我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 角色扮演测评技术用于管理人员选拔的模拟研究

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2011年31卷04期
页码:
 348-353
栏目:
 人格与社会心理学
出版日期:
 2012-07-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
 The Simulation Study of Role-playing in Administrator Selection
作者:
 冯江平1张世娟2
 1.云南师范大学 教育科学与管理学院,昆明 650092;2.临沧师范高等专科学校 政教系,临沧 677000
Author(s):
 Feng Jiangping1Zhang Shijuan2
 1.Education Science and Management College,Yunnan Normal University,Kunming 650092; 2.Political Education Department of Lincang Teacher’s College,Lincang 677000
关键词:
 角色扮演评分者管理者信度效度
Keywords:
 role-playingscoreradministratorreliabilityvalidity
分类号:
 B848
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 运用角色扮演测评技术,对企业管理人员的选拔进行了模拟研究。结果表明,角色扮演测评技术具有较高的信度和效度,管理者与普通员工的测评结果差异显著,角色扮演测评技术作为一种管理人员选拔工具,具有较强的适用性。此外,不同类型的评分者在对同一批被试进行评价时,评分存在一定的差异,因而须对评分者进行相应的培训;应聘者的性别差异不明显,但20岁以下组与21岁以上各组的年龄差异明显。
Abstract:
 The simulation study on selecting enterprise administrators adopted role-playing technique.The results indicated that role playing technique demonstrates the good reliability and validity,and different dimensions can be distinguished properly.There are big differences between manager and general stuff.Role playing as an administrator selection tool has the extensive applicability.In addition,different scorer groups make different scores on the same subjects,so the scores must be trained before scoring.The gender difference of candidates was not significant,and the age difference of candidates between group under 20 and group over 21 was significant.

参考文献/References

 1Kendall P C.Behavioral assessment and methodlogy.In The American Review of Behavioral Therapy:Therapy and Practice,1984,10:47-86.
2Dr.Krysia M,Yardley-Matwiejczuk.Role play:Theory and practice.London:Sage Publications,1997.
3Bellcak A S,Morrison R L,Muser K T,et al..Role-play for assessing the social competence of psychiatric patients.Psychology Assessment,1990,2(3):248-255.
4谷向东,李伟.社会技能的角色扮演测试.心理学动态,1998,3:47-51.
5陈社育,余嘉元.仿真模拟测评技术信度和效度的初步研究.心理科学,2000,23(6):669-671.
6Abraham S,Rachela M.Assessor type,number of distinguishable dimension categories,and assessment center construct validity.Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology,1997,70(2):103-108.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 -
更新日期/Last Update:  2011-10-28