我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 简单非一致:以再认启发式使用为例(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2019年02期
页码:
 133-139
栏目:
 认知心理学
出版日期:
 2019-04-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Simple but Not the Same:The Case of Recognition Heuristic Use
文章编号:
1003-5184(2019)02-0133-07
作者:
 王效广12胡祥恩13
 1.青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室暨华中师范大学心理学院,武汉 430079; 2.中国基础教育质量监测协同创新中心华中师范大学分中心,武汉 430079; 3.Department of Psychology,The University of Memphis,Tennessee,USA 38152
Author(s):
 Wang Xiaoguang12Hu Xiangen13
 1.Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior,Ministry of Education,and School of Psychology,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079; 2.Central China Normal University Branch,Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment toward Basic Education Quality,Wuhan 430079; 3.Department of Psychology,The University of Memphis,Tennessee,USA 38152
关键词:
 再认启发式 层级多项式加工树模型 初中生 大学生
Keywords:
 recognition heuristic hierarchical multinomial processing tree model junior school student college student
分类号:
 B842.5
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 再认启发式理论认为人们仅依赖再认做出决策。以两项高低不同再认预测力(效度)的任务为材料,选取初中生(N=138,M=14.1岁)和成年大学生(N=136,M=19.3岁)被试,探讨再认启发式使用特征。使用层级多项式加工树模型对数据进行分析,结果显示:(1)初中生较大学生认识的材料数更少或运用知识比较的正确率更低;(2)再认启发式使用存在被试异质性;(3)初中生再认启发式的使用低于大学生。结论:知识表现出随年龄增长的趋势,再认启发式的使用存在较大的个体差异和群体差异,决策时初中生相比大学生会更少依赖再认线索。
Abstract:
 Recognition heuristic(RH)theory holds that people rely solely on recognition information to make decisions.Two tasks with either high or low recognition predictive power(validity)were used as materials,junior school students(N=138,M=14.1 years)and adult college students (N=136,M=19.3 years)were selected to explore the characteristics of RH-use.A hierarchical multinomial processing tree(MPT)model was used to analyze the data.The results were as follows:(1)junior school students had fewer materials recognized or less correct knowledge cases inference than college students;(2)there was substantial heterogeneity in RH-use;(3)the use of RH for junior school students was lower than college students.Conclusion:knowledge shows the trend of growth with age,and there are large individual differences and age differences.Junior school students are less dependent on the recognition clues than college students when making decisions.

参考文献/References

 胡传鹏,孔祥祯,Eric-Jan Wagenmakers,Alexander Ly,彭凯平.(2018).贝叶斯因子及其在JASP中的实现.心理科学进展,26(6),951-965.
Batchelder,W.H.,& Riefer,D.M.(1999).Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,6(1),57-86.
Filevich,E.,Horn,S.S.,& Kühn,S.(2017).Within-person adaptivity in frugal judgments from memory.Psychological Research,(2),1-18.
Gelman,A.,& Rubin,D.B.(1992).Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences.Statistical Science,7(4),457-472.
Gigerenzer,G.,& Todd,P.M.(1999).Fast and frugal heuristics:The adaptive toolbox.In G.Gigerenzer,P.M.Todd,& the ABC Research Group(Eds.),Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart(Vol.115,pp.37-58).New York,NY:Oxford University Press.
Goldstein,D.G.,& Gigerenzer,G.(2002).Models of ecological rationality:The recognition heuristic.Psychological Review,109(1),75-90.
Goldstein,D.G.,& Gigerenzer,G.(1999).The recognition heuristic:How ignorance makes us smart.In G.Gigerenzer,P.M.Todd,& the ABC Research Group(Eds.),Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart(Vol.115,pp.37-58).New York,NY:Oxford University Press.
Heck,D.W.,Arnold,N.R.,& Arnold,D.(2017).Treebugs:An r package for hierarchical multinomial-processing-tree modeling.Behavior Research Methods,50(1),264-284.
Hilbig,B.E.(2008).Individual differences in fast-and-frugal decision making:Neuroticism and the recognition heuristic.Journal of Research in Personality,42(6),1641-1645.
Hilbig,B.E.,Erdfelder,E.,& Pohl,R.F.(2010).One-reason decision making unveiled:A measurement model of the recognition heuristic.Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory & Cognition,36(1),123-134.
Horn,S.S.,Pachur,T.,& Rui,M.(2015).How does aging affect recognition-based inference?a hierarchical bayesian modeling approach.Acta Psychologica,154,77-85.
Horn,S.S.,Ruggeri,A.,& Pachur,T.(2016).The development of adaptive decision making:Recognition-based inference in children and adolescents.Developmental Psychology,52(9),1470-1485.
Hu,X.,& Batchelder,W.H.(1994).The statistical analysis of general processing tree models with the em algorithm.Psychometrika,59(1),21-47.
Klauer,K.C.(2010).Hierarchical multinomial processing tree models:A latent-trait approach.Psychometrika,75(1),70-98.
Michalkiewicz,M.,Arden,K.,& Erdfelder,E.(2017).Do smarter people employ better decision strategies?the influence of intelligence on adaptive use of the recognition heuristic.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,31(6),Advance online publication.
Michalkiewicz,M.,& Erdfelder,E.(2016).Individual differences in use of the recognition heuristic are stable across time,choice objects,domains,and presentation formats.Memory & Cognition,44(3),454-468.
Pachur,T.,Bröder,A.,& Marewski,J.N.(2008).The recognition heuristic in memory‐based inference:Is recognition a non‐compensatory cue?Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,21(2),183-210.
Pachur,T.,Mata,R.,& Schooler,L.J.(2009).Cognitive aging and the adaptive use of recognition in decision making.Psychology and Aging,24(4),901-915.
Pohl,R.F.(2017).Measuring age-related differences in using a simple decision strategy:The case of the recognition heuristic.Zeitschrift Für Psychologie,225(1),20-30.
Riefer,D.M.,& Batchelder,W.H.(1988).Multinomial modeling and the measurement of cognitive processes.Psychological Review,95(3),318-339.
Rouder,J.N.,Speckman,P.L.,Sun,D.,Morey,R.D.,& Iverson,G.(2009).Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,16(2),225.
Smith,J.B.,& Batchelder,W.H.(2010).Beta-mpt:Multinomial processing tree models for addressing individual differences.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,54(1),167-183.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:中国基础教育质量监测协同创新中心自主课题项目资助(2016-04-011-BZK01)。 通讯作者:胡祥恩,E-mail:xiangenhu@gmail.com。
更新日期/Last Update:  2019-04-20