可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:
[1]陈巍.(2014).可重复性:盘旋在具身认知实验室上方的“幽灵”.心理技术与应用,(1),23-25.
[2]郭春彦,朱滢.(1997).传统统计方法面临的挑战:元分析方法.心理学报,29(2),130-136.
[3]胡传鹏,王非,过继成思,宋梦迪,隋洁,彭凯平.(2016).心理学研究中的可重复性问题:从危机到契机.心理科学进展,24(9),1504-1518.
[4]焦璨,张敏强.(2014).迷失的边界:心理学虚无假设检验方法探究.中国社会科学,(2),148-163.
[5]吕小康.(2012).Fisher与Neyman-Pearson的分歧与心理统计中的假设检验争议.心理科学,35(6),1502-1506.
[6]吕小康.(2014).从工具到范式:假设检验争议的知识社会学反思.社会,35(6),216-236.
[7]吴艳,温忠麟.(2011).与零假设检验有关的统计分析流程.心理科学,34(1),230-234.
[8]郑昊敏,温忠麟,吴艳.(2011).心理学常用效应量的选用与分析.心理科学进展,19(12),1868-1878.
[9]仲晓波.(2015).心理学实验的可重复性.心理科学,38(4),807-812.
[10]仲晓波,黄希尧,万荣根.(2008).心理学中对假设检验一些批评的分析.心理科学,31(4),1010-1013.
[11]朱滢.(2016).“开放科学数据共享软件共享”,你准备好了吗?心理科学进展,(6),995-996.
[12]朱滢,伍锡洪.(2016).《科学》和《自然》杂志2015年的两篇心理学文章.心理科学,38(2),474-478.
[13]Alkhateeb,A.(2016).We should not accept scientific results that have not been repeated.Retrieved from.http://nautil.us/blog/we-should-not-accept-scientific-results-that-have-not-been-repeated.
[14]Decoster,J.,Sparks,E.A.,Sparks,J.C.,Sparks,G.G.,& Sparks,C.W.(2015).Opportunistic biases:Their origins,effects,and an integrated solution.American Psychologist,70(6),499-514.
[15]Dienes,Z.(2011).Bayesian versus orthodox statistics:Which side are you on?Perspectives on Psychological Science,6(3),274-290.
Eich,E.(2014).Business not as usual.Psychological Science,25(1),3-6.
[16]Gewin,V.(2016).Data sharing:An open mind on open data.Nature,529(7584),117-119.
[17]John,L.K.,Loewenstein,G.,& Prelec,D.(2012).Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling.Psychological Science,23(5),524-532.
[18]Lindsay,D.S.(2015).Replication in psychological science.Psychological Science,26(12),1827-1832.
[19]Open Science Collaboration.(2015).Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.Science,349(6251),aac4716.
[20]Pashler,H.,& Wagenmakers,E.J.(2012).Editors' Introduction to the special section on replicability in psychological science:A crisis of confidence?Perspectives on Psychological Science,7(6),528-530.
[21]Reproducibility Project & the Psychology Group.(2014).Reproducibility Project:Psychology.
[22]Schimmack,U.(2012).The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles.Psychological Methods,17(4),551-566.
[23]Schmidt,S.(2009).Shall we really do it again?The powerful concept of replication is neglected in the social sciences.Review of General Psychology,13(2),90-100.
[24]Schooler,J.W.(2014).Metascience could rescue the 'replication crisis'.Nature, 515(7525),9.
[25]Simmons,J.P.,Nelson,L.D.,& Simonsohn,U.(2011).False-positive psychology undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant.Psychological Science,22(11),1359-1366.
[26]Simmons,J.P.,Nelson,L.D.,& Simonsohn,U.(2012).A 21 Word Solution.http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2160588.
[27]Spies,J.,& Nosek,B.(2014).Open science framework.Retrieved http://open science framework.org/
[28]Van Assen,M.A.,van Aert,R.C.,Nuijten,M.B.,& Wicherts,J.M.(2014).Why publishing everything is more effective than selective publishing of statistically significant results.Plos One,9(1),e84896.