我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 全国高考英语试题的城乡项目功能差异分析(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2019年01期
页码:
 64-69
栏目:
 心理统计与测量
出版日期:
 2019-01-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
 A Study on the Urban/Rural DIF Evaluation of the NMET
文章编号:
1003-5184(2019)01-0064-06
作者:
 关丹丹 乔 辉 陈 康 韩奕帆
 (教育部考试中心,北京 100084)
Author(s):
 Guan Dandan Qiao Hui Chen Kang Han Yifan
 (National Educational Examinations Authority,Beijing 100084)
关键词:
 高考英语;  项目功能差异;  城乡
Keywords:
 National Matriculation English Test;  differential item function;  urban/rural
分类号:
 B841.2
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 本研究主要目的是针对高考英语成绩存在的城乡差异,检验这种差异是否来源于试题在城乡上的项目功能差异。如果两个能力本来相同的考生群体在某一试题得分上表现出不同程度的差异,该试题就存在项目功能差异。研究采用试题标准化分数差法,利用STDIF软件逐一分析了2016年三套全国高考英语卷的客观题是否存在城乡上的项目功能差异,在确定客观题没有项目功能差异后,以客观题成绩为匹配变量,采用条件得分图法对书面表达题是否存在城乡上的项目功能差异进行了分析。研究结果显示,高考英语全国I、II、III卷均未发现城乡上的项目功能差异试题,即可以认为高考英语全国卷对城乡不同户籍考生都非常公平、公正,城乡考生在英语成绩上的差异并非题目的公平性所致。
Abstract:
 The purpose of this study is to analyze test fairness of the 2016 National Matriculation English Test(NMET)through conducting differential item function(DIF)analyses.If the responses of two groups of students with the same level of language ability differ on a common item,then the item owns DIF values,which means the item poses different level of difficulty for the two groups.The descriptive statistics indicated that there was significant difference in NMET scores between urban test-takers and rural test-takers.The standardization approach was applied to assess the three NMET papers focusing on urban/rural test-takers by using STDIF software which can detect both uniform DIF and non-uniform DIF.DIF is also investigated for a single writing item using the conditional P-value method.The result shows that no DIF values were found in the three NMET papers between urban and rural test-takers,suggesting that the score difference between the groups could not be attributed to DIF.

参考文献/References

 国务院.(2014).国务院关于深化招生考试制度改革的实施意见.http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2014-09/04/content_9065.htm 李清华.(2016).语言测试的公平性检验框架.现代外语,4,549-561. 杨志明.(2017).考试公平性之题目及试卷功能差异探析.教育测量与评价,9,5-12. 余跃,杜文久,周娟,秦菊香.(2016).LP 方法及其与三种常用DIF 检测方法的比较.心理科学,39(3),720-726. 张龙,涂冬波.(2015).多级计分题项目功能差异常用检测方法及比较.江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),39(5),441-448. 曾秀芹,孟庆茂.(1999).项目功能差异及其检测方法.心理学动态,7(2),41-47. Allalouf,A.,& Abramzon,A.(2008).Constructing better second language assessments based on differential item functioning analysis.Language Assessment Quarterly,5(2),120-141. Buzick,H.,& Stone,E.(2017).Recommendations for Conducting Differential Item Functioning(DIF)Analyses for Students with Disabilities Based on Previous DIF Studies[R/OL].[2017-08-11].http://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RR-11-34.pdf. Camilli,G.(2006).Test fairness.In R.L.Linn(Ed.),Educational measurement(4th ed.,pp.220-256).Westport,CT:American Council on Education. Dorans,N.J.,& Holland,P.W.(1993).DIF detection and description:Mantel-Haenszel and standardization.In P.W.Holland & H.Wainer(Eds.),Differential item functioning(pp.35-66).Hillsdale,NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum. Ferne,T.,& Rupp,A.(2007).A Synthesis of 15 Years of Research on DIF in Language Testing:Methodological Advances,Challenges,and Recommendations.Language Assessment Quarterly,4(2),113-148. Lee,Y-W.,Breland,H.,& Muraki,E.(2005).Comparability of TOEFL CBT writing prompts for different native language groups.International Journal of Testing,5,131-158. Zenisky,A.L.,Hambleton,R.K.,& Robin,F.(2003).Detection of differential item functioning in largescale state tests:A study evaluating a two-stage approach.Educational and Psychological Measurement,63,51-64. Zenisky,A.L.,Hambleton,R.K.,& Robin,F.(2004).DIF Detection and Interpretation in Large-Scale Science Assessments:Informing Item Writing Practices.Educational Assessment,9(1-2),61-78. Zenisky,A.L.,Robin,F.,& Hambleton,R.K.(2016).Differential Item Functioning Analyses with STDIF:User's Guide[Version 6/15/2009].Available from:Ronald K Hambleton.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目: 全国教育科学规划单位资助教育部规划课题《新高考改革背景下的高考质量评价研究》(FBB160604)阶段性研究成果之一。
更新日期/Last Update:  2019-01-20