我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 心理学研究的可重复性“危机”:一些积极应对策略(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2018年01期
页码:
 86-90
栏目:
 心理统计与测量
出版日期:
 2018-01-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
 The Replication Crisis in Psychological Research:The Solution of it
文章编号:
1003-5184(2018)01-0086-05
作者:
 刘 佳 霍涌泉 陈文博 解诗薇 王 静
 陕西师范大学心理学院,陕西省行为与认知神经科学重点实验室,西安 710062
Author(s):
 Liu Jia Huo Yongquan Chen Wenbo Xie Shiwei Wang Jing
 School of Psychology,Shaanxi Normal University,Shaanxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Behavior and Cognitive Neuroscience,Xi'an 710062
关键词:
 心理学 可重复性问题 偏差 惯例操作
Keywords:
 Key words:psychology replication problem bias routine operation
分类号:
 B841.2
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 研究结果的可重复性不高是目前心理学研究面临的一个较为普遍的现象,造成这种情况不仅是由于人类心理与行为的复杂性及实验操作、环境等无关变量的影响,排除个别学术不端行为,许多研究者偏差性的操作也是影响可重复性的重要原因。由于一些偏差性操作可能已经被当成研究惯例,因而有必要明确具体操作来源并据此提出解决策略,为促进心理学界关于研究程序、数据分析、结果呈现等操作惯例的转变提供参照。
Abstract:
 Abstract:The “Replication Crisis” is a common phenomenon in psychological research.Except for a few academic misconducts,this situation results not only from the complication of psychological phenomenon and the influence of extraneous variables,but also from biased manipulations during the research procedure.These biased manipulations improve the chances of researchers finding publishable results,and makes the reported relations are stronger or otherwise more supportive of the researcher's theories than they would be.Some of these procedures are performed so often that they are considered to be routine operations,so that many researchers are unaware that the procedures may be problematic.Methodologists have proposed a number of solutions to reduce the prevalence of problematic procedures.Researchers could increased disclosure of studies,or increase the sample size of studies,or supplement the procedure of null hypothesis significance testing(NHST).It is also needed the leading of professionals and the support of expert journals.Besides,researchers could replicate the original studies to ensure that observed findings are not biased.The final solution to this problem is to change the academic atmosphere of psychological science.Changing the academic atmosphere is incredibly difficult and it needs every researcher to work together.

参考文献/References

 [1]陈巍.(2014).可重复性:盘旋在具身认知实验室上方的“幽灵”.心理技术与应用,(1),23-25.
[2]郭春彦,朱滢.(1997).传统统计方法面临的挑战:元分析方法.心理学报,29(2),130-136.
[3]胡传鹏,王非,过继成思,宋梦迪,隋洁,彭凯平.(2016).心理学研究中的可重复性问题:从危机到契机.心理科学进展,24(9),1504-1518.
[4]焦璨,张敏强.(2014).迷失的边界:心理学虚无假设检验方法探究.中国社会科学,(2),148-163.
[5]吕小康.(2012).Fisher与Neyman-Pearson的分歧与心理统计中的假设检验争议.心理科学,35(6),1502-1506.
[6]吕小康.(2014).从工具到范式:假设检验争议的知识社会学反思.社会,35(6),216-236.
[7]吴艳,温忠麟.(2011).与零假设检验有关的统计分析流程.心理科学,34(1),230-234.
[8]郑昊敏,温忠麟,吴艳.(2011).心理学常用效应量的选用与分析.心理科学进展,19(12),1868-1878.
[9]仲晓波.(2015).心理学实验的可重复性.心理科学,38(4),807-812.
[10]仲晓波,黄希尧,万荣根.(2008).心理学中对假设检验一些批评的分析.心理科学,31(4),1010-1013.
[11]朱滢.(2016).“开放科学数据共享软件共享”,你准备好了吗?心理科学进展,(6),995-996.
[12]朱滢,伍锡洪.(2016).《科学》和《自然》杂志2015年的两篇心理学文章.心理科学,38(2),474-478.
[13]Alkhateeb,A.(2016).We should not accept scientific results that have not been repeated.Retrieved from.http://nautil.us/blog/we-should-not-accept-scientific-results-that-have-not-been-repeated.
[14]Decoster,J.,Sparks,E.A.,Sparks,J.C.,Sparks,G.G.,& Sparks,C.W.(2015).Opportunistic biases:Their origins,effects,and an integrated solution.American Psychologist,70(6),499-514.
[15]Dienes,Z.(2011).Bayesian versus orthodox statistics:Which side are you on?Perspectives on Psychological Science,6(3),274-290. Eich,E.(2014).Business not as usual.Psychological Science,25(1),3-6.
[16]Gewin,V.(2016).Data sharing:An open mind on open data.Nature,529(7584),117-119.
[17]John,L.K.,Loewenstein,G.,& Prelec,D.(2012).Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling.Psychological Science,23(5),524-532.
[18]Lindsay,D.S.(2015).Replication in psychological science.Psychological Science,26(12),1827-1832.
[19]Open Science Collaboration.(2015).Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.Science,349(6251),aac4716.
[20]Pashler,H.,& Wagenmakers,E.J.(2012).Editors' Introduction to the special section on replicability in psychological science:A crisis of confidence?Perspectives on Psychological Science,7(6),528-530.
[21]Reproducibility Project & the Psychology Group.(2014).Reproducibility Project:Psychology.
[22]Schimmack,U.(2012).The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles.Psychological Methods,17(4),551-566.
[23]Schmidt,S.(2009).Shall we really do it again?The powerful concept of replication is neglected in the social sciences.Review of General Psychology,13(2),90-100.
[24]Schooler,J.W.(2014).Metascience could rescue the 'replication crisis'.Nature, 515(7525),9.
[25]Simmons,J.P.,Nelson,L.D.,& Simonsohn,U.(2011).False-positive psychology undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant.Psychological Science,22(11),1359-1366.
[26]Simmons,J.P.,Nelson,L.D.,& Simonsohn,U.(2012).A 21 Word Solution.http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2160588.
[27]Spies,J.,& Nosek,B.(2014).Open science framework.Retrieved http://open science framework.org/
[28]Van Assen,M.A.,van Aert,R.C.,Nuijten,M.B.,& Wicherts,J.M.(2014).Why publishing everything is more effective than selective publishing of statistically significant results.Plos One,9(1),e84896.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 通讯作者:陈文博,E-mail:cwbpsy@snnu.edu.cn。 解诗薇 王 静
更新日期/Last Update:  2018-01-15