我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 发展地看待知识内隐性的判别方法：内隐与外显学习区分的新途径

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2011年31卷04期
页码:
 326-331
栏目:
 认知心理学
出版日期:
 2012-07-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Considering the Discriminating Method of Implicit Knowledge Developmentally： A New Approach of Distinguishing Explicit and Implicit Learning
作者:
 胡伟;吕勇
 天津师范大学 心理与行为研究院，天津 300074
Author(s):
 Hu Wei;Lv Yong
 Academy of Psychology and Behavior，Tianjin Normal University，Tianjin 300074
关键词:
 知识内隐性; 主观标准; 客观标准; 猜测率
Keywords:
 implicit knowledge; subject criterion; object criterion; guessing level
分类号:
 B842.5
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 知识内隐性的判别一直是内隐学习研究领域的研究重点之一，恰当的区分内隐被试和外显被试对于该类研究有着至关重要的意义。本文介绍知识内隐性判别问题的研究历史，由最初的主观标准和客观标准到后来改进的研究方法，指出了随着对待内隐和外显学习两者关系的理论的发展，研究方法有必要与时俱进，并提出了新的区分内隐被试和外显被试的新方法。相对于传统研究方法，新方法从内隐知识和外显知识互为补充、“任何一种学习即存在内隐学习，也存在外显学习”的理论指导下，通过被试的猜测水平来判断其内隐水平，并确定“纯的”内隐被试的标准。该方法发展地看待内隐学习及其与外显学习的关系，有助于研究者更加深入、精确地研究内隐学习的相关问题。
Abstract:
 The discriminance of implicit knowledge was always one of the key point in the field of implicit learning；it was so meaningful as to distinguish explicit and implicit subjects.The research introduced the research history of the discriminance of implicit knowledge，from the subject criterion to the object criterion，pointed out that as the theory development of the relationship of explicit and implicit learning，the research method had to be developed too and put up the new method.Comparing with the traditional research method，the new one，with the guidance of theory of explicit and implicit knowledge was complementary to each other and ‘every kind of learning was including explicit and implicit learning’，measured the subjects’ implicit level with their guessing level and confirmed the ‘pure’ implicit criterion.The method considered the relationship of explicit and implicit learning developmentally，conducive to study the relative issue of implicit learning further and precisely.

参考文献/References

 1Shanks D R，St John M F.Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems.Behavioral and Brain Sciences，1994，17：367-447.
2Shanks D R，St John M F.Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems.Behavioral and Brain Sciences，1994，17：367-395.
3Goschke T.The role of attention in implicit learning of event sequences，abstract.International Journal of Psychology，1992，27：110.
4Reingold E M，Merikle P M.Using direct and indirect measures to study perception without awareness.Perception & Psychophysics，1988，44：563-575.
5Abrams M，Reber A S.Implicit learning：Robustness in the face of psychiatric disorders.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research，1988，17：425-439.
6Allen R，Reber A S.Very long term memory for tacit knowledge.Cognition，1980，8：175-185.
7Reber A S，Allen R.Analogy and abstraction strategies in synthetic grammar learning：A functionalist interpretation.Cognition，1978，6：189-221.
8Reber A S，Lewis S.Toward a theory of implicit learning：The analysis of the form and structure of a body of tacit knowledge.Cognition，1977，5：333-361.
9Reber A S.Implicit learning of artificial grammars.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior，1967，6(2)：317-327.
10Shanks D R，St John M F.Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems.Behavioral and Brain Sciences，1994，17：367-395.
11Olson I R，Chun M M.Temporal contextual cuing of visual attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology：Learning，Memory，and Cognition，2001，27(5)：1299-1313.
12Willingham D B，Nissen M J，Bullemer P.On the development of procedural knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology：Learning，Memory，and Cognition，1989，15：1047-1060.
13Schmidt P A，Dark V J.Attentional processing of “unattended” flankers：Evidence for a failure of selective attention.Perception & Psychophysics，1998，60：227-238.
14Rüsseler J，Rosler F.Implicit and explicit learning of event sequences：Evidence for distinct coding of perceptual and motor representations.Acta Psychologica，2000，104：45-67.
15Dienes Z，Berry D C.Implicit learning：Below the subjective threshold.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review，1997，4(1)：3-23.
16Dienes Z，Scott R.Measuring unconscious knowledge：Distinguishing structural knowledge and judgment knowledge.Psychological Research，2005，69：338-351.
17Jacoby L A，Toth J P，Yonelinas A P.Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory：Measuring recollection.Journal of Experimental Psychology：General，1993，122：139-154.
18Jacoby L A.Process dissociation framework：Separating automatic from intentional use of memory.Journal of Memory and Language，1991，30：513-541.
19Destrebecqz A，Cleeremans A.Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review，2001，8(2)：343-350.
20郭秀艳．内隐学习和外显学习的关系评述．心理科学进展，2004，12(2)：185-192.
21郭秀艳．内隐学习．上海：华东师范大学出版社，2003：118-141. 22Curran T.Implicit learning revealed by the method of opposition.Trends in Cognitive Sciences，2001，5(12)：503-504.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目：教育部人文社会科学研究基地重大项目（05JJDXLX003)，全国高校优秀博士论文作者专项资金项目（200708)，天津师范大学哲学社会科学研究青年基金（52WM73)。通讯作者：吕勇，E-mail：ly6312@163.com。
更新日期/Last Update:  2011-10-28