我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 假言推理判定标准的发展性研究(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2018年03期
页码:
 209-214
栏目:
 认知心理学
出版日期:
 2018-05-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Study on Development of Criteria of Hypothetical Reasoning
作者:
 滕洪昌1; 胡竹菁2
 1.鲁东大学教育科学学院,烟台 264025; 2.江西师范大学心理学院,南昌 330022
Author(s):
 Teng Hongchang1; Hu Zhujing2
 1.School of Education Science,Ludong University,YanTai 264025; 2.School of Psychology,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang 330022
关键词:
 假言推理;  判定标准;  逻辑规则
Keywords:
 hypothetical reasoning;  judgment criteria;  logical rules
分类号:
 B842.5
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 以充分条件和必要条件假言推理题目为测验材料,对小学四年级、初中二年级、高中二年级和大学二年级共469名被试进行了测量。结果表明:(1)内容和形式两种判断标准从小学四年级就开始发展了,但是小学生和中学生还是根据经验事实来进行判断,直到大学才摆脱经验事实的束缚。(2)必要条件推理的能力发展要早于充分条件推理的能力,而且最后能够达到的水平也要高。(3)被试对规则掌握的先后顺序是肯定前件式、否认前件式、肯定后件式和否认后件式。(4)被试是否受到信念偏见效应的影响,还要看题目是否符合事实以及是否符合逻辑规则。
Abstract:
 The research's materials were composed of two kinds of hypothetical reasoning items,the sufficient condition and the necessary condition.And four kinds of students totally 469 were tested,the fourth grade of primary school,the second grade of junior middle school,the second grade of senior middle school,and the sophomore.The results indicated that:(1)Two judgment criteria(content and form)began to develop from fourth grade of primary school,but the student of primary school and middle school judged the problems according to experience facts.They got rid of the constraint of experience facts until they entered universities.(2)The ability of necessary conditional developed earlier than that of sufficient conditional reasoning,and achieved higher level.(3)There was obvious format effect among the four ages,and the order that students grasped the logic rules was affirmation of the antecedent; denial of the antecedent; affirmation of the consequent; denial of the consequent.(4)Whether there were the effects of faith prejudice depended on the items' conformity to logic rules and facts.

参考文献/References

 丁月华,李红.(2003).三种处理下三段论推理加工过程的发展研究.心理科学,26(5),947-950.
方富熹,唐洪.(2000).12岁儿童充分条件假言推理能力发展的个体差异研究.心理学报,32(3),269-275.
胡竹菁.(1999).“心理模型”与“知识和试题双重结构模型”的实验比较研究,心理科学,22(4),362-364.
胡竹菁.(2002).推理心理研究中的逻辑加工与非逻辑加工评析.心理科学,25(3),318-321.
胡竹菁,朱丽萍.(2003).推理解决正确性判定标准再探.心理与行为研究,1(4),248-251.
胡竹菁,胡笑羽.(2015).人类推理“推理题与推理知识双重结构模型”.心理学探新,35(3),212-216.
Byrne,R.M.J.(1990).Reasoning in Lines of thinking.New York:John Wiley.
Falmagne,R.J.,& Gonsawes,J.(1995).Deductive inference.Psychology Review,46,525-559.
Johnson-Laird.(1993).Proposition reasoning by model.Psychology Review,(3),418-439.
Markovits,H.(1989).Reasoning with contrary-to-fact propositions,Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,47,398-412.
Markovits,H.(1992).The belief-biase effect in reasoning,The development and activation of competence.British Journal of Development Psychology,10,269-284.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 -
更新日期/Last Update:  2018-05-30