«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:

 2018年05期

页码:

 427-432

栏目:

 认知心理学

出版日期:

 2018-09-30

文章信息/Info

Title:

 The Influence of Divided Attention on Definition-based Unitized Encoding

作者:

 王宝玺 程 琛 胡竹菁 向 玲

 江西师范大学心理学院,南昌 330022

Author(s):

 Wang Baoxi Cheng Chen Hu Zhujing Xiang Ling

 School of Psychology,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang 330022

关键词:

 定义一体化;  注意分心;  记忆编码;  联结记忆

Keywords:

 definition-based unitization;  divided attention;  memory encoding;  associative memory

分类号:

 B842.5

DOI:

 -

文献标识码:

 A

摘要:

 通过考察编码阶段注意分心对定义一体化条件下联结记忆成绩的影响,探究定义一体化编码对注意资源的依赖程度。使用注意分心范式,在记忆编码过程操作无分心、奇偶分心和大小分心条件,比较不同注意条件下的联结记忆成绩。结果发现:与无分心条件相比,定义一体化下的联结记忆成绩在两种分心条件下没有显著变化,而造句下的联结记忆成绩在两种分心条件下显著降低。当前发现表明了定义一体化编码较少依赖于注意资源,这深化了对定义一体化编码机制的认识。

Abstract:

 The present study explored whether attention influenced the unitized representation during the encoding phase via a divided-attention paradigm.Participants were asked to study unrelated word pairs as new concepts in the definition condition or as separated lexical units in the sentence condition.Meanwhile the participants were instructed to perform both the divided attention with odd/even decision task and the divided attention with large/small task.The results showed that there was no significant group difference in the definition condition,suggesting that two types of divided attention have no influence on definition-based unitized representation during encoding phase.However,two types of divided attention group exhibited significantly worse performance than the full attention group in the sentence condition,suggesting that divided attention disrupted association representation during encoding phase,leading to a decline in familiarity based associative memory performance.The results showed that two types of divided attention have no influence on associative memory performance under the definition condition,but leading to significant decline in associative memory performance in sentence condition.These findings revealed that definition-based unitized encoding depend on the attentional resources to a lesser extent,which clarify the issue about the cognitive process of definition-based unitized encoding.

参考文献/References

 刘源.(1990).现代汉语常用词词频词典.北京:宇航出版社.
徐慧芳,张钦,郭春彦.(2015).情绪效价和唤醒对熟悉性和回想的不同影响.心理科学,38(2),263-269.
郑志伟,李娟,肖凤秋.(2015).熟悉性能够支持联结记忆:一体化编码的作用.心理科学进展,23(2),202-212.
Ahmad,F.N.,Hockley,W.E.(2014).The role of familiarity in associative recognition of unitized compound word pairs.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,67(12),1-55.
Ahmad,F.N.,Myra,F.,& Hockley,W.E.(2015).Improving associative memory in older adults with unitization.Aging Neuropsychology & Cognition,22(4),1-21.
Bader,R.,Mecklinger,A.,Hoppstadter,M.,& Meyer,P.(2010).Recognition memory for one-trial-unitized word pairs:Evidence from event-related potentials.Neuroimage,50(2),772-781.
Bastin,C.,Diana,R.A.,Simon,J.,Collette,F.,Yonelinas,A.P.,& Salmon,E.(2013).Associative memory in aging:The effect of unitization on source memory.Psychology and Aging,28(1),275-283.
Castel,A.D.,& Craik,F.I.(2003).The effects of aging and divided attention on memory for item and associative information.Psychology and Aging,18(4),873-885.
Fernandes,M.A.,& Moscovitch,M.(2000).Divided attention and memory:Evidence of substantial interference effects at retrieval and encoding.Journal of Experimental Psychology General,129(2),155-176.
Kirchhoff,B.,Anderson,B.,Barch,D.,& Jacoby,L.(2012).Cognitive and neural effects of semantic encoding strategy training in older adults.Cerebral Cortex,22(4),788-799.
Naveh-Benjamin,M.,Guez,J.,& Marom,M.(2003).The effects of divided attention at encoding on item and associative memory.Memory and Cognition,31(7),1021-1035.
Naveh-benjamin,M.,Guez,J.,Hara,Y.,Brubaker,M.S.,& Lowenschusserlich,I.(2014).The effects of divided attention on encoding processes under incidental and intentional learning instructions:Underlying mechanisms?The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,67(9),1682-1696.
Nieznański,M.(2013).Effects of resource demanding processing on context memory for context-related versus context-unrelated items.Journal of Cognitive Psychology,25(6),745-758.
Parkin,A.J.,Gardiner,J.M.,& Rosser,R.(1995).Functional aspects of recollective experience in face recognition.Consciousness and Cognition,4(4),387-398.
Quamme,J.R.,Yonelinas,A.P.,& Norman,K.A.(2007).Effect of unitization on associative recognition in amnesia.Hippocampus,17(3),192-200.
Rugg,M.D.,& Curran,T.(2007).Event-related potentials and recognition memory.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,11(6),251-257.
Snodgrass,J.G.,& Corwin,J.(1988).Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory:Applications to dementia and amnesia.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,117(1),34-50.
Troyer,A.K.,& Craik,F.I.(2000).The effect of divided attention on memory for items and their context.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale,54(3),161-171.
Turk,D.J.,Bradyvan,D.B.M.,Collard,P.,Gillespiesmith,K.,Conway,M.A.,& Cunningham,S.J.(2013).Divided attention selectively impairs memory for self-relevant information.Memory & Cognition,41(4),503-510.
Yonelinas,A.P.(2002).The nature of recollection and familiarity:A review of 30 years of research.Journal of Memory & Language,46(3),441-517.
Yonelinas,A.P.,Aly,M.,Wang,W.C.,& Koen,J.D.(2010).Recollection and familiarity:Examining controversial assumptions and new directions.Hippocampus,20(11),1178-1194.
Zheng,Z.,Li,J.,Xiao,F.,Ren,W.,& He,R.(2016).Unitization improves source memory in older adults:An event-related potential study.Neuropsychologia,89,232-244.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

 基金项目:江西省教育科学“十二五”规划重点课题(15ZD3LYB010)。
通讯作者:向玲,E-mail:xiangling1997@126.com。

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update:  2018-09-30