我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 SWLS网络测验中可靠性变量的测量不变性检验(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2018年01期
页码:
 80-85
栏目:
 心理统计与测量
出版日期:
 2018-01-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Testing Measurement Invariance of Satisfaction with Life Scale(SWLS)based on the Multi-group Confirmatory Factor Analysis
文章编号:
1003-5184(2018)01-0080-06
作者:
 王道阳12刘争光2
 1.安徽师范大学教育科学学院,芜湖 241000; 2.北京师范大学中国基础教育质量监测协同创新中心,北京 100875
Author(s):
 Wang Daoyang12Liu Zhengguang2
 1.Department of Psychology,Anhui Normal University,Wuhu 241000; 2.Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment toward Basic Education Quality,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875
关键词:
 测量不变性 结构不变性 生活满意度量表
Keywords:
 Key words:measurement equivalence structural invariance SWLS
分类号:
 B841.2
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 测量不变性在自我报告问卷或量表的心理测量应用中非常重要,是跨组比较的前提条件。测量不变性检验模型包括无任何约束的分组验证性因素分析(Mgroup)、形态的不变性(M1)、负荷的不变性(M2)、截距的不变性(M3)、严格不变性(M4)、因子方差-协方差的不变性(M5)以及潜均值的不变性(M6)。以生活满意度量表(SWLS)为例,针对1343名大学生(年龄17-25岁,20.01±1.53),进行有急事需要处理(否vs.是),答题时感受(积极情绪vs.消极情绪),噪音水平(无噪音vs.有噪音),答题用时(长vs.短),性别(男vs.女),户口(非农业户口vs.农业户口)等不同组别的生活满意度量表(SWLS)完全因素不变性检验。结果表明:(1)是否有急事需要处理的不变性成立(Δχ2=0.49~10.59,p>0.05);(2)答题时感受不变性部分成立,M5、M6模型不变性不成立(Δχ2(1=3.96、20.89,p<0.05);(3)噪音水平不变性部分成立,M3与M4模型不变性检验不成立(Δχ2(4)=14.75,Δχ2(5)=23.91,p<0.05);(4)答题用时不变性不成立(Δχ2=11.01~41.95,均p<0.05);(5)性别的不变性部分成立,M4模型不变性检验不成立(Δχ2(5)=64.40,p<0.05);(6)户口的不变性部分成立,M6模型不变性检验不成立(Δχ2(1)=11.49,p<0.05)。
Abstract:
 Abstract:Measurement Invariance is important in the psychometric application of self-report scale or questionare,which is a prerequisite for cross-group comparison.As an popular method to analyze Measurement Invariance,multi-group confirmatory factor analysis contains various theoritical models,and has different combination of models in application.The current study systemetically summarized these relative theoritical models and then proposed several models for testing Factorial Invariance,including confirmatory factor analysis across groups without any limitation(Mgroup); Configural Invariance Model(M1); Metric Invariance Model(M2); Scalar Invariance Model(M3); Strict Invariance Model(M4); Factor Variance / Covariance Invariance Model(M5); Latent Mean Invariance Model(M6).The study took the Satisfaction With Life Scale(SWLS)as an example,with the subjects of 1343 college students(age:17-25,20.01±1.53),to test SWLS Measurement Invariance according to different groups as below:In a hurry or not(Hurry vs.No-hurry),Mood in the test(Positive mood vs.Negative mood),Noise or not(Noise vs.Non-noise),Response time(Long response time vs.Short response time),Gender(Male vs.Female),Hukou(Agricultural vs.Non-agricultural).The results show that:a)Factorial Invariance is tenable across the Hurry group and No-hurry group(Δχ2=0.49~10.59,p>0.05); b)Partial Factorial Invariance is tenable across the Positive mood group and Negative mood group,with M5 Invariance Model and M6 Invariance Model untenable(Δχ2(1)=3.96,20.89,p<0.05); c)Partial Factorial Invariance is tenable across the Noise group and Non-noise group,with M3 Invariance Model and M4 Invariance Model untenable(Δχ2(4)=14.75,Δχ2(5)=23.91,p<0.05); d)Factorial Invariance is tenable across the Long response time group and Short response time group(Δχ2=11.01~41.95,p<0.05); e)Partial Factorial Invariance is tenable across the Male group and Female group,with M4 Invariance Model untenable(Δχ2(5)=64.40,p<0.05); f)Partial Factorial Invariance is tenable across the Rural group and Non-rural group,with M6 Invariance Model untenable(Δχ2(1)=11.49,p<0.05).

参考文献/References

 [1]蔡华俭,林永佳,伍秋萍,严乐,黄玄凤.(2008).网络测验和纸笔测验的测量不变性研究——以生活满意度量表为例.心理学报,40(2),228-239.
[2]Byrne,B.M.,Shavelson,R.J.,& Muthén,B.(1989).Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures:The issue of partial measurement invariance.Psychological Bulletin,105(3),456-466.
[3]Cheung,G.W.,& Rensvold,R.B.(2002).Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance.Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal,9(2),233-255.
[4]Cieciuch,J.,Davidov,E.,Oberski,D.L.,& Algesheimer,R.(2015).Testing for measurement invariance by detecting local misspecification and an illustration across online and paper-and-pencil samples.European Political Science,14(4),521-538.
[5]Curran,P.J.,West,S.G.,& Finch,J.F.(1996).The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis.Psychological Methods,1(1),16-29.
[6]Davis,R.N.(1999).Web-based administration of a personality questionnaire:Comparison with traditional methods.Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers A Journal of the Psychonomic Society Inc,31(4),572-577.
[7]Diener,E.,Emmons,R.A.,Larsen,R.J.,& Griffin,S.(1985).The satisfaction with life scale.Journal of Personality Assessment,49(1),71-75.
[8]Diener,E.,Suh,E.M.,Lucas,R.E.,& Smith,H.L.(1999).Subjective well-being:Three decades of progress.Psychological Bulletin,125(2),276-302.
[9]Dodou,D.,& Winter,J.C.F.D.(2014).Social desirability is the same in offline,online,and paper surveys:A meta-analysis.Computers in Human Behavior,36(36),487-495.
[10]Fournier,J.,Gaudreau,P.,Demontrond-Behr,P.,Visioli,J.,Forest,J.,& Jackson,S.(2007).French translation of the Flow State Scale-2:Factor structure,cross-cultural invariance,and associations with goal attainment.Psychology of Sport and Exercise,8(6),897-916.
[11]Hardre,P.L.,Crowson,H.M.,& Xie,K.(2012).Examining Contexts-of-Use for Web-Based and Paper-Based Questionnaires.Educational & Psychological Measurement,72(6),1015-1038.
[12]Hauk,S.(2015).A Comparison of Web-based and Paper-and-Pencil Homework on Student Performance in College Algebra.Primus Problems Resources & Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies,25(1),61-79.
[13]Lewis,M.I.,Watson,B.,& White,K.M.(2009).Internet versus paper-and-pencil survey methods in psychological experiments:Equivalence testing of participant responses to health-related messages.Australian Journal of Psychology,61(2),107-116.
[14]Meade,A.W.,& Lautenschlager,G.J.(2004).A Monte-Carlo Study of Confirmatory Factor Analytic Tests of Measurement Equivalence/Invariance.Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal,11(1),60-72.
[15]Meade,A.W.,Lautenschlager,G.J.,& Michels,L.C.(2007).Are Internet and Paper-and-Pencil Personality Tests Truly Comparable?An Experimental Design Measurement Invariance Study.Organizational Research Methods,10(10),322-345.
[16]Raffaelli,M.,Armstrong,J.,Tran,S.P.,Griffith,A.N.,Walker,K.,& Gutierrez,V.(2016).Focus on Methodology:Beyond paper and pencil:Conducting computer-assisted data collection with adolescents in group settings.Journal of Adolescence,49,1-9.
[17]Vandenberg,R.J.,& Lance,C.E.(2000).A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature:Suggestions,practices,and recommendations for organizational research.Organizational Research Methods,3(1),4-70.
[18]Wang,K.T.,Yuen,M.,& Slaney,R.B.(2009).Perfectionism,depression,loneliness,and life satisfaction a study of high school students in Hong Kong.The Counseling Psychologist,37(2),249-274.
[19]Widaman,K.F.,& Reise,S.P.(1997).Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments:Applications in the substance use domain.The Science of Prevention:Methodological Advances from Alcohol and Substance Abuse Research,(9),281-324.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:国家社会科学基金教育学青年课题(CBA120108)。 通讯作者:刘争光,E-mail:zhengguang_liu@126.com。
更新日期/Last Update:  2018-01-15