我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 名词短语加工中个体量词通达的影响因素(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2022年04期
页码:
 313-321
栏目:
 认知心理学
出版日期:
 2022-08-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Influencing Factors of Individual Classifiers Access in Noun Phrase Processing
文章编号:
1003-5184(2022)04-0313-09
作者:
 王佳佳 匡玉英 张积家
 (中国人民大学心理学系,北京 100872)
Author(s):
 Wang Jiajia Kuang Yuying Zhang Jijia
 (Department of Psychology,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872)
关键词:
 个体量词;  量词的名词搭配量;  名词的量词拥有量;  量词-名词定配率;  词汇通达
Keywords:
 individual classifier;  amount of noun collocation of classifier;  amount of classifier possession of noun;  cloze probability;  lexical access
分类号:
 B842.5
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 “双系统”和“双向选择组合网络”理论认为,在汉语使用者的心理词典中存在名词系统和量词系统,两者之间存在双向选择关系。采用启动范式考察在名词短语产生和理解中量词的名词搭配量、名词的量词拥有量和量词-名词定配率对个体量词通达的影响。结果表明,量词的名词搭配量、名词的量词拥有量和量词-名词定配率显著地影响量词的词汇通达,量词和名词之间是双向选择关系。量词通达是直接通达和间接通达的有机结合。
Abstract:
 According to the theory of “dual-systems” and “dual-selection combination network”,there is a bidirectional selection relationship between the system of nouns and the system of classifiers in the mental lexicon of Chinese speakers.The present study investigated the effects of the amount of noun collocation of classifiers,the amount of classifier possession of nouns and cloze probability on the access of classifiers during the production and comprehension of noun phrases by using the priming paradigm.The results showed that the amount of noun collocation of classifiers,the amount of classifier possession of nouns and cloze probability had a significant influence on the lexical access of Chinese classifiers,and the relationship between classifiers and nouns was a bidirectional selection relation.The present study shows that the lexical access of classifiers is an organic combination of direct access and indirect access.

参考文献/References

 郭先珍.(1987).现代汉语量词手册.北京:和平出版社.
何杰.(2000).现代汉语量词研究.北京:民族出版社.
金天飞.(1985).琐谈量词的修辞作用.语文教学,(3),38-40.
倪宝元.(1984).量词的选择.中国语文,(5),361-365.
邵敬敏.(1993).量词的语义分析及其与名词的双向选择.中国语文,234(3),181-188.
舒华,程元善,张厚粲.(1989).235个图形的命名一致性、熟悉性、表象一致性和视觉复杂性评定.心理学报,21(4),389-396.
王均裕.(1983).谈量词的超常搭配.语言文学,(1),29-31.
王黎,郭佳,毕彦超,舒华.(2006).汉语名词短语产生中的量词一致性效应.心理与行为研究,4(10),34-38.
姚宗唐.(1985).数量词使用的艺术.文科通讯,(3),82-88.
张积家,刘红艳.(2009).言语产生和理解中汉语个体量词的通达.心理学报,41(7),580-593.
张启睿,舒华,刘友谊.(2011).汉语个体量词认知研究述评.心理科学进展,19(4),510-520.
周芍.(2006).名词量词组合的双向选择研究及其认知解释(博士学位论文).暨南大学,广州.
朱德熙.(2014).语法讲义.北京:商务印书馆.
Ahrens,K.(1994).Classifier production in normals and aphasics.Journal of Chinese Linguistics,22(2),202-247.
Chan,S.H.(2019).An elephant needs a head but a horse does not:An ERP study of classifier-noun agreement in mandarin.Journal of Neurolinguistics,52.
Chou,C.J.,Huang,H.W.,Lee,C.L.,& Lee,C.Y.(2014).Effects of semantic constraint and cloze probability on Chinese classifier-noun agreement.Journal of Neurolinguistics,31,42-54.
Federmeier,K.D.,Wlotko,E.W.,De Ochoa-Dewald,E.,& Kutas,M.(2007).Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing.Brain Research,1146(1),75-84.
Petten,C.V.,& Kutas,M.(1990).Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials.Memory & Cognition,18(4),380-393.
Qian,Z.Y.,& Garnsey,S.M.(2016).A sheet of coffee:An event-related brain potential study of the processing of classifier-noun sequences in English and Mandarin.Language,Cognition and Neuroscience,31(6),761-784.
Srinvasan,M.(2010).Do classifiers predict differences in cognitive processing?A study of nominal classifcation in Mandarin Chinese.Language and Cognition,2(2),177-190.
Zhang,N.(2013).Classifier structures in Mandarin Chinese.Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter.
Zhang,S.,& Schmitt,B.(1998).Language-dependent classification:The mental representation of classifiers in cognition,memory,and adevaluations.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Applied,4(4),375-385.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 通讯作者:张积家,E-mail:zhangjj1955@163.com。
更新日期/Last Update:  2022-12-30