我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 激进生成论及其反表征主义革命(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2018年01期
页码:
 3-8
栏目:
 理论心理学
出版日期:
 2018-01-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Radical Enactivism and Its Anti-Representationalist Revolution
文章编号:
1003-5184(2018)01-0003-06
作者:
 叶浩生 杨文登
 广州大学心理与脑科学研究中心,广州 510006
Author(s):
 Ye Haosheng Yang Wendeng
 Center for Psychology and Brain Science,Guangzhou University,Guangzhou 510006
关键词:
 激进生成论 自创生生成论 感觉运动生成论 具身认知 表征主义
Keywords:
 Key words:radical enactivism autopoietic enactivism sensorimotor enactivism embodied cognition representationalism
分类号:
 B8409
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 生成论是当代具身认知科学中的一个新取向。它反对传统认知科学中的表征主义观点,主张心智并非认识者对环境信息的表征和加工,而是行动的制造者,是特定身体构造和身体能力的行动者与环境的互动与耦合过程。激进生成论认为自创生的生成论和感觉运动的生成论在反对表征主义方面过于“温和”。因此,它主张“激进化”生成论,强调基本心智就是一种反应形式,不包含任何内容性心理表征。因此,它要掀起一场反表征主义“革命”。这一激进主张受到来自左右两方面的批评。
Abstract:
 Abstract:Enactivism is a new approach in embodied cognition science.It takes an attitude of anti-representationalism and hold that the task of our mind is not the processing of mental representations and abstract symbols,instead mind's primary work is to make actions to adjust itself to its environment.Cognitive processes are simply not in the business of accessing the world in order to build accurate pictures of it.Cognition is an embodied action and deeply rooted in the body's interactions with the world.Radical enactivism is trying to radicalize the proposals of enactivism and attempt to improve and unify anti-representationalis approaches to mind and cognition.However,radical enactivism takes issue with autopoietic and sensorimotor enactivism which incur implicit commitment to representationalist doctrines they aim to supplant.The arguments of radical enactivism are being seviouly criticized by both moderate enactivisms and really radical enactivism.

参考文献/References

 [1]叶浩生.(2017).具身认知—原理与应用.北京:商务印书馆.
[2]叶浩生.(2013).认知与身体:理论心理学的视角.心理学报,45(4),481-488.
[3]叶浩生.(2015).心理学与身体:经典传统与现代取向.心理学探新,35(8),1-6.
[4]Brentano,F.(1784/2015).Psychology from an empirical standpoint.Forword,Tim Crane.
[5]Di Paolo,E.A.,Rohde,M.,& DeJaegher,H.(2011).Horizons for the enactive mind:Values,social interaction,and play.In J.Stewart,O.Gapenne,& E.A.Di Paolo(Eds.),Enaction:Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science(pp.33-87).Cambridge,MA:The MIT Press.
[6]Gärtner,K.,& Clowes,R.W.(2017).Enactivism,radical enactivism and predictive Processing:What is Radical in Cognitive 8Science?Journal f Philosophy & Science,18(1),54-83.
[7]Hutto,D.D.(2015).REC:Revolution effected by clarification.Topoi,1-15.
[8]Hutto,D.,& Myin,E.(2013).Radicalizing enactivism:Basic mind without content.MA:MIT Press.
[9]Hutto,D.,& Myin,E.(2017).Evolving enactivism:Basic mind meetcontent.MA:MIT Press.
[10]Kandel,E.(2001).The molecular biology of memory storage:A dialogue between genes and synapses.Science,294,1030-1038.
[11]O'Regan,J.K.,& Noё,A.(2001).A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness.Behavioral and Brain Sciences,24,939-973.
[12]Schlosser,M.E.(2017).Embodied cognition and temporally extended agency.Syntheses,Published online:03,forthcoming.
[13]Searle,J.(2009).Chinese room argument.Scholarpedia,4(8),3100.
[14]Thompson,E.(2007).Mind in life:Biology,phenomenology,and the science of mind.Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press.
[15]van den Herik,J.C.(2014).Why radical enactivism is not radical enough:A case for really radical enactivism.Unpublished Master's thesis.University of Rotterdam.
[16]Varela,F.J.,Thomson,E.,& Rosch,E.(1991).The embodied mind:Cognitive science and human experience.Cambridge,MA:The MIT Press.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:广东省基础研究与应用研究重大项目(2016WZDXM022)。 通讯作者:杨文登,E-mail:yangwendeng@163.com。
更新日期/Last Update:  2018-01-15