我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 矛盾年龄偏见量表在中国大学生群体中的修订及信效度检验(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2022年02期
页码:
 171-177
栏目:
 心理统计与测量
出版日期:
 2022-04-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Ambivalent Ageism Scale in Chinese Undergraduates
文章编号:
1003-5184(2022)02-0171-07
作者:
 吴洪翔; 宋意霞; 吴文峰
 (贵州师范大学心理学院,贵阳 550025)
Author(s):
 Wu Hongxiang Song Yixia Wu Wenfeng
 (School of Psychology,Guizhou Normal University,Guiyang 550025)
关键词:
 矛盾年龄偏见量表;  信度;  效度;  测量等值;  大学生
Keywords:
 the Ambivalent Ageism Scale;  reliability;  validity;  measurement invariance;  Chinese undergraduates
分类号:
 B841.2
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 目的:修订矛盾年龄偏见量表(the Ambivalent Ageism Scale,AAS),并在中国大学生群体中进行信、效度检验。方法:对1182名大学生施测AAS中文翻译版,探索并验证其因子结构,分析信、效度和测量等值性。其中347人还完成老化知识量表(FAQ)和容纳他人量表(AOS),用以检验AAS中文版的校标关联效度。另有74人在4周后重测AAS中文版。结果:AAS中文修订版包含认知帮助/保护、不想要的帮助和敌意年龄偏见三因子,总量表和各维度的Cronbach's α系数依次为0.83、0.80、0.85、0.76,重测信度依次为0.78、0.62、0.78、0.71。AAS中文修订版及各维度与FAQ和AOS负相关(r=-0.23～-0.48,ps<0.001)。验证因素分析表明AAS中文修订版的拟合良好(χ2/df=3.51,CFI=0.96,TLI=0.94,RMSEA=0.07,SRMR=0.05)。且该量表跨性别形态、弱等值、部分强等值和部分严格测量等值成立。结论:修订后的矛盾年龄偏见量表(AAS)中文版的信、效度良好,具备跨性别的测量部分等值性,可以用于测量中国大学生的矛盾年龄偏见。
Abstract:
 Objective:to test the reliability and validity the Ambivalent Ageism Scale(AAS)in Chinese undergraduates.Methods:1182 undergraduates completed AAS.The criteria-related validity was tested with the Acceptance of Others Scale(AOS)and Facts on Aging Quiz(FAQ)by 347 students.After 4 weeks,74 students were tested for test-retest reliability.Results:the Chinese Version of AAS contains three factors:cognitive assistance/protection,unwanted help,and hostile ageism.The internal consistency reliabilities of them were 0.83,0.80,0.85 and 0.76,and the test-retest reliabilities were 0.78,0.62,0.78,and 0.71.The AAS and three factors were correlated with the acceptance of others and the facts on aging.The CFA proved that AAS had good fit structure.In addition,the configural,metric,scalar and partial strict invariance of the model across gender was verified.Conclusion:The Chinese version of the Ambivalent Ageism Scale has good reliability and validity,and the results of AAS can be contrasted across genders of Chinese undergraduate.

参考文献/References

 贾锟,季红,于洁,宋菲菲.(2020).养老机构护理员对老年人态度的研究进展.护理研究,34(23),4191-4194.
潘登,马诗浩,王优,叶建梅,张静静,吴文峰.(2019).压力信念量表在中国大学生群体中的信效度检验.中国临床心理学杂志,27(4),722-725.
彭小凡,罗长群,王颖,尹桂玲.(2020).亲密关系体验-关系结构量表(ECR-RS)中文版测评大中学生的效度和信度.中国心理卫生杂志,34(11),957-963.
苏双,潘婷婷,刘勤学,陈潇雯,王宇静,李明月.(2014).大学生智能手机成瘾量表的初步编制.中国心理卫生杂志,28(5),392-397.
汪向东,王希林,马弘.(1999).心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版).北京:中国心理卫生杂志社.
温忠麟,黄彬彬,汤丹丹.(2018).问卷数据建模前传.心理科学,41(1),204-210.
吴帆.(2008a).青年人眼中的老年人:一项关于老年歧视问题的调查.青年研究,(7),24-29.
吴帆.(2008b).认知、态度和社会环境:老年歧视的多维解构.人口研究,(4),57-65.
朱宇航,郭继志,罗盛,李敏,胡善菊,董毅.(2016).简易应对方式问卷在老年人群体中的修订及信效度检验.中国卫生统计,33(4),660-664.
Ayalon,L.(2018).Perceived age discrimination:A precipitator or a consequence of depressive symptoms?The Journals of Gerontology:Series B,73(5),860-869.
Ayalon,L.,Dolberg,P.,Mikulioniene,S.,Perek-Biaas,J.,Rapoliene,G.,Stypinska,J.,...dela Fuente-Nunez,V.(2019).A systematic review of existing ageism scales.Ageing Research Reviews,54,100919.
Butler,R.N.(1969).Age-ism:Another form of bigotry.The Gerontologist,9(4),243-246.
Cary,L.A.,Chasteen,A.L.,& Remedios,J.(2017).The ambivalent ageism scale:Developing and validating a scale to measure benevolent and hostile ageism.The Gerontologist,57(2),e27-e36.
Fraboni,M.,Saltstone,R.,& Hughes,S.(1990).The Fraboni Scale of Ageism(FSA):An attempt at a more precise measure of ageism.Canadian Journal on Aging,9(1),56-66.
Hehman,J.A.,& Bugental,D.B.(2015).Responses to patronizing communication and factors that attenuate those responses.Psychology and Aging,30(3),552-560.
Horhota,M.,Chasteen,A.L.,& Crumley-Branyon,J.J.(2019).Is ageism acceptable when it comes from a familiar partner?The Journals of Gerontology:Series B,74(4),595-599.
Kogan,N.(1961).Attitudes toward old people:The development of a scale and an examination of correlates.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,62,44-54.
Lyons,A.,Alba,B.,Heywood,W.,Fileborn,B.,Minichiello,V.,Barrett,C.,et al.(2017).Experiences of ageism and the mental health of older adults.Aging & Mental Health,22(11),1456-1464.
Palmore,E.(2001).The ageism survey:First findings.The Gerontologist,41(5),572-575.
Tasdemir,N.(2020).Young group identification and motives as predictors of ageism,aging anxiety,and life satisfaction.Journal of Genetic Psychology,181(5),375-390.
Wang,C.C.,Liao,W.C.,Kuo,P.,Yuan,S.C.,Chuang,H.L.,Lo,H.C.,...Yen,C.H.(2010).The Chinese version of the facts on aging quiz scale:Reliability and validity assessment.International Journal of Nursing Studies,47(6),742-752.
Weiss,D.,& Zhang,X.(2020).Multiple sources of aging attitudes:Perceptions of age groups and generations from adolescence to old age across China,Germany,and the United States.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,51(6),407-423.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:贵州省哲学社会科学规划课题“易地扶贫搬迁户社区认同与新环境适应的耦合机制及其实现路径研究”前期成果(21GZZD40)。
通讯作者:吴文峰,E-mail:wwfhsd@aliyun.com。
更新日期/Last Update:  2022-04-20