我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 社会善念测量范式的本土化探索及信效度检验(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2023年01期
页码:
 90-96
栏目:
 心理统计与测量
出版日期:
 2023-03-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Development and Validation of the Chinese Version of the Social Mindfulness Paradigm
文章编号:
1003-5184(2023)01-0090-07
作者:
 田 一1; 王 莉2; 许 燕3; 焦丽颖4
 (1.北京教育科学研究院基础教育教学研究中心,北京 100036; 2.北京体育大学心理学院,北京 100048; 3.北京师范大学心理学部,应用实验心理北京市重点实验室,心理学国家级实验教学示范中心(北京师范大学),北京 100875; 4.北京林业大学人文社会科学学院心理学系,北京 100083)
Author(s):
 Tian Yi1; Wang Li2; Xu Yan3; Jiao Liying4
 (1.Pedagogic Research Center for Basic Education,Beijing Academy of Educational Sciences,Beijing 100036; 2.School of Psychology,Beijing Sport University,Beijing 100048; 3.Beijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology,National Demonstration Center for Experimental Psychology Education (Beijing Normal University),Faculty of Psychology,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875; 4.Department of Psychology,School of Humanities and Social Sciences,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083)
关键词:
 社会善念测量范式;  本土化;  信效度
Keywords:
 social mindfulness paradigm;  Chinese version;  reliability and validity
分类号:
 B841.2
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 社会善念是一种个体所具备的良好品质,在人际互动情境中表现为:能感知他人状态、尊重对方选择,同时愿意做出选择权的让渡。其测量范式源于笔选择范式,研究以经典社会善念测量范式为基础,从物品处理、偏好控制、稀缺刺激三个方面,探索本土化社会善念测量范式。结果表明,最终形成的社会善念测量范式三具有良好的信效度,为社会善念的跨文化测量和研究起到奠基性作用。
Abstract:
 Social mindfulness refers to the good qualities of an individual,which is reflected in the situation of interpersonal interaction,being able to perceive the state of others,being willing to respect the other's choices and make goodwill to transfer the rights.The Social Mindfulness Paradigm(SoMi)is a classic paradigm for measuring social mindfulness,which originates from the pen-choice paradigm.Based on the classical social mindfulness paradigm,the study explored the localized social mindfulness paradigm from three aspects:goods processing,preference control and scarcity stimulation.The results showed that the final social mindfulness paradigm III had better reliability and validity,and played a fundamental role in the cross-cultural measurement and research of social mindfulness.

参考文献/References

 陈满琪.(2016).社会正念及其与道德关系的研究.中国社会心理学评论,(1),151-164.
陈琪,陈冰,刘来,赵玉芳,吴宗辉.(2020).催产素对社会善念的提升作用.心理科学,43(3),712-717.
陈雅姣.(2019).感知社会正念和心理距离对大学生信任修复的影响(硕士学位论文).上海师范大学.
仇不凡.(2019).藏族学生的社会善念及合作行为研究(硕士学位论文).河北师范大学.
窦凯,刘耀中,王玉洁,聂衍刚.(2018a).“乐”于合作:感知社会善念诱导合作行为的情绪机制.心理学报,50(1),101-114.
窦凯,聂衍刚,王玉洁,刘耀中.(2018b).信任还是设防?互动博弈中社会善念对合作行为的促进效应.心理科学,41(2),390-396.
窦凯.(2016).感知社会正念:有效促进合作行为的心理机制(博士学位论文).暨南大学.
刘嘉.(2018).社会阶层对社会正念的影响:合作/竞争的作用(硕士学位论文).宁夏大学.
戎幸,孙炳海,黄小忠,蔡旻颖,李伟健.(2010).人际反应指数量表的信度和效度研究.中国临床心理学杂志,18(2),158-160.
田一,王莉,许燕,焦丽颖.(2021).中国人社会善念的心理结构.心理学报,53(9),1003-1017.
杨翠.(2020).女大学生感知社会善念对合作表现及脑间活动同步的影响(硕士学位论文).武汉体育学院.
张凤凤,董毅,汪凯,詹志禹,谢伦芳.(2010).中文版人际反应指针量表(IRI-C)的信度及效度研究.中国临床心理学杂志,18(2),155-157.
Benet-Martínez,V.,& John,O.P.(1998).Los cinco grandes across cultures and ethnic groups:Multitrait-multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,75(3),729-750.
Davis,M.H.(1983).Measuring individual differences in empathy:Evidence for a multidimensional approach.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,44(1),113-126.
Dou,K.,Wang,Y.J.,Li,J.B.,Li,J.J.,& Nie,Y.G.(2018).Perceiving high social mindfulness during interpersonal interaction promotes cooperative behaviours.Asian Journal of Social Psychology,21(1-2),97-106.
Hashimoto,H.,Li,Y.,& Yamagishi,T.(2011).Beliefs and preferences in cultural agents and cultural game players.Asian Journal of Social Psychology,14(2),140-147.
Higgins,E.T.(1998).Promotion and prevention:Regulatory focus as a motivational principle.In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology(Vol.30,pp.1-46).Academic Press.
Kim,H.,& Markus,H.R.(1999).Deviance or uniqueness,harmony or conformity?A cultural analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,77(4),785-800.
Lee,K.,& Ashton,M.C.(2018).Psychometric properties of the HEXACO-100.Assessment,25(5),543-556.
Lockwood,P.,Jordan,C.H.,& Kunda,Z.(2002).Motivation by positive or negative role models:Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,83(4),854.
Mischkowski,D.,Thielmann,I.,& Glöckner,A.(2018).Think it through before making a choice?Processing mode does not influence social mindfulness.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,74,85-97.
Murphy,R.O.,Ackermann,K.A.,& Handgraaf,M.J.J.(2011).Measuring social value orientation.Judgment and Decision Making,6(8),771-781.
Van Doesum,N.J.(2016).Social mindfulness.Ipskamp drukkers BV.
Van Doesum,N.J.,de Vries,R.E.,Blokland,A.A.J.,Hill,J.M.,Kuhlman,D.M.,Stivers,A.W.,...Van Lange,P.A.M.(2020).Social mindfulness: Prosocial the active way.Journal of Positive Psychology,15(2),183-193.
Van Doesum,N.J.,Murphy,R.O.,Gallucci,M.,Aharonov-Majar,E.,Athenstaedt,U.,Au,W.T.,...Buchan,N.R.(2021).Social mindfulness and prosociality vary across the globe.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,118(35),1-9.
Van Doesum,N.J.,Van Lange,D.A.W.,& Van Lange,P.A.M.(2013).Social mindfulness:Skill and will to navigate the social world.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,105(1),86-103.
Van Doesum,N.J.,Van Prooijen,J.W.,Verburgh,L.,& Van Lange,P.A.M.(2016).Social hostility in soccer and beyond.Plos One,11(4),1-13.
Van Lange,P.A.M.,& Van Doesum,N.J.(2015).Social mindfulness and social hostility.Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences,3(4),18-24.
Yamagishi,T.,& Yamagishi,M.(1994).Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan.Motivation and Emotion,18(2),129-166.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:国家自然科学基金面上项目(31671160),贵阳孔学堂阳明心学与当代社会心态研究院重大课题(KXTXT201601),国家社会科学基金重大项目(19ZDA363)。
通讯作者:许燕,E-mail:xuyan@bnu.edu.cn。
更新日期/Last Update:  2023-03-20