我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 东西方文化的人性观差异及其对道德认知的影响(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2019年01期
页码:
 34-39
栏目:
 认知心理学
出版日期:
 2019-01-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Differences in the View of Human Nature between Eastern and Western Cultures and Its Influence on Moral Cognition
文章编号:
1003-5184(2019)01-0034-06
作者:
 吴言动 王 非 彭凯平
 (清华大学心理学系,北京 100084)
Author(s):
 Wu Yandong Wang Fei Peng Kaiping
 (Department of Psychology,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084)
关键词:
 常人理论;  人性观;  性善论;  性恶论;  禁止性道德;  规范性道德
Keywords:
 lay theory;  view of human nature;  theory of original goodness of human nature;  theory of original evil of human nature;  prohibitive morality;  normative morality
分类号:
 B842.5
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 人性观,即认为人性究竟是本善的还是本恶的,不仅是哲学思辨的焦点,也是日常生活中形成的一种常人理论(lay theory)。对于东西方文化传统的检视表明,西方文化占主导地位的是性恶论人性观,东方文化占主导地位的则是性善论人性观。研究通过实证数据支持了这一结论,发现中国被试相对于美国被试,对于人性的主观评定更倾向于性善的一端(研究1)。这种人性观差异导致中国被试在道德方面,尤其是规范性道德(行善)方面,对人提出了更高的要求(研究1),并且这种因果关系得到了启动实验的支持(研究2)。这些研究结果有助于人们更好地理解文化如何塑造了人们对于人性和道德的看法。
Abstract:
 The view of human nature—that is,whether human nature is good or evil—is not only the focus of philosophy but also a lay theory formed in daily life.Review of Chinese and Western cultures shows that Western culture is dominated by the theory of the original evil of human nature while Eastern culture is dominated by the theory of the original goodness of human nature.This study supported its conclusion through empirical data and found that Chinese participants subjective evaluations of human nature was more inclined toward goodness than American participants(Study 1).This difference in the view of human nature led to higher requirements for Chinese people in terms of morality,especially normative morality(good deeds)(Study 1),and this causal relationship was supported by a priming experiment(Study 2).These findings help us to better understand how culture shapes people's perceptions of human nature and morality.

参考文献/References

 王登峰,崔红.(2008).心理社会行为的中西方差异:“性善-性恶文化” 假设.西南大学学报(社会科学版),34(1),1-7. Bedford,O.,& Hwang,K.-K.(2003).Guilt and shame in chinese culture:A cross-cultural framework from the perspective of morality and identity.Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior,33(2),127-144. Carver,C.S.(2006).Approach,avoidance,and the self-regulation of affect and action.Motivation and Emotion,30(2),105-110. Carver,C.S.,& Scheier,M.F.(1998).On the self-regulation of behavior(pp.20-23).New York:Cambridge University Press. Elliot,A.J.,Chirkov,V.I.,Kim,Y.,& Sheldon,K.M.(2001).A cross-cultural analysis of avoidance(relative to approach)personal goals.Psychological Science,12(6),505-510. Greenwald,A.G.,& Farnham,S.D.(2000).Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,79(6),1022-1038. Greenwald,A.G.,McGhee,D.E.,& Schwartz,J.L.(1998).Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition:The implicit association test.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,74(6),1464-1480. Hamamura,T.,Meijer,Z.,Heine,S.J.,Kamaya,K.,& Hori,I.(2009).Approach-avoidance motivation and information processing:A cross-cultural analysis.Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin,35(4),454-462. Heine,S.J.,Kitayama,S.,Lehman,D.R.,et al.(2001).Divergent consequences of success and failure in Japan and North America:An investigation of self-improving motivations and malleable selves.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,81,599-615. Hong,Y.Y.,Levy,S.R.,& Chiu,C.Y.(2001).The contribution of the lay theories approach to the study of groups.Personality and Social Psychology Review,5(2),98-106. Janoff-Bulman,R.(2011).Conscience:The do's and don'ts of moral regulation.The Social Psychology of Morality:Exploring the Causes of Good and Evil,131-148. Janoff-Bulman,R.,& Leggatt,H.(2002).Culture and social obligation:When “shoulds” are perceived as “wants”.Journal of Research in Personality,36,260-270. Janoff-Bulman,R.,Sheikh,S.,& Hepp,S.(2009).Proscriptive versus prescriptive morality:Two faces of moral regulation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,96,521-537. Krettenauer,T.,& Jia,F.(2013).Investigating the actor effect in moral emotion expectancies across cultures:A comparison of Chinese and Canadian adolescents.British Journal of Developmental Psychology,31(3),349-362. Ma-Kellams,C.,Spencer-Rodgers,J.,& Peng,K.(2011).I am against us?Unpacking cultural differences in ingroup favoritism via dialecticism.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,37(1),15-27. Markus,H.R.,& Kitayama,S.(1991).Culture and the self:Implications for cognition,emotion,and motivation.Psychological Review,98(2),224-253. Miller,J.G.,& Bersoff,D.M.(1994).Cultural influences on the moral status of reciprocity and the discounting of endogenous motivation.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,20(5),592-602. Miller,J.G.,Bersoff,D.M.,& Harwood,R.L.(1990).Perceptions of social responsibilities in India and in the United States:Moral imperatives or personal decisions?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,58(1),33-47. Nosek,B.A.,& Banaji,M.R.(2001).The go/no-go association task.Social Cognition,19(6),625-666. Polman,E.,Pettit,N.C.,& Wiesenfeld,B.M.(2013).Effects of wrongdoer status on moral licensing.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,49(4),614-623. Rotter,J.B.(1967).A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust.Journal of Personality,35(4),651-665. Wrightsman,L.(1964).Measurement of philosophies of human nature.Psychological Reports,14,743-751. Wrightsman,L.(1966).Personality and attitudinal correlates of trusting and trustworthy behaviors in a two-person game.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,4,328-332. Wrightsman,L.(1991).Assumptions about Human Nature.New York:Sage.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 通讯作者:彭凯平,E-mail:pengkp@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn。
更新日期/Last Update:  2019-01-20