated scale construction procedures has been queried.Researchers begin to pay attention to the unfolding model,which assume people respond positively to items that have locations similar to their own.In probabilistic terms,as the distance between a respondent’s location on the trait continuum(called his or her ideal point)and the item’s location increases,the probability of endorsing the item decreases.As a more mature model,GGUM has been used in many personality assessment fields,but still need to undertake large-scale test to accumulate experience of evaluation and forecast validity,establish an acknowledged psychometric norm,and continue to explore corresponding theory and simple statistical procedure.

参考文献/References

 1Goldberg L R.The structure of phenotypic personality traits.American Psychologist,1993,48:26-34.
2Ones D S,Viswesvaran C,Reiss A D.Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection:The red herring.Journal of Applied Psychology,1996,81:660-679.
3Stark S,Chernyshenko O S,Chan K Y,et al..Effects of the testing situation on item responding:Cause for concern.Journal of Applied Psychology,2001,86:943-953.
4Goldberg L R.International personality item pool:A scientific collaboratory for the development of advanced measures of personality and other individual differences.Retrieved May 20,2001,from http://ipip.ori.org/ipip,1998.
5Chernyshenko O S,Stark S,Drasgow F,et al..Constructing personality scales under the assumptions of an ideal point response process:Toward increasing the flexibility of personality measures.Psychological Assessment,2007,19(1):88-106.
6Stark S,Chernyshenko O S,Drasgow F,et al..Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment:should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring? Journal of Applied Psychological,2006,91(1):25-39.
7Chernyshenko O S,Stark S,Chan K Y,et al..Fitting item response theory models to two personality inventories:Issues and insights.Multivariate Behavioral Research,2001,36:523-562.
8Andrich D,Luo G.A hyperbolic cosine latent trait model for unfolding dichotomous single-stimulus responses.Applied Psychological Measurement,1993,17(3):253-276.
9Reise S P,Waller N G.Fitting the two-parameter model to personality data.Applied Psychological Measurement,1990,14:45-58.
10Roberts J S.Item response theory approaches to attitude measurement.Doctoral dissertation.University of South Carolina,Columbia,1995.
11Deng C P,Armstrong P I,Rounds J.The fit of Holland’s RIASEC model to U.S.occupations.Journal of Vocational Behavior,2007,71:1-22.
12Rounds J,Walker C M,Day S X,et al..O*net interest profiler:Reliability,validity,and self-scoring.Retrieved July 24,2007,from the O*NET Resource Center Web site:http://www.onetcenter.org/reports/IP_RVS.html,1999.
13Wall J E,Baker H E.The interest-finder:Evidence of validity.Journal of Career Assessment,1997,5:255-273.
14Tay L,Drasgow F,Rounds J,et al..Fitting measurement models to vocational interest data:Are dominance models ideal? Journal of Applied Psychology,2009,94(5):1287-1304.
15Mangos P M,Johnston J H.Applying unfolding item response theory to enhance measurement of cultural norms.Papers presented at the RTO human factors and medicine panel (HFM) symposium held in Copenhagen.Denmark,2008.
16Zampetakis L A.Unfolding the measurement of the creative personality.(in press).Journal of Creative Behavior,2010.
17郭庆科,苗金凤,王昭.IRT展开模型及对非累积反应机制的检测.心理学探新,2006,26(2):66-69.
18Roberts J S,Wedell D H,Laughlin J E.Heightened sensitivity of likert attitude scales to restriction of sample range.Paper presented at the 1998 American educational research association annual meeting.San Diego,California,1998.
19Roberts J S,Laughlin J E,Wedell D H,et al..Validity issues in the likert and thurstone approaches to attitude measurement.Educational and Psychological Measurement,1999,59(2):211-233.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:首都师范大学北京市“发展与教育心理学”重点学科,北京市“学习与认知”重点实验室,国家社会科学基金“十一五”规划课题(BBA090065)。 通讯作者:方平,E-mail:pfang2007@126.com。
更新日期/Last Update:  2011-11-01