文章摘要

文章信息/Info

Title:: The Influential Mechanism of Semantic Radicals and Phonetic Radicals in Chinese Phonogram Recognition

文章编号:: 1003-5184(2022)03-0219-07

作者:: 刘璐; 姜雅梅; 张巧明; 李诸洋; (鲁东大学教育科学学院,烟台 264025)

Author(s):: Liu Lu Jiang Yamei Zhang Qiaoming Li Zhuyang; (School of Educational Sciences,Ludong University,Yantai 264025)

关键词:: 形声字; 声符; 义符; 功能属性; 汉字认知

Keywords:: phonogram; semantic radical; phonetic radical; functional attributes; Chinese characters cognition

分类号:: B842.5

DOI:: -

文献标识码:: A

摘要:: 形声字是汉字的主体,声符和义符作为形声字的构字部件,其各自的功能属性对形声字的识别具有不同的影响。当前研究采用多种实验任务,结合眼动以及脑电等多种技术,对声符和义符各自的功能属性及作用机制进行了较为全面的研究,这为后续研究奠定了良好的基础,并对未来汉字认知领域的研究具有重要的启示作用。

Abstract:: Phonogram is the principal part of Chinses character,which are composed of a semantic radical and a phonetic radical.There is the different role on the recognition of phonogram because of the functional attributes of components.In the current studies,the researchers used a variety of experimental tasks,combined with eye movement,EEG and other technologies to comprehensively study the functional attributes and mechanism of semantic radicals and phonetic radicals.It is a good foundation for the follow-up research,and an important enlightenment for the future research in the field of Chinese character cognition.

参考文献/References

毕鸿燕,胡伟,翁旭初.(2006).汉语形声字声旁家族大小对整字发音的影响.心理学报,36(6),791-797.
蔡厚德,齐星亮,陈庆荣,钟元.(2012).声旁位置对形声字命名规则性效应的影响.心理学报,44(7),868-881.
陈金明.(2012).识字教学与儿童认知发展.语文教学研究,7(1),4-9.
陈新葵,张积家.(2008).义符熟悉性对高频形声字词汇通达的影响.心理学报,40(2),148-159.
陈新葵,张积家.(2012).义符熟悉性对低频形声字词汇通达的影响.心理学报,44(7),882-895.
迟慧,闫国利,徐晓露,夏萤,崔磊,白学军.(2014).声旁语音信息对形声字加工的影响——来自眼动研究的证据.心理学报,46(9),1242-1260.
崔新,苏萌萌,舒华.(2018).语言认知神经科学研究中的脑沟形态分析.心理科学进展,26(6),994-1003.
韩布新.(1996).汉字识别中部件组合的频率效应.心理学报,28(3),232-237.
姜敏敏,张积家,李虎.(2011).声旁家族大小和高频同声旁字对汉字命名的影响.心理学探新,31(5),434-439.
李蕊.(2005).留学生形声字形旁意识发展的实验研究.语言教学与研究,27(4),52-58.
钱怡,张逸玮,毕鸿燕.(2015).汉字识别中的形旁家族效应.人类工效学,21(3),25-30.
舒华,张厚粲.(1987).成年熟练读者的汉字读音加工过程.心理学报,19(3),282-290.
王丹,王婷,秦松,张积家.(2019).部件启动范式下可成字部件的位置效应.心理学报,51(2),163-176.
王娟,马雪梅,李兵兵,张积家.(2019).汉字形声字识别中义符和声符的家族效应.心理学报,51(8),857-868.
王娟,张积家.(2016).义符的类别一致性和家族大小影响形声字的语义加工.心理学报,48(11),1390-1400.
王协顺,吴岩,赵思敏,倪超,张明.(2016).形旁和声旁在形声字识别中的作用.心理学报,48(2),130-140.
吴岩,李天虹,高约飞.(2019).二、三和五年级儿童对形旁语义的加工.心理科学,42(2),322-328.
徐彩华,Maries,A.(2019).声符累计频率对留学生汉字字音成绩的影响.语言教学与研究,41(3),90-102.
闫国利,迟慧,卞迁,徐子珺,崔磊.(2013).声旁与笔画省略方式对形声字识别的影响.心理科学,36(1),14-19.
杨珲,彭聃龄,Perfetti,C.A.,谭力海.(2000).汉字阅读中语音的通达与表征(Ⅰ):字水平与亚字水平的语音及其交互作用.心理学报,32(2),144-151.
杨润陆.(2017).现代汉字学(第二版).北京:北京师范大学出版社.
张积家,姜敏敏.(2008).形旁家族、声旁家族和高频同声旁字对形声字识别的影响.心理学报,40(9),947-960.
张积家,彭聃龄,张厚粲.(1991).分类过程中汉字的语义提取(Ⅱ).心理学报,23,139-144.
张积家,王娟,陈新葵.(2014).义符研究20年:理论探讨、实验证据和加工模型.心理科学进展,22(3),381-399.
张积家,王娟,印丛.(2014).声符和义符在形声字语音、语义提取中的作用——来自部件知觉眼动研究的证据.心理学报,46(7),885-900.
张积家,张厚粲,彭聃龄.(1990).分类过程中汉字的语义提取(Ⅰ).心理学报,22,397-405.
张积家,章玉祉.(2016).义符启动范式下义符的语义和语法激活的时间进程.心理学报,48(9),1070-1081.
张亚旭,周晓林,舒华,邢红兵.(2003).汉字识别中声旁与整字语音激活的相对优势.北京大学学报(自然科学版),39(1),126-133.
张喆,韩布新,陈天勇.(2003).两种呈现速度下整字及声旁命名.心理学报,35(2),178-182.
章玉祉,张积家.(2018).形声字的语义透明度和结构类型对义符语音激活进程的影响.心理与行为研究,16(5),612-617.
周晓林,鲁学明,舒华.(2000).亚词汇水平加工的本质:形旁的语音激活.心理学报,32(1),20-24.
朱朝霞,刘丽,崔磊,彭聃龄.(2019).书写对阅读的影响——来自传统书写与电脑打字的证据.心理科学进展,27(5),796-803.
朱朝霞,彭聃龄,刘丽,丁国盛.(2009).拼音输入法经验对汉字字形和语音加工的影响.心理学报,41(9),785-792.
Cao,F.,Vu,M.,Chan,D.H.L.,Lawrence,J.M.,Harris,L.N.,Guan,Q.,…Perfetti,C.A.(2013).Writing affects the brain network of reading in Chinese:A functional magnetic resonance imaging study.Human Brain Mapping,34(7),1670-1684.
Carreiras,M.,Armstrong,B.C.,Perea,M.,& Frost,R.(2014).The what,when,where,and how of visual word recognition.Trends in Cognitive Science,18(2),90-98.
Chou,T.L.,Chen,C.W.,Wu,M.Y.,& Booth,J.R.(2009).The role of inferior frontal gyrus inferior parietal lobule in semantic processing of Chinese characters.Experimental Brain Research,198(4),465-475.
Guan,C.Q.,Liu,Y.,Chan,D.H.L.,Ye,F.,& Perfetti,C.A.(2011).Writing strengthens orthography and alphabetic-coding strengthens phonology in learning to read Chinese.Journal of Educational Psychology,103(3),509-522.
Hung,Y.H.,Hung,D.L.,Tzeng,O.J.L.,& Wu,D.H.(2014).Tracking the temporal dynamics of the processing of phonetic and semantic radicals in Chinese character recognition by MEG.Journal of Neurolinguistics,29(5),42-65.
Li,M.F.,Gao,X.Y.,& Wu,J.T.(2020).Neighborhood effects in Chinese character recognition:Going beyond phonological perspectives to explain a possible underlying mechanism.Reading and Writing,33(3),547-570.
Luo,J.,Wu,Y.,& Jiao,R.(2018).Parafoveal processing in Chinese sentence reading:Early extraction of radical level phonology.Frontiers in Psychology,doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01605.
Seidenberg,M.S.(1985).The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems.Cognition,19(1),1-30.
Su,I.F.,& Weekes,B.S.(2007).Effects of frequency and semantic radical combinability on reading in Chinese:An ERP study.Brain and Language,103,111-112.
Wang,X.,Pei,M.,Wu,Y.,& Su,Y.(2017).Semantic radicals more than phonetic radicals to the recognition of Chinese phonograms:Behavioral and ERP evidence in a factorial study.Frontiers in Psychology,8(12),1-9.
Wang,X.,Zhao,R.,Zevin,J.D.,& Yang,J.(2016).The neural correlates of the interaction between semantic and phonological processing for Chinese character reading.Frontiers in Psycholgy,7,1-14.
Williams,C.(2013).Emerging development of semantic and phonological routes to character decoding in Chinese as a foreign language learners.Reading and Writing,26,293-315.
Williams,C.,& Bever,T.(2010).Chinese character decoding:A semantic bias? Reading and Writing,23,589-605.
Wu,C.Y.,Ho,M.H.R.,& Chen,S.H.A.(2012).A meta-analysis of fMRI studies on Chinese orthographic,phonological,and semantic processing.NeuroImage,63(1),381-391.
Yan,M.,Zhou,W.,Shu,H.,& Kliegl,R.(2012).Lexical and sub-lexical semantic preview benefits in Chinese reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,38(4),1069-1075.

我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

声符与义符在形声字识别中的影响机制(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

文章信息/Info

参考文献/References

备注/Memo

常用功能

导航/Navigate

工具/Tools

统计/Statistics