我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 人际信任与合作的培养:基于信任和公共品博弈的实验研究(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2019年06期
页码:
 533-539
栏目:
 社会与应用心理学
出版日期:
 2019-12-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Cultivation of Interpersonal Trust and Cooperation: An Experimental Study based on Trust and Public Goods Game
文章编号:
1003-5184(2019)06-0533-07
作者:
 何志芳1; 2; 杨 艳2; 刘建平1
 (1.江西师范大学心理学院,南昌 330022; 2.江西中医药大学人文学院,南昌 330004)
Author(s):
 He Zhifang1; 2; Yang Yan2; Liu Jianping1
 (1.School of Psychology,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang 330022; 2.College of Humanities,Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Nanchang 330004)
关键词:
 人际信任;  强化;  替代强化;  博弈实验
Keywords:
 interpersonal trust;  reinforcement;  substitution reinforcement;  game experiment
分类号:
 B848
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 研究运用经济行为学的博弈实验法,探索了不同人际信任和合作的培养模式的效果问题。实验一和实验二分别采用两人信任博弈和六人公共品博弈实验范式,探讨了替代强化、直接强化和对照组等不同培养模式下的信任和合作关系变化情况。研究结果显示:1、直接强化组的培养效果好于替代强化组; 2、从实验范式角度而言,两人信任博弈范式下的培养效果优于六人公共品博弈范式; 3、相比于直接强化组而言,替代强化组的培养效果不受实验范式和实验情境的影响,具有跨实验情境的一致性和稳定性。因此,在人际信任和合作关系的培养过程中,相比于直接强化模式更容易受时空的限制和实验效应的影响,观察学习等替代强化的模式更具有可行性及推广性。
Abstract:
 The study uses the game experiment method of economic behavior to explore the effects of different interpersonal trust and cooperation training models.Experiments 1 and 2 respectively use the two-person trust game and the six-person public goods game experiment paradigm to explore the changes in trust and cooperation between different training modes such as substitution strengthening,direct reinforcement and control group.The results show that:1.Special trust relationship can be established and cultivated in the way of direct reinforcement and alternative reinforcement,and the former's training effect is better than the latter; 2.From the experimental paradigm perspective,the training effect of the two people in the trust game paradigm is better than that of the six people.Game paradigm; 3,compared with the direct strengthening group,the training effect of the alternative strengthening group is not affected by the experimental paradigm and experimental context,and has the consistency and stability across experimental situations.Therefore,in the process of cultivating interpersonal trust and cooperation,compared with the direct reinforcement mode,it is more susceptible to the limitations of time and space and experimental effects.The model of alternative reinforcement such as observational learning is more feasible and popular.

参考文献/References

 
埃里克·尤斯拉纳.(2006).信任的道德基础.北京:中国社会科学出版杜.
陈琦,刘儒德.(2007).当代教育心理学(第2版)/普通高等教育“十一五”国家级规划教材.北京:北京师范大学出版社.
窦凯.(2016).感知社会正念:有效促进合作的心理机制(博士学位论文).暨南大学.
胡荣,林本.(2013).社会网络与信任.湖南师范大学(社会科学学报),42(a04),59-65.
戚艳艳,伍海燕,刘勋.(2017).社会价值取向对亲社会行为的影响:来自行为和神经影像学的证据.科学通报,62(11),1136-1144.
史燕伟,徐富明,罗教讲,等.(2015).行为经济学中的信任:形成机制及影响因素.心理科学进展,23(7),1236-1244.
王思琦.(2013).政治信任、人际信任与非传统政治参与.公共行政评论,6(2),22-51.
阎爽.(2017).政治信任、人际信任对公众非传统政治参与的影响——以中国大陆为例.青年时代,(24).92-96.
张大均.(2015).教育心理学.北京:人民教育出版社.
Chang,L.J.,Doll,B.B.,van't Wout,M.,Frank,M.J.,& Sanfey,A.G.(2010).Seeing is believing:Trust worthiness as a dynamic belief.Cognitive Psychology,1(2),87-105.
Rietzschel,E.F.,Wisse,B.,& Rus,D.(2017).Puppet masters in the lab:Experimental methods in leadership research.In Handbook of Methods in Leadership Research.Edward Elgar Publishing,48-72.
Yu,M.,Saleem,M.,& Gonzalez,C.(2014).Developing trust:First impressions and experience.Journal of Economic Psychology,43(3),16-29.
Yu,Y.,Yang,Y.,& Jing,F.(2017).The role of the third party in trust repair process.Journal of Business Research,78(2017),2-241.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:2018年江西省高校人文社科项目(XL18101)。 通讯作者:刘建平,E-mail:liujianping@jxnu.edu.cn。
更新日期/Last Update:  2019-12-30