我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 工作越轨行为的结构与组织公民行为的关系：一项实证检验

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2011年31卷04期
页码:
 343-347
栏目:
 人格与社会心理学
出版日期:
 2012-07-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
 An Empirical Study of Dimensionality of Work Deviant Behavior and Its Relationship with Organizational Citizenship Behavior
作者:
 孙健敏1; 2; 王震2
 1.中国人民大学 心理学系，北京 100872；2.中国人民大学 劳动人事学院，北京 100872
Author(s):
 Sun Jianmin1; 2; Wang Zhen2
 1.Department of Psychology，Renmin University of China，Beijing 100872； 2.School of Labor and Human Resources，Renmin University of China，Beijing 100872
关键词:
 组织公民行为; 工作越轨行为; 组织越轨; 人际越轨
Keywords:
 organizational citizenship behavior; work deviant behavior; organizational deviance; interpersonal deviance
分类号:
 B848
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 新近出现的绩效结构理论认为员工绩效包括角色内行为、组织公民行为和工作越轨行为三种类型。然而在后两种行为的关系上，当前研究者还未达成一致意见。文章综合采用三种方式证实了组织公民行为和工作越轨行为是两种完全不同的行为类型，而不是一种行为的两种性质不同的表现，从而为三维绩效模型的合理性提供了间接支持。在此基础上，研究还证实了工作越轨行为中两种成分(组织越轨和人际越轨)的不同。文章最后对研究结果进行了讨论，并指出了未来研究方向。
Abstract:
 The new performance theory proposed that performance included three different components such as in-role，citizenship and deviant behavior.However，controversy on the relationship between citizenship and deviant behavior still remained in current literature.By using three different approaches，this paper supported the three-dimensional performance theory by demonstrating that citizenship and deviance were two related but separate behaviors，rather than two sides along a continuum.Based their distinction，the paper also disentangled the association of interpersonal deviance and organizational deviance.Discussion，contribution and recommendation to future research concluded the paper.

参考文献/References

 1Dalal R S.A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior.Journal of Applied Psychology，2005，90(6)：1241-1255.
2Lievens F，Conway J M，De Corte W.The relative importance of task，citizenship and counterproductive performance to job performance ratings：Do rater source and team-based culture matter? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology，2008，81(1)：11-27.
3Rotundo M，Sackett P R.The relative importance of task，citizenship，and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance：A policy-capturing approach.Journal of Applied Psychology，2002，87(1)：66-80.
4Ferris D L，Brown D J，Lian H W，et al..When does self-esteem relate to deviant behavior? The role of contingencies of self-worth.Journal of Applied Psychology，2009，94(5)：1345-1353.
5Judge T A，Scott B A，Ilies R.Hostility，job attitudes，and workplace deviance：Test of a multilevel model.Journal of Applied Psychology，2006，91(1)：126-138.
6Lee K，Allen N J.Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance：The role of affect and cognitions.Journal of Applied Psychology，2002，87(1)：131-142.
7Robinson S L，Bennett R J.A typology of deviant workplace behaviors：A multidimensional scaling study.Academy of Management Journal，1995，38(2)：555-572.
8Bennett R J，Stamper C L.Corporate citizenship and deviancy：A study of work behavior.In：C Galbraith，M Ryan.Eds.International research in the business disciplines：Strategies and organizations in transition.Amsterdam：Elsevier Science，2001：265-284.
9Collins J M，Griffin R W.The psychology of counterproductive job performance.In：Griffin R W，A O’Leary-Kelly，Collins J M.Eds.Dysfunctional behavior in organizations：Non-violent dysfunctional behavior.Stamford：JAI Press，1998：219-242.
10Kelloway E K，Loughlin C，Barling J，et al..Self-reported counterproductive behaviors and organizational citizenship behaviors：Separate but related constructs.International Journal of Selection and Assessment，2002，10(1-2)：143-151.
11Sackett P R.The structure of counterproductive work behaviors：Dimensionality and relationships with facets of job performance.International Journal of Selection and Assessment，2002，10(1-2)：5-11.
12张永军，廖建桥，赵君.国外组织公民行为与反生产行为关系研究述评.外国经济与管理，2010，5：31-39. 13Berry C M，Ones D S，Sackett P R.Interpersonal deviance，organizational deviance，and their common correlates：A review and meta-analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology，2007，92(2)：410-424.
14Sackett P R，Berry C M，Wiemann S A，et al..Citizenship and counterproductive work behavior：Clarifying relationships between the two domains.Human Performance，2006，19(4)：441-464.
15Spector P E，Bauer J A，Fox S.Measurement artifacts in the assessment of counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior：Do we know what we think we know? Journal of Applied Psychology，2010，95(4)：781-790.
16Marcus B，Schuler H.Antecedents of counterproductive behavior at work：A general perspective.Journal of Applied Psychology，2004，89(4)：647-660.
17Farh J L，Earley P C，Lin S C.Impetus for action：A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society.Administrative Science Quarterly，1997，42(3)：421-444.
18Rotundo M，Xie J L.Understanding the domain of counterproductive work behavior in China.International Journal of Human Resource Management，2008，19(5)：856-877.
19Bennett R J，Robinson S L.Development of a measure of workplace deviance.Journal of Applied Psychology，2000，85(3)：349-360.
20Cable D M，DeRue D S.The convergent and discriminate validity of subjective fit perceptions.Journal of Applied Psychology，2002，87(5)：875-884.
21Bandalos D L，Finney S J.Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling.In：Marcoulides G A，Schumacker R E.Eds.Advanced structural equation modeling：New developments and techniques.Mahwah，NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates，2001. 22O’ Brien K E，Allen T D.The relative importance of correlates of organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior：Using multiple sources of data.Human Performance，2008，21(1)：62-88.
23Bentler P M，Yuan K H.Structural equation modeling with small samples：Test statistics.Multivariate Behavioral Research，1999，34(2)：181-197.
24Lau V C S，Au W T，Ho J M C.A qualitative and quantitative review of antecedents of counterproductive behavior in organizations.Journal of Business and Psychology，2003，18(1)：73-99.
25Bobko P.Correlation and regression：Principles and applications for industrial/organizational psychology and management.New York，NY：McGraw-Hill，1995.
26郭晓薇，严文华.国外反生产行为研究述评.心理科学，2008,31(4)：936-939.
27杨杰，凌文辁，方俐洛.工作场所中越轨行为的定义、特性与分类体系解析.心理科学进展，2004，12(3)：472-479.
28张建卫，刘玉新.企业反生产行为：概念与结构解析.心理科学进展，2009，17(5)：1059-1066.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 -
更新日期/Last Update:  2011-10-28