我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 精神分析客体关系革命的折衷进路:英国独立学派评述(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2019年03期
页码:
 206-214
栏目:
 理论心理学
出版日期:
 2019-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
 The Eclectic Approach of the Object Relations Revolution of Psychoanalysis:A Review of the British School of Independents
文章编号:
1003-5184(2019)03-0206-09
作者:
 王礼军1; 郭本禹2
 (1.安徽师范大学教育科学学院,芜湖 241000; 2.南京师范大学心理学院,南京 210097)
Author(s):
 Wang Lijun1; Guo Benyu2
 (1.School of Educational Science,Anhui Normal University,Wuhu 241000; 2.School of Psychology,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210097)
关键词:
 独立学派;  客体关系;  “弗洛伊德-克莱因论战”;  精神分析
Keywords:
 School of Independents;  object relations;  “the Freud-Klein Controversies”;  psychoanalysis
分类号:
 B8409
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 自精神分析学诞生以来,其发展进路经历了自我革命、客体关系革命、自体革命、关系革命和神经科学革命。英国独立学派是客体关系革命的主要发起者和中间力量,它诞生于20世纪40年代英国精神分析学会内部的“论战”,并在规模以及精神分析理论和技术方面都取得重大发展。独立学派的精神分析师以开放和折衷的态度批判性地汲取各种现存的精神分析观点,形成不同于克莱因学派的客体关系思想,并表现出独立性、开放性、关系性和真实性的内涵与特征。温尼科特、费尔贝恩和巴林特是独立学派的主要代表人物,他们各自建构出独特的客体关系理论,促使精神分析范式从一元驱力模式转向二元客体关系模式,推动了客体关系理论的深入发展,奠定了后续精神分析发展的基石。
Abstract:
 Since the birth of psychoanalysis,it has experienced ego revolution,object relations revolution,self revolution,relational revolution and neuroscience revolution.The British Independent School is the main initiator and eclectic power in the object relations revolution of psychoanalysis.It was born out of the Freud-Klein Controversies within the British Psychoanalytic Society in the 1940s,and has made significant progress both in scale and psychoanalytic theories and techniques.The independent psychoanalysts critically absorbed various kinds of existing psychoanalytic point of views with an open and eclectic attitude,and formed psychoanalytic thoughts of object relations different from Kleinians.The Independents and their theories show the connotations and characteristics of independence,openness,relationship and authenticity.Donald Winnicott,Ronald Fairbairn and Michael Balint are the key figures of the School of Independents,they all constructed their own unique object relations theories,which prompting the psychoanalytic research paradigm from unitary drive mode into dual object relations mode,promoting the further development of the object relations theory,and laying the foundation for the subsequent development of psychoanalysis.

参考文献/References

 胡远超.(2008).“人之初”的精神图谱——精神分析客体关系理论研究(博士学位论文).吉林大学. 金,斯坦纳.(2013).佛洛伊德-克莱恩论战1941-1945(林玉华,蔡荣裕 译).台北市:联经. 王礼军,吕英军,郭本禹.(2017).“淑女之争”与“君子协议”:回眸英国精神分析学会的“论战”.心理科学,40(1),244-250. 郗浩丽.(2008).客体关系理论的转向:温尼科特研究.福州:福建教育出版社. 徐萍萍,王艳萍,郭本禹.(2010).独立学派的客体关系理论:费尔贝恩、巴林特研究.福州:福建教育出版社. 雅各布斯.(2003).温尼考特——客体关系理论代言人(于而彦,廖世德 译).台北:生命潜能文化事业有限公司. Balint,M.(1965).Primary love and psychoanalytic technique.New York:Liveright Publishing Corporation. Balint,M.(1972).The doctor,his patient and the illness.New York:International Universities Press. Casement,P.(1990).Further learning from the patient.London:Routledge. Cassullo,G.(2014).Charles Rycroft and the making of an independent psychoanalyst.Contemporary Psychoanalysis,50(3),332-370. Clarke,G.S.(2006).Personal relations theory,Fairbairn,MacMurray and Suttie.Hove:Routledge. Clarke,G.S.(2011).On:The narcissism of minor difference.The International Journal of Psychoanalysis,92(1),231-233. Fairbairn,R.(1952).Psychoanalytic studies of the personality.London and New York:Routledge. Giovacchini,P.L.(1990).Tactics and techniques in psychoanalytic therapy III:The implications of Winnicott's contribution.London:Jason Aronson. Greenberg,J.R.,& Mitchell,S.A.(1983).Object relations in psychoanalytic theory.Cambridge and London:Harvard University Press. Grotstein,J.S.(1994).Notes on Fairbairn's metapsychology.In D.B.Rinsley & J.S.Grotstein(Eds.),Fairbairn and the origins of object relations(pp.112-148).London:Free Association. Hamilton,V.(2013).The analyst's preconscious.New York and London:Routledge. Horne,A.(2006).The independent position in psychoanalytic psychotherapy with children and adolescents:Roots and implications.In M.Lanyado & A.Horne(Eds.),A question of technique:Independent psychoanalytic approaches with children and adolescents(pp.18-33).London and New York:Routledge. Hughes,J.M.(1989).Reshaping the psychoanalytic domain:The work of Melanie Klein,W.R.D.Fairbairn,and D.W.Winnicott.Berkeley and Los Angeles:University of California Press. Kernberg,O.F.(2011).Divergent contemporary trends in psychoanalytic theory.Psychoanalytic Review,98(5),633-664. Kohon,G.(1986).The British school of psychoanalysis:The independent tradition.New Haven and London:Yale University Press. Lanyado,M.,& Horne,A.(2006).A question of technique:Independent psychoanalytic approaches with children and adolescents.London and New York:Routledge. Laabs-Siemon,V.(2010).Independent traditions and middle groups in contemporary psychoanalysis.International Journal of Psychoanalysis,91(5),1246-1249. Lomas,P.(2004).The question of independence in psychotherapy.In J.Pearson(Eds.),Analyst of the imagination:The life and work of Charles Rycroft(pp.88-93).London:Karnac. Malcolm,J.(1981).Psychoanalysis:The impossible profession.New York:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Mcleod,J.(2003).An introduction to counselling.Berkshire:Open University Press. Mishne,J.M.(1993).The evolution and application of clinical theory-Perspective from four psychologies.New York:The Free Press. Nicolò,A.M.(2015).Playing.In G.Saragnano & C.Seulin(Eds.),Playing and reality revisited:A new look at winnicott's classic work(pp.21-44).London:Karnac. Ogden,T.H.(2010).Why Read Fairbairn?International Journal of Psychoanalysis,91(1),101-118. Oppenheim-Gluckman,H.(2015).Reading Michael Balint:A pragmatic clinician.London & New York:Routledge. Padel,J.(2014).The contribution of W.R.D.Fairbairn(1889-1965)to psychoanalytic theory and practice.In G.S.Clark & D.E.Scharff(Eds.),Fairbairn and the Object Relations Tradition:Lines of Development—Evolution of Theory and Practice Over the Decades(pp.343-358).London:Karnac. Padel,J.(1991).The psychoanalytic theories of Melanie Klein and Donald Winnicott and their interaction in the British society of psychoanalysis.Psychoanalytic Review,78(3),325-345. Parsons,M.(2009).An independent theory of clinical technique.Psychoanalytic Dialogues,19(3),221-236. Rayner,E.(1991).The independent mind in British psychoanalysis.Northvale and London:Jason Aronson Inc. Ricaud,M.M.(2002).Michael Balint:An introduction.The American Journal of Psychoanalysis,62(1),17-24. Ricaud,M.M.(2007).Balint's influence on contemporary psychoanalytic theory and practice.The American Journal of Psychoanalysis,67(4),317-333. Roazen,P.(2002).A meeting with Donald Winnicott in 1965.In B.Kahr(Eds.),The legacy of winnicott:Essays on infant and child mental health(pp.23-35).London:Karnac. Rycroft,C.(1995).A critical dictionary of psychoanalysis.London:Penguin Books. Schafer,R.(1999).Recentering psychoanalysis from Heinz Hartmann to the contemporary British Kleinians.Psychoanalytic Psychology,16(3),339-664. Scharff,D.E.,& Birles,E.F.(2014).From instinct to self:The evolution and implications of W.R.D.Fairbairn's theory of object relations.In G.S.Clark & D.E.Scharff(Eds.),Fairbairn and the object relations tradition:Lines of development—evolution of theory and practice over the decades(pp.39-62).London:Karnac. Spelman,M.B.(2013).The evolution of Winnicott's thinking:Examing the growth of psychoanalytic thought over three generations.London:Karnac. Spelman,M.B.,& Thomson-Salo,F.(2015).The Winnicott tradition:Lines of development-evolution of theory and practice over the decades.London:Karnac. Summers,F.(2014).Object relations theories and psychopathology:A comprehensive text.New York and London:Psychology Press. Sutherland,J.D.(1980).The British object relations theorists:Balint,Winnicott,Fairbairn,Guntrip.Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association,28(4),829-860. Sutherland,J.D.(1989).Fairbairn's journey into the interior.London:Free Association Books. Suttie,I.D.(1988).The origins of love and hate.London:Free Association Books. White,J.(2006).Generation:Preoccupations and conflicts in contemporary psychoanalysis.London and New York:Routledge. Xing,X.C.(2015).Ronald Fairbairn and the object relations tradition.Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy in China,1,180-186. Zeavin,L.(2015).Independent psychoanalysis today.The Psychoanalytic Quarterly,84(3),789-797.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:安徽省哲学社会科学规划项目(AHSKY2018D29)。 通讯作者:王礼军,E-mail:nnuwlj8421@163.com。
更新日期/Last Update:  2019-06-30