«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:

 2019年04期

页码:

 337-344

栏目:

 认知心理学

出版日期:

 2019-07-20

文章信息/Info

Title:

 Cognitive Processes of Chinese High Familiar Metaphors with Different Semantic Properties:Evidence from an ERP Study

文章编号:

1003-5184(2019)04-0337-08

作者:

 李 莹¹; 刘 俊²; 张 灿¹; 王 悦¹

 (1.郑州大学教育学院应用心理学系,郑州 450001; 2.蚌埠医学院,蚌埠 233000)

Author(s):

 Li Ying¹; Liu Jun²; Zhang Can¹; Wang Yue¹

 (1.Department of Applied Psychology,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001; 2.Bengbu Medical College,Bengbu 233000)

关键词:

 引发性隐喻;  词源性隐喻;  一般语义;  事件相关电位;  右半球加工

Keywords:

 evoked metaphor;  derived metaphor;  literal semantic relations;  event-related potentials;  right hemisphere processing

分类号:

 B842.5

DOI:

 -

文献标识码:

 A

摘要:

 采用ERP技术考察不同性质隐喻加工的时间进程与神经机制。以词对方式呈现词源性隐喻、引发性隐喻、一般字面义,被试进行语义相关判断任务。结果发现:从引发性隐喻、一般字面义到词源性隐喻,N400平均波幅呈阶梯状递减,引发性隐喻和词源性隐喻的P600平均波幅大于一般字面义。对于不同类型词对诱发的N400,大脑左半球没有显著差异,但右半球上引发性隐喻显著大于词源性隐喻和字面义词对。并且右半球P600平均波幅更大,但三种词对间没有显著差异。结果表明:(1)日常熟悉隐喻的理解更符合平行假说但需要更多的认知资源;(2)右半球是否参与以及参与程度与隐喻性质和加工阶段有关。

Abstract:

 The present study used event-related potentials(ERPs)to examine the time-course and neural mechanisms of processing metaphorical and literal expressions.The stimuli materials were two-words expressions consisting of literal semantic relations,evoked metaphor or derived metaphor.Participants had to make judgment whether each word pair conveyed a meaningful expression or not.Meanwhile,ERPs components of the second word were recorded and off-line analyzed.The results revealed that on the N400 time window,amplitudes in a graded manner increasing from derived metaphor to literal expressions and to evoked metaphor.On the P600 time window,metaphorical expressions elicited more positive amplitudes than literal expressions but no difference between these two types of metaphor.Moreover,N400s elicited by different experimental conditions showed no significant hemisphere difference,however,evoked metaphor elicited more negative amplitudes than literal expressions in the right hemisphere.The results support the parallel hypothesis of metaphor comprehension.Metaphorical nature and processing stages may determine whether the right hemisphere involved in metaphor comprehension and the degree of its involvement.

参考文献/References

 蔡李平,王沛.(2012).“语义P600”的实质及其影响机制.心理科学,35(1),38-43. 李莹,莫雷,史大鹏,张学新.(2016).不同性质汉语隐喻句认知加工的fMRI研究.浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),46(6),33-45. 吴念阳,陈俊卿,居银,白洁,马子凤.(2012).汉语隐喻理解时程的ERPs研究.心理科学,35(4),811-816. 钟毅平,周海波,周路平,陈芸,范伟.(2011).显性度对隐喻加工的影响:事件相关电位研究.心理科学,34(3),527-531. Arzouan,Y.,Goldstein,A.,& Faust,M.(2007a).Brain waves are stethoscopes:ERP correlates of novel metaphor comprehension.Brain Research,1160,69-81. Arzouan,Y.,Goldstein,A.,& Faust,M.(2007b).Dynamics of hemispheric activity during metaphor comprehension:Electrophysiological measures.NeuroImage,36,222-231. Bohrn,I.C.,Altmann,U.,& Jacobs,A.M.(2012).Looking at the brains behind figurative language-A quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on metaphor,idiom,and irony processing.Neuropsychologia,50(11),2669-2683. Bottini,G.,Corcoran,R.,Sterzi,R.,Paulesu,E.,Schenone,P.,Scarpa,P.,...Frith,C.D.(1994).The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language:A positron emission tomography activation study.Brain,117,1241-1253. Brownell,H.H.,Simpson,T.L.,Bihrle,A.M.,Potter,H.H.,& Gardner,H.(1990).Appreciation of metaphoric alternative word meanings by left and right brain-damaged patients.Neuropsychologia,28(4),375-383. Coulson,S.,& Petten,C.V.(2002).Conceptual integration and metaphor:An event-related potential study.Memory and Cognition,30(6),958-968. De Grauwe,S.,Swaina,A.,Holcomba,P.J.,Ditmana,T.,& Kuperberg,G.R.(2010).Electrophysiological insights into the processing of nominal metaphors.Neuropsychologia,48(7),1965-1984. Federmeier,K.D.,Wlotko,E.,De Ochoa-Dewald,E.,& Kutas,M.(2006).Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing.Brain Research,1146,75-84. Giora,R.(1999).On the priority of salient meanings:Studies of literal and figurative language.Journal of Pragmatics,31(7),919-929. Giora,R.(2002).Literal vs.figurative language:Different or equal?Journal of Pragmatics,34,487-506. Giora,R.(2007).Is metaphor special?Brain and Language,100(2),111-114. Jung-Beeman,M.(2005).Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,9(11),512-518. Lai,V.T.,Dam,W.V.,Conant,L.L.,Binder,J.R.,& Desai,R.H.(2015).Familiarity differentially affects right hemisphere contributions to processing metaphors and literals.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,9(44),1-10. Lakoff,G.,& Johnson,M.(1980).Metaphors we live by.Chicago:University of Chicago Press. Lee,S.S.,& Dapretto,M.(2006).Metaphorical vs.literal word meanings:fMRI evidence against a selective role of the right hemisphere.NeuroImage,29,536-544. Mashal,N.,Faust,M.,Hendler,T.,& Jung-Beeman,M.(2007).An fMRI investigation of the neural correlates underlying the processing of novel metaphoric expressions.Brain and Language,100,115-126. Pynte,J.,Besson,M.,Robichon,F.H.,& Poli,J.(1996).The time-course of metaphor comprehension:An event-related potential study.Brain and Language,55,293-316. Sotillo,M.,Carretié,L.,Hinojosa,J.A.,Tapia,M.,Mercado,F.,López-Martín,S.,& Albert,J.(2005).Neural activity associated with metaphor comprehension:Spatial analysis.Neuroscience Letters,373,5-9. Schneider,S.,Rapp,A.M.,Haeuβinger,F.B.,Ernst,L.H.,Hamm,F.,Fallgatter,A.J.,& Ehlis,A.C.(2014).Beyond the n400:Complementary access to early neural correlates of novel metaphor comprehension using combined electrophysiological and haemodynamic measurements.Cortex,53(1),45-59. van de Meerendonk,N.,Kolk,H.H.,Vissers,C.T.,& Chwilla,D.J.(2010).Monitoring in language perception:Mild and strong conflicts elicit different ERP patterns.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,22(1),67-82.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

 基金项目:国家社会科学基金重大项目(14ZDB155),河南省哲学社会科学基金(2018BYY024),河南省软科学研究项目(192400410020),河南省教师教育课程改革研究项目(2019-JSJYZD-001)。 通讯作者:王悦,E-mail:yuezi68@126.com。

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update:  2019-07-20