我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 道德脸面共享及脸面共享行为:社会关系和伦理事件的影响(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2019年02期
页码:
 151-158
栏目:
 社会心理学
出版日期:
 2019-04-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Moral Face-sharing and Moral Face-sharing Behavior:The Effect of Social Relations and Moral Events
文章编号:
1003-5184(2019)02-0151-08
作者:
 梁凤华1; 段锦云2
 1.上饶师范学院教育科学学院,上饶 334001; 2.苏州大学心理学系,苏州 215123
Author(s):
 Liang Fenghua1; Duan Jinyun2
 1.School of Education Sciences,ShangRao Normal University,ShangRao 334001; 2.Department of Psychology,Soochow University,Suzhou 215123
关键词:
 脸面共享;  脸面共享行为;  违背伦理行为;  遵从伦理行为
Keywords:
 face-sharing;  face-sharing behavior;  violating ethics behavior;  obeying ethics behavior
分类号:
 B848
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 用两个基于情境故事的纸笔实验,探讨了五类重要关系他人卷入三类负向和两类正向道德事件时,个体的脸面共享感受和脸面共享行为。研究1采用3(违背家庭伦理、违背消极义务、违背职业伦理)×5(父-子/女、兄弟、师生、朋友、同乡关系)被试间设计,研究2采用2(维护家庭伦理、维护消极义务)×5(父-子/女、兄弟、师生、朋友、同乡关系)被试间设计。结果发现:(1)当关系人违背道德时,脸面共享强度随关系的亲疏远近逐步减弱; 当关系人遵从道德时,脸面共享主要表现在家内和地缘关系上。(2)以孝道观念为核心的家庭伦理,对脸面共享感受影响最大。(3)在关系人违背道德时,个体更可能采用‘避而不谈'和‘辩护'行为,较少采用‘划界避殃'行为; 个体更可能因家庭成员违背道德而避而不谈,更愿意为关系亲密者而不是为同乡辩护; 关系人遵从伦理时,个体更可能采用宣扬行为,而不是表示关系亲密和主动谈及行为; 维护家庭伦理比见义勇为更可能被宣扬,后者则更可能被主动谈及。
Abstract:
 The research aimed to investigate whether an individual sharing face with a social related other,who conducted a particular type of negative or positive moral events,and what tactics she/he might use to maintain or gaining her/his own face when it happened.The research was divided into two parts.Basing on scenarios experiment method,studyⅠused 3(moral events:family ethics,negative obligation,professional ethics)×5(relationships:father-child,brotherhood,tutor-student,friend,fellow-townsman)between subject design,and studyⅡ used 2(moral events:family ethics,negative obligation)×5(relationships:father-child,brotherhood,tutor-student,friend,fellow-townsman)between subject design to collect data.Results showed that(1)When the dyad violated moral norms,individual would feel face-losing,but the intensity of face-losing decreased as the closeness between them weakening.And while the dyad other obeyed moral norms,individual would also feel face-gaining,but this feeling was only among family members and fellow-townsman relationships.(2)Family ethics,as the core ethics of Chinese society centering on the concept of filial piety,was more deeply valued by individuals than negative obligations and professional ethics,and had a bigger impact on face-sharing.(3)Along with face-sharing,individual also showed corresponding face-sharing behavior.When the dyad others violated moral norms,individual would more likely to avoid discussion of the events and defend for the dyad others than draw a line with him or her.Individual would most likely to avoid discussing the dyad's anti-moral behavior when the dyad other was a family member,but the defend behavior would mostly happen when they were intimacy.When dyad others obeyed moral rules,individual would more likely to use advertising behavior than showing intimacy or talking about the dyad's behavior.And the ethic obeying behavior would mostly be advertised when the dyad others obeyed family ethics than helped others for a just cause,the latter would more likely to be talked initiatively.

参考文献/References

 丛晓波,文辉.(2017).从“脸面”含义的变迁看转型期自律精神建构.社会科学战线,(9),194-201.
段锦云,魏秋江.(2012).建言效能感结构及其在员工建言行为发生中的作用.心理学报,44(7),972-985.
段媛媛.(2015).消费主义思潮对大学生价值观的影响及应对策略.现代教育科学,6,40-45.
樊浩.(2017).伦理道德,如何才是发展.道德与文明,4,5-22.
费孝通.(2004).乡土中国.北京:北京出版社.
黄光国.(2006).人情与面子:中国人的权力游戏.见 杨国枢(编),中国人的心理(pp.226-248).南京:江苏教育出版社.
黄光国.(1998).两种道德:台湾社会中道德思维研究的再诠释.本土心理学研究,9,121-175.
金耀基.(2006).“面”、“耻”与中国人行为之分析.见 杨国枢(编),中国人的心理(pp.249-269).南京:江苏教育出版社.
梁凤华,段锦云,程肇基.(2016).农民工的三类社会关系对其道德脸面感受的影响.心理科学,39(3),120-127.
梁静蓉.(2005).“关系类型”、“情感状态”与“事件性质”对关系他人“面子”的影响(硕士学位论文).台湾大学心理学研究所.
王涛,戴均.(2009).改革开放30年来大学生价值观变迁的轨迹及其规律研究.高等教育研究,(10),6-13.
危芷芬,黄光国.(1998).积极义务与消极义务:台美大学生道德判断的文化比较研究.中华心理学刊,40(2),137-153.
翟石磊,李川.(2010).身份认知与文化维度——中美文化背景下的集体主义与个体主义对比研究.哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版),12(2),37-43.
翟学伟.(2016).中国人的日常呈现.南京:南京大学出版社.
翟学伟.(2011).中国人的脸面观.北京:北京大学出版社.
朱瑞玲.(2006).中国人的社会互动:论面子的问题.见 杨国枢(编),中国人的心理(pp.189-225).南京:江苏教育出版社.
朱迪.(2015).经济资本还是文化资本更重要?——家庭背景对大学生消费文化的影响.黑龙江社会科学,148(1),111-119.
Hwang,K.K.(2006).Moral face and social face:Contingent self-esteem in Confucian society.International Journal of Psychology,41,276-281.
Zetterqvist,M.,Lundh,L.G.,& Svedin,C.G.(2013).A comparison of adolescents engaging in self-injurious behaviors with and without suicidal intent:Self-reported experiences of adverse life events and trauma symptoms.Journal of Youth & Adolescence,42(8),1257-1272.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:江西省社会科学"十三五"(2017)规划项目(17SH09)。 通讯作者:段锦云,E-mail:mgjyduan@hotmail.com。
更新日期/Last Update:  2019-04-20