我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 全面深化改革对心理学研究的应然呼唤(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2019年06期
页码:
 496-500
栏目:
 理论心理学
出版日期:
 2019-12-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Comprehensively Deepening Reform with Psychological Research's Ought to Be
文章编号:
1003-5184(2019)06-0496-05
作者:
 李永瑞1通讯作者:李永瑞; E-mail:liyongrui@bnu.edu.cn。; 张 珂2; 徐 佩3
 (1.北京师范大学政府管理学院,北京 100875; 2.空间物理重点实验室,北京 100076; 3.中国航空技术国际工程有限公司,北京 100101)
Author(s):
 Li Yongrui1; Zhang Ke2; Xu Pei3
 (1.School of Government,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875; 2.Key Laboratory of Space Physics,Beijing 100076; 3.China Aeronautical Technology International Engineering Efficiency Co.,Ltd.Beijing 100101)
关键词:
 全面深化改革;  社会治理;  心理学研究;  定性对比分析
Keywords:
 comprehensively deepening reform;  social governance;  psychological research;  qualitative comparison analysis
分类号:
 B8409
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 全面深化改革的顺利推进,离不开心理学研究的理论支持和实践指导。文章基于《中共中央关于全面深化改革若干问题的决定》(简称《决定》)的内容分析,总结提炼了推进全面深化改革亟需研究的四个心理学主题:①不同社会群体间一体感的建构与促进; ②特殊社会行为主体激励和约束机制的设计; ③重点群体多元需求指标体系的构建及配套数据库的建设; ④关键群体中核心团队建设与管理的时空特征。同时基于全面深化改革中各层级变量逻辑关系的解析,提出相关心理学研究需以不同社会行为主体需求尊重与自觉培育为实践准则,群体断层融合及其与心智共享之间的交互作用机制为理论指导,在方法上要充分重视案例研究、事件系统理论、定性对比分析(QCA)的优势发掘和整合。
Abstract:
 The smooth progress of comprehensive deepening reform is inseparable from the theoretical support and practical guidance of psychological research.Based on the content analysis of the “Decision of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on Some Major Concerning Comprehensively Deepening the Reform”(hereinafter referred to as the “decision”),this paper summarizes and refines four psychological themes that need to be studied in order to promote the comprehensive deepening reform:(1)The construction and promotion of the sense of integration between sensitive social groups.(2)The design of incentive and restraint mechanism of special social behavior subjects.(3)Construction of multi index system of key groups and construction of supporting database.(4)Temporal and spatial characteristics of core team construction and management in key groups.This paper is based on the logical relationship of all levels of variables in the comprehensive deepening reform,put forward the future research need to use the respected of demands and consciously cultivated to different social behaviors as the practice guidelines,and use the theory of interaction between swarm fault fusion and mental sharing as theoretical guidance.In the method,it should be paid attention to the advantages of case study,event system theory and qualitative comparative analysis(QCA).

参考文献/References

 
丁志刚,刘舒怀.(2018).中国特色社会主义思想的演进——基于改革开放以来历次全国党代会报告的分析.江汉论坛,3,24-28.
韩立丰,王重鸣.(2011).自我验证与人际一致性:团队多样性利用的新视角.心理科学进展,19(01),73-84.
李永瑞,张珂,徐佩,黄佳,吴璇.(2018).全面深化改革与心理学研究的“已然”和“应然”.见中国心理学会编著.2016-2017心理学学科发展报告.北京:中国科学技术出版社.
刘星,李新建.(2015).基于扎根理论的多元雇佣工作群体的雇佣身份断层与激活因素研究.管理学报,12(7),1001-1011.
苏敬勤,张琳琳.(2015).理论构建型案例研究规范性评估——基于内容分析的对比研究.管理评论,27(8),223-233.
卫旭华,刘咏梅,岳柳青.(2015).高管团队权力不平等对企业创新强度的影响——有调节的中介效应.南开管理评论,18(3),24-33.
杨玉芳,郭永玉.(2017).心理学在社会治理中的作用.中国科学院院刊,32(2),107-116.
俞可平.(2018).中国的治理改革(1978-2018).武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),3,48-59.
张成福.(2018).政府治理创新与政府治理的新典范:中国政府改革40 年.国家行政学院学报,2,33-39,135.
张驰,郑晓杰,王凤彬.(2017).定性比较分析法在管理学构型研究中的应用:述评与展望.外国经济与管理,39(4),68-83.
张景焕,刘欣,任菲菲.(2016).团队多样性与组织支持对团队创造力的影响.心理学报,48(12),1551-1560.
郑言,李猛.(2014).推进国家治理体系与国家治理能力现代化.吉林大学(社会科学学报),25(2),5-12.
Chrobot-Mason,D.,et al.(2009).The challenge of leading on unstable ground:Triggers that activate social identity faultlines.Human Relations,62(11),1763-1794.
Cooke,N.J.,Gorman,J.C.,Myers,C.W.,& Duran,J.L.(2013).Interactive team cognition.Cognitive Science,37,255-285.
Lacey,R.,& Fiss,P.C.(2009).Comparative organizational analysis across multiple levels:A set-theoretic approach.In D.A.Whetten,T.Felin,& B.G.King(Eds.),Studying differences between organizations:Comparative approaches to organizational research.Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Lau,D.C.,& Murnighan,J.K.(1998).Demographic diversity and faultlines:The compositional dynamics of organizational groups.Academy of Management Review,23(2),325-340.
Lim,B.C.,& Klein,K.J.(2006).Team mental models and team performance:A field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy.Journal of Organizational Behavior,27(4),403-418.
Milliken,F.J.,& Martins,L.L.(1996).Searching for common threads:Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups.Academy of Management Review,21(2),402-433.
Mohammed,S.,Ferzandi,L.,& Hamilton,K.(2010).Metaphor no more:A 15year review of the team mental model construct.Journal of Management,36(4),876-910.
Morgeson,F.P.,Mitchell,T.R.,& Liu,D.(2015).Event system theory:An event-oriented approach to the organizational sciences.Academy of Management Review,40(4),515-537.
Ragin,C.C.(2014).The comparative method:Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies.University of California Press.
Thatcher,S.M.B.,Jehn,K.A.,& Zanutto,E.(2003).Cracks in diversity research:The effects of diversity faultlines on conflict and performance.Group Decision & Negotiation,12(3),217-241.
Uitdewilligen,S.,Waller,M.J.,& Pitariu,A.H.(2013).Mental model updating and team adaptation.Small Group Research,44(2),127-158.
Walton,G.M.,& Dweck,C.S.(2009).Solving social problems like a psychologist.Perspectives on Psychological Science,4(1),101-102.
Zhang,J.,Liang,Q.,Zhang,Y.,et al.(2016).Team faultline:Types,configuration and influence-evidence from China.International Journal of Conflict Management,28(3),346-367.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 -
更新日期/Last Update:  2019-12-30