我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 社会面子意识、冲突处理策略与人际关系满意度(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2018年06期
页码:
 527-533
栏目:
 社会心理学
出版日期:
 2018-11-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Relation of Consciousness of Social Face and Conflict Resolution Strategies with Interpersonal Satisfaction in Chinese Students
文章编号:
1003-5184(2018)06-0527-07
作者:
 梁凤华1段锦云2
 1.上饶师范学院教育科学学院,上饶 334001; 2.苏州大学心理学系,教育部人文社科重点研究基地-苏州大学中国特色城镇化研究中心,苏州 215123
Author(s):
 Liang Fenghua1Duan Jinyun2
 1.School of Education Sciences,ShangRao Normal University,ShangRao 334001; 2.Department of Psychology,Key Research Institute of Education Ministry-Center for Chinese Urbanization Studies,Soochow University,Suzhou 215123
关键词:
 社会面子意识 冲突处理策略 人际关系满意度
Keywords:
 consciousness of social face conflict resolution strategies interpersonal satisfaction
分类号:
 B848
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 以大学生为对象,采取整群取样的方式,研究了大学生社会面子意识、冲突处理策略与人际关系满意度之间的关系。结果,大学生社会面子意识与人际关系满意度呈显著负相关,社会面子意识与协作策略呈显著负相关,协作式冲突处理策略与人际关系满意度呈显著正相关; 协作型冲突处理策略能正向预测大学生人际关系满意度,社会面子意识负向预测人际关系满意度; 低社会面子意识大学生在协作策略上的得分显著高于高争面子意识、高护面子意识和高社会面子意识大学生。
Abstract:
 Relation of consciousness of social face and conflict resolution strategies with interpersonal satisfaction was examined in a sample of college students through group sampling.Correlation analysis found that consciousness of social face related with interpersonal satisfaction negatively,and related with cooperating strategies negatively.Cooperating conflict resolution strategies was positively related with interpersonal satisfaction.Multiple hierarchical aggression analysis found that cooperating strategy contributed to interpersonal satisfaction positively,while consciousness of social face contributed to interpersonal satisfaction negatively.ANOVAs analysis found that college students who had low level of consciousness of social face got higher scores on cooperating strategies scale than college students who had high level of acquisitive face orientations or had high level of protective face orientation or had high level of consciousness of social face.Implications and limitations of this study are discussed and suggestions for future research are provided.

参考文献/References

 陈嘉康.(2004).运动团队成员角色对冲突处理风格及过程满意度之研究.体育学报,(37),215-227.
陈宛渝,邓碧云,陈韵欣.(2010).篮球选手冲突处理型态对满意度之预测(pp.95-99).全国运动心理学学术会议.
胡先缙.(2004).中国人的面子观.见 黄光国,胡先缙等著,黄光国(编),人情与面子:中国人的权利游戏(pp.40-62).北京:中国人民大学出版社.
黄光国.(2006).人情与面子:中国人的权力游戏.见 杨国枢(编),中国人的心理(pp.226-248).南京:江苏教育出版社.
金耀基.(2006).面”、“耻”与中国人行为之分析.见 杨国枢(编),中国人的心理(pp.249-269).南京:江苏教育出版社.
梁凤华,段锦云,程肇基.(2016).农民工的三类社会关系对其道德脸面感受的影响.心理科学,39(3),120-127.
宋广文,何文广.(2007).青少年亲子冲突处理策略问卷的编制及其应用.心理发展与教育,23(1),118-123.
王琦,杜永怡,席酉民.(2004).组织冲突研究回顾与展望.预测,23(3),74-80.
王轶楠,杨中芳.(2007).小我争(护)面子与大我争面子导向之关系的探讨.西南大学学报(社会科学版),33(6),20-27.
吴慧卿.(2001).选手知觉教练领导行为,团队冲突,团队凝聚力及满意度关系之实证研究(博士学位论文).台湾师范大学体育研究.
翟学伟.(2012).脸面运作与权力中心意识:官本位社会的心理机制研究.人民论坛·学术前沿,13,16-22.
翟学伟.(2011).中国人的脸面观:形式主义的心理动因与社会表征.北京:北京大学出版社.
翟学伟.(1994).面子·人情·关系网.郑州:河南人民出版社.
张勇,刘红丽.(2010).组织冲突问卷(ROCI-Ⅱ)在中国大学生中的因素结构研究.中国临床心理学杂志,18(5),584-586.
赵菊.(2006).人际关系满意感的结构与测量(硕士学位论文).华中师范大学.
赵菊,佐斌.(2008).情境事件、关系取向与人际关系满意感的关系.心理学探新,28(3),88-92.
赵卓嘉,宝贡敏.(2011).知识团队内部任务冲突的处理:感知面子威胁的中介作用研究.浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),41(1),187-200.
朱瑞玲.(2006).中国人的社会互动:论面子的问题.见 杨国枢(编),中国人的心理(pp.189-225).南京:江苏教育出版社.
Cardon,P.W.(2006).Reacting to face loss in chinese business culture:An interview report.Business Communication Quarterly,69(4),439-443.
Chou,M.L.(1996).Protective and acquisitive face orientations:A person by situation approach to face dynamics in social interaction.Doctorial dissertation,the University of Hong Kong.
Ho,D.Y.F.(1976).On the concept of face.American Journal of Sociology,81,867-884.
Hwang,K.K.(2012).Chinese models of conflict resolution.Foundations of Chinese Psychology(pp.327-367).Springer New York.
Kim,M.S.,Lee,H.,Kim,I.D.,& Hunter,J.E.(2004).A test of a cultural model of conflict styles.Journal of Asian Pacific Communication,14(2),197-222.
Kim,J.Y.,& Nam,S.H.(1998).The concept and dynamics of face:Implications for organizational behavior in Asia.Organization Science,9(4),522-534.
Laios,A.(2005).Styles of managing team conflict in professional sports:The case ofGreece.Management Research News,28(6),36-54.
Oetzel,J.(2008).An analysis of the relationships among face concerns and facework behaviors in perceived conflict situations.International Journal of Conflict Management,19(4),382-403.
Oetzel,J.G.,& Ting-Toomey,S.(2003).Face concerns in interpersonal conflict.A cross-cultural empirical test of the face negotiation theory.Communication Research,30,599-624.
Rahim,M.A.(1983).A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict.Academy of Management Journal,26(2),368-376.
Rahim,A.,& Bonoma,T.V.(1979).Managing organizational conflict:A model for diagnosis and intervention.Psychological Reports,44(3c),1323-1344.
Ting-Toomey,S.,& Kurogi,A.(1998).Facework competence in intercultural conflict:An updated face-negotiation theory.International Journal of Intercultural Relations,22,187-225.
Zhang,X.A.,Cao,Q.,& Grigoriou,N.(2011).Consciousness of Social Face:The development and Validation of a Scale Measuring Desire to Gain Face Versus Fear of Losing Face.The Journal of Social Psychology,151(2),129-149.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:江西省社会科学“十三五”(2017年)规划项目(17SH09)。 通讯作者:段锦云,E-mail:mgjyduan@hotmail.com。
更新日期/Last Update:  2018-11-30