我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 AMO理论框架下玩兴氛围对员工绩效的促进机制(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2022年01期
页码:
 76-82
栏目:
 
出版日期:
 2022-02-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
 The Promotion Mechanism of Playful Climate on Employee Performance under the Framework of AMO Theory
文章编号:
1003-5184(2022)01-0076-07
作者:
 谢菊兰1; 李露露1; 刘小妹1; 史燕伟2
 (1.中南大学商学院,长沙 410083; 2.上海师范大学人力资源管理系,上海 200234)
Author(s):
 Xie Julan1; Li Lulu1; Liu Xiaomei1; Shi Yanwei2
 (1.School of Business,Central South University,Changsha 410083; 2.Department of Human Resource Management,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200234)
关键词:
 玩兴氛围;  AMO理论;  创新绩效;  任务绩效;  关系绩效
Keywords:
 playful climate;  AMO theory;  innovation performance;  task performance;  contextual performance
分类号:
 B848
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 玩兴氛围是指工作场所中充满愉快和幽默的氛围,是组织行为学研究领域的新兴现象。通过对相关研究进行梳理,研究从创新绩效、任务绩效和关系绩效三个方面分析了玩兴氛围对员工工作绩效的促进作用。同时,以AMO理论为框架,剖析了玩兴氛围在能力(认知能力、情绪智力)、动机(情感体验、工作投入)和机会(工作设计、社会网络)层面对员工绩效的促进机制。最后,提出未来研究可以进一步开发玩兴氛围量表,考察影响玩兴氛围后效的边界条件,探讨玩兴氛围的消极影响。
Abstract:
 Playful climate refers to the atmosphere full of joyful and humorous in the workplace,which is an emerging phenomenon in organizational behavior research.By integrating previous studies,the current study proposed that playful climate would promote employees’ performance in three aspects:innovation performance,task performance and contextual performance.Meanwhile,AMO theory is used to explore the promotion mechanism of playful climate on employees’ performance from the perspectives of abilities(cognitive ability,emotional intelligence),motivations(affective experience,work engagement)and opportunities(job design,social network).Finally,this study put forward some possible research directions for future study:developing the scale of playful climate,investigating the boundary conditions that stimulate the consequences of playful climate,and exploring the negative impact of playful climate.

参考文献/References

 聂晶,卢新怡.(2016).玩兴与创造:基于个体和组织视角分析.中国科技论坛,(3),19-23.
石冠峰,王爱华,唐杰.(2016).成人玩兴与员工创造力作用机制研究——时间管理倾向的调节效应.科技进步与对策,33(23),135-141.
杨洁,常铭超,张露.(2019).工作场所乐趣对员工创新行为的作用机制研究.管理科学,32(3),28-41.
杨洁,张露,黄勇.(2020).互联网企业玩兴氛围对创新行为的跨层次作用机制.心理科学进展,28(4),523-534.
叶余建,张炜.(2019).互联网工程师工作绩效影响因素研究——基于工作场所乐趣和代际差异的解释.高等工程教育研究,(4),119-124.
余嫔,吴静吉,林伟文,杨洁欣.(2003).成人玩兴量表与组织玩兴气氛量表之发展.测验学刊,50(1),73-110.
张阔,侯茶燕,杨柯,李萌.(2017).心理资本与工作绩效的关系:基于本土心理资本理论的视角.心理学探新,37(3),262-268.
张正堂.(2009).如何让研发人员“乐在其中”——营造促进创新的玩兴氛围.中国人力资源开发,(7),27-30.
Appelbaum,E.,Bailey,T.R.,Berg,P.B.,& Kalleberg,A.L.(2000).Manufacturing advantage:Why high-performance work systems pay off.Academy of Management Review,26(3),459-462.
Bakker,A.B.,Hetland,J.,Olsen,O.K.,Espevik,R.,& Vries,J.(2020).Job crafting and playful work design:Links with performance during busy and quiet days.Journal of Vocational Behavior,122,103478.
Celestine,N.A.,& Yeo,G.(2020).Having some fun with it:A theoretical review and typology of activity-based play-at-work.Journal of Organizational Behavior,42(2),252-268.
Chen,S.,Zhang,G.,Zhang,A.,& Xu,J.(2016).Collectivism-oriented human resource management and innovation performance:An examination of team reflexivity and team psychological safety.Journal of Management and Organization,22(4),535-548.
Chong,S.H.,Kim,Y.J.,Lee,H.W.,Johnson,R.E.,& Lin,S.H.(2020).Mind your own break! The interactive effect of workday respite activities and mindfulness on employee outcomes via affective linkages.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,159,64-77.
Csikszentmihalyi,M.(1975).Beyond boredom and anxiety.The experience of play in work and games.Contemporary Sociology,6(2),197-199.
Ekvall.(1996).Organizational climate for creativity and innovation.European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology,5(1),105-123.
Fluegge-Woolf,E.R.(2014).Play hard,work hard:Fun at work and job performance.Management Research Review,37(8),682-705.
Ford,R.C.,Mclaughlin,F.S.,& Newstrom,J.W.(2003).Questions and answers about fun at work.Human Resource Planning,26(4),18-33.
Glynn,M.A.,& Webster,J.(1992).The adult playfulness scale:An initial assessment.Psychological Reports,71(1),83-103.
Halbesleben,J.R.,Neveu,J.P.,Paustian-Underdahl,S.C.,& Westman,M.(2014).Getting to the “COR”:Understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory.Journal of Management,40(5),1334-1364.
Hobfoll,S.E.(1989).Conservation of resources.A new attempt at conceptualizing stress.American Psychologist,44(3),513-524.
Levin,D.Z.,& Cross,R.(2004).The strength of weak ties you can trust:The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer.Management Science,50(11),1477-1490.
Mainemelis,C.,& Ronson,S.(2006).Ideas are born in fields of play:Towards a theory of play and creativity in organizational settings.Research in Organizational Behavior,27,81-131.
Petelczyc,C.A.,Capezio,A.,Wang,L.,Restubog,S.,& Aquino,K.(2018).Play at work:An integrative review and agenda for future research.Journal of Management,44(1),161-190.
Pundt,A.,& Herrmann,F.(2015).Affiliative and aggressive humour in leadership and their relationship to leader-member exchange.Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,88(1),108-125.
Ryan,R.M.,& Deci,E.L.(2000).Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation,social development,and well-being.American Psychologist,55(1),68-78.
Scharp,Y.S.,Breevaart,K.,Bakker,A.B.,& Linden,D.(2019).Daily playful work design:A trait activation perspective.Journal of Research in Personality,82,103850.
Sorensen,B.M.,& Spoelstra,S.(2012).Play at work:Continuation,intervention and usurpation.Organization,19(1),81-97.
Tang,J.,Liu,M.S.,& Liu,W.B.(2017).How workplace fun influences employees’ performance:The role of person-organization value congruence.Social Behavior and Personality,45(11),1787-1802.
Tews,M.J.,Michel,J.W.,& Allen,D.G.(2014).Fun and friends:The impact of workplace fun and constituent attachment on turn over in a hospitality context.Human Relations,67(8),923-946.
VanVleet,M.,& Feeney,B.C.(2015a).Play behavior and playfulness in adulthood.Social and Personality Psychology Compass,9(11),630-643.
VanVleet,M.,& Feeney,B.C.(2015b).Young at heart:A perspective for advancing research on play in adulthood.Perspectives on Psychological Science,10(5),639-645.
Wang,Z.,& Xu,H.(2017).How and when service-oriented high-performance work systems foster employee service performance:A test of mediating and moderating processes.Employee Relations,39(4),523-540.
Webster,J.,& Martocchio,J.(1993).Turning work into play:Implications for microcomputer software training.Journal of Management,19(1),127-146.
Weiss,H.M.,& Cropanzano,R.(1996).Affective events theory:A theoretical discussion of the structure,causes and consequences of affective experiences at work.Research in Organizational Behavior,18(3),1-74.
Zhou,F.,Wang,N.,& Wu,Y.J.(2018).Does university playfulness climate matter?A testing of the mediation model of emotionallabour.Innovations in Education and Teaching International,56(2),239-250.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“工作性通信工具使用对员工健康的影响及管理对策研究”(18YJC630206),湖南省自然科学基金青年基金项目“适应理论视角下工作性通信工具使用需求对员工主观幸福感的影响”(2020JJ5782)。
通讯作者:史燕伟,E-mail:syw@shnu.edu.cn。
更新日期/Last Update:  1900-01-01