我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 主题关系对无线索回忆再认效应的影响(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2019年05期
页码:
 433-438
栏目:
 认知心理学
出版日期:
 2019-09-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
 The Influence of Thematic Relation on Recognition Without Cued-recall Effect
文章编号:
1003-5184(2019)05-0433-06
作者:
 贾永萍 刘贵雄 陈 瑾 王新洋
 (新疆师范大学教育科学学院心理系,心智发展与学习科学重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830017)
Author(s):
 Jia Yongping Liu Guixiong Chen Jin Wang Xinyang
 (Department of Psychology,Xinjiang Normal University,The Key Laboratory of Mental Development and Learning Science,Xinjiang Normal University,Urumqi 830017)
关键词:
 无线索回忆再认效应;  记忆熟悉性;  主题关系
Keywords:
 the recognition without cued recall effect;  semantic feature;  thematic relation
分类号:
 B842.5
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 本研究采用RWCR范式,从无线索回忆再认的视角考察了主题关系对熟悉性的影响。结果发现,主题关系能够引发无线索回忆再认效应。具体表现为,在回忆错误项目中,被试对与学过项目有主题关系线索的熟悉性评分显著高于与学过项目无主题关系线索的熟悉性评分。这一结果表明,个体在信息提取失败时,概念形式的语义信息也能引发基于熟悉性的再认判断。
Abstract:
 Recognition without cued recall(RWCR)is the phenomenon that participants can effectively discriminate cues that resemble studied items from the ones that do not,even when they are not able to recall a studied item which is cued at test.Though previous researches identified some perceptual information could produce familiarity in the absence of recall,it is still inconclusive whether semantic features could give rise to the RWCR effect.In the present study,we used the RWCR paradigm to investigate whether the “pure” semantic feature could lead to familiarity in the absence of recall by using thematic relation which minimizes the overlap of perceptual information.The results revealed that recognition without cued recall for thematic relation still occurred.These results demonstrate that familiarity-based recognition judgments could be based on the semantic information,which could provide converging evidence for the feature-matching explanations for recognition without cued recall.

参考文献/References

 贾永萍,周楚,李林,郭秀艳.(2016).汉字的无线索回忆再认效应:重复学习和重复测验的作用.心理学报,48(2),111-120. Arndt,J.,& Lee,K.,& Flora,D.B.(2008).Recognition without identification for words,pseudowords and nonwords.Journal of Memory & Language,59(3),346-360. Clark,S.E.,& Gronlund,S.D.(1996).Global matching models of recognition memory:How the models match the data.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3(1),37-60. Cleary,A.M.(2004).Orthography,phonology,and meaning:Word features that give rise to feelings of familiarity in recognition.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11(3),446-451. Cleary,A.M.,Brown,A.S.,Sawyer,B.D.,Nomi,J.S.,Ajoku,A.C.,& Ryals,A.J.(2012).Familiarity from the configuration of objects in 3-dimensional space and its relation to déjà vu:A virtual reality investigation.Consciousness & Cognition,21(2),969-975. Cleary,A.M.,Ryals,A.J.,& Wagner,S.R.(2016).Recognition during recall failure:Semantic feature matching as a mechanism for recognition of semantic cues when recall fails.Memory & Cognition,44(1),50-62. Cleary,A.M.,Konkel,K.E.,Nomi,J.S.,& McCabe,D.P.(2010).Odor recognition without identification.Memory & Cognition,38(4),452-460. Cleary,A.M.,Winfield,M.M.,& Kostic,B.(2007).Auditory recognition without identification.Memory & Cognition,35(8),1869-1877. Collins,A.M.,& Loftus,E.F.(1975).A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.Psychological Review,82,407-428. Diana,R.A.,& Reder,L.M.(2006).Models of recognition:A review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,13(1),1-21. Estes,Z.,Golonka,S.,& Jones,L.L.(2011).Thematic thinking:The apprehension and consequences of thematic relations.In B.Ross(Ed.),Vol.54.Psychology of learning and motivation-advances in research and theory(pp.249-294).Burlington:Academic Press. Kostic,B.,& Cleary,A.M.(2009).Song recognition without identification:When people cannot “name that tune” but can recognize it as familiar.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,138(1),146-159. Kostic,B.,Cleary,A.M.,Severin,K.,& Miller,S.W.(2010).Detecting analogical resemblance without retrieving the source analogy.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,17(3),405-411. Kalenine,S.,Peyrin,C.,Pichat,C.,Segebarth,C.,Bonthoux,F.,& Baciu,M.(2009).The sensory-motor specificity of taxonomic and thematic conceptual relations:A behavioral and fMRI study.NeuroImage,44(3),1152-1162. Langley,M.M.,Cleary,A.M.,Kostic,B.N.,& Woods,J.A.(2008).Picture recognition without picture identification:A method for assessing the role of perceptual information in familiarity-based picture recognition.Acta Psychologica,127(1),103-113. Lin,E.L.,& Murphy,G.L.(2001).Thematic relations in adults' concepts.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,130(1),3-28. Ryals,A.J.,& Cleary,A.M.(2012).The recognition without cued recall phenomenon:Support for a feature-matching theory over a partial recollection account.Journal of Memory & Language,66(4),747-762. Ryals,A.J.,Cleary,A.M.,& Seger,C.A.(2013).Recall versus familiarity when recall fails for words and scenes:The differential roles of the hippocampus,perirhinal cortex,and category-specific cortical regions.Brain Research,1492,72-91. Sass,K.,Sachs,O.,Krach,S.,& Kircher,T.(2009).Taxonomic and thematic categories:Neural correlates of categorization in an auditory-to-visual priming task using fMRI.Brain Research,1270,78-87. Schwartz,M.F.,Kimberg,D.Y.,Walker,G.M.,Brecher,A.,Faseyitan,O.K.,Dell,G.S.,Mirman,D.,& Coslett,H.B.(2011).Neuroanatomical dissociation for taxonomic and thematic knowledge in the human brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,108,8520-8524. Vivas,L.,Garcia,R.G.,Bartolome,M.V.P.,Dalmeida,A.L.,& Fernandez,V.L.(2016).Recognition of thematic and taxonomic conceptual relations in patients with aphasia.Aphasiology,30(6),657-677. Whittlesea,B.W.A.,& Williams,L.D.(2000).The source of feelings of familiarity:The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,& Cognition,26(3),547-565.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目(31960173),新疆维吾尔自治区“十三五”重点学科项目(19XJKD0304),心智发展与学习科学重点实验室招标课题阶段性成果。 通讯作者:刘贵雄,E-mail:lgx_2001@126.com。
更新日期/Last Update:  2019-09-30