我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 世界大学排名比较中的再认启发式和线索推断(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2018年02期
页码:
 136-141
栏目:
 认知心理学
出版日期:
 2018-03-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Recognition Heuristic and Inference from Cues in Comparison Tasks on World University Ranking
文章编号:
1003-5184(2018)02-0136-06
作者:
 高山川 王 燕
 复旦大学心理学系,上海 200433
Author(s):
 Gao Shanchuan Wang Yan
 Department of Psychology,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433
关键词:
 再认启发式;  线索效度;  非补偿性策略;  世界大学排名
Keywords:
 Key words:recognition heuristic;  cue validity;  noncompensatory strategy;  world university ranking
分类号:
 B842.5
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 针对三种世界大学排名比较任务(综合实力、商业与管理专业、农业与林业专业),用问卷调查了208名大学生并考察其利用再认启发式和额外线索作推断的情况。结果发现:(1)被试在前两种任务中的正确率均超过60%,选择可再认学校的比率及其正确率也较高;(2)比较类别对再认的选择率及其正确率均有显著影响,效应量很大;(3)再认效度较低或无法利用再认时,被试的选择在不同程度上符合外国线索或专长线索的预测;(4)多出一条不利线索时,再认选择率比只有再认线索时有所降低但不低于50%,多出一条有利线索时,再认选择率的变化因线索而异,不一定显著地增加。
Abstract:
 Abstract:In a sample of 208 Chinese college students,this study investigated how these participants made inference from recognition information and other available cues using three different kinds of paired-comparison tasks on world university ranking,namely,ranking by overall performance,ranking by the subject of Business & Management and ranking by the subject of Agriculture & Forestry.Results showed that,for the former two tasks,the overall accuracy was more than 60% and both the proportion of choices of recognized universities and the percentage of correct inferences were rather high.Meanwhile,there were significant differences in the proportion of choices of recognized ones and the percentage of correct inferences as well across the three kinds of tasks with varied recognition validity.It was also found that participants' choices were mostly in line with the predictions of other information indicated by the title of a university,such as locating overseas or specializing in the subject relevant to specific reference class among the comparisons where recognition was correlated low with criterion or didn't discriminate.Moreover,participants chose the recognized universities less often but the proportion was not lower than 50% among the pairs with one negative value on either of the aforementioned additional cues.As for the pairs with one positive cue value,the overseas cue didn't affect the choices of recognized ones whereas the speciality cue did.

参考文献/References

 胡竹菁,戴海琦.(2017).心理学实验研究的效果大小.心理学探新,37(1),70-77. 刘敏,张庆林.(2006).推理的再认启发模式研究.心理科学,29(6),1354-1358. 刘强,潘鹏飞,王玉清.(2015).变革中的大学学科排名——QS 世界大学学科排名最新进展与反思.比较教育研究,311(12),35-41. 王长旺.(2008).大学排名现象分析及应对方案.当代教育论坛,(4),72-73. Arkes,H.R.,Gigerenzer,G.,& Hertwig,R.(2016).How Bad Is Incoherence?Decision,3,20-39. Borges,B.,Goldstein,D.G.,Ortmann,A.,& Gigerenzer,G.(1999).Can ignorance beat the stock market?In G.Gigerenzer,P.M.Todd,& the ABC Research Group,Simple heuristics that make us smart(pp.59-72).New York:Oxford University Press. Gaissmaier,W.,& Marewski,J.N.(2011).Forecasting elections with mere recognition from small,lousy samples:A comparison of collective recognition,wisdom of crowds,and representative polls.Judgment and Decision Making,6,73-88. Gigerenzer,G.,& Goldstein,D.G.(2011).The recognition heuristic:A decade of research.Judgment and Decision Making,6,100-121. Goldstein,D.G.,& Gigerenzer,G.(2002).Models of ecological rationality:The recognition heuristic.Psychological Review,109,75-90. Herzog,S.M.,& Hertwig,R.(2011).The wisdom of ignorant crowds:Predicting sport outcomes by mere recognition.Judgment and Decision Making,6,58-72. Oeusoonthornwattana,O.,& Shanks,D.R.(2010).I like what I know:Is recognition a non-compensatory determiner of consumer choice?Judgment and Decision Making,5,310-325. Oppenheimer,D.(2003).Not so fast!(and not so frugal!):Rethinking the recognition heuristic.Cognition,90,B1-B9. Pachur,T.,Bröder,A.,& Marewski,J.N.(2008).The recognition heuristic in memory-based inference:Is recognition a non-compensatory cue?Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,21,183-210. Pohl,R.F.(2011).On the use of recognition in inferential decision making:An overview of the debate.Judgment and Decision Making,6,423-438.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:上海市教委教研室项目(KC03JC02201603)。 通讯作者:高山川,E-mail:tracygao@fudan.edu.cn。
更新日期/Last Update:  2018-03-15