我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 心真的会“软”吗?软硬感受与语义改变道德判断(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2019年06期
页码:
 571-574
栏目:
 社会与应用心理学
出版日期:
 2019-12-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
 A Tender Heart:The Effect of Tough and Tender on Moral Judgment
文章编号:
1003-5184(2019)06-0571-04
作者:
 吴言动1; 喻 丰2; 彭凯平1; 3; 刘书青4
 (1.清华大学心理学系,北京 100084; 2.西安交通大学人文社会科学学院社会心理学研究所,西安 710049; 3.Department of Psychology,University of California,Berkeley,CA 94720; 4.天津大学智能与计算学部,天津 300072)
Author(s):
 Wu Yandong1; Yu Feng2; Peng Kaiping1; 3; Liu Shuqing4
 (1.Department of Psychology,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084; 2.School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084; 3.Department of Psychology,University of California,Berkeley,CA 94720; 4.College of Intelligence and Computing,Tianj
关键词:
 软;  硬;  具身认知;  隐喻;  道德;  道德判断
Keywords:
 tender;  tough;  embodied cognition;  metaphor;  morality;  moral judgment
分类号:
 B848
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 近年来诸多研究发现,物理变量对心理变量尤其是道德会产生影响,而其机制通常是具身认知与隐喻语言两种。本研究意在通过软硬的具身感受以及软硬的隐喻式意义联系来探讨它对于道德判断的影响。实验一通过操纵被试的软硬身体感受,发现感受到软的被试会比感受到硬的被试更倾向于作出义务论判断。而实验二通过启动被试的软硬语义联接,发现在启动了软的意义之后,对比与启动了硬的意义来说,被试体验到了更少的厌恶情绪,并对同样的道德错误表现得更宽容。这表明软与硬这对物理变量在具身认知与隐喻语言两种机制上都对道德判断起到了影响。
Abstract:
 Previous research found that,even the tiny change of external factor could influence moral judgment and moral behavior.The underlying mechanism of the physical-psychological connection is embodied cognition and metaphorical language.Embodied cognition emphasize the body experience and metaphorical language emphasize the representational connection of meaning.Experiment 1 manipulate the body experience of participants and found that,the participants who stand on a tender cushion tend to make deontology judgment.Experiment 2 prime the meaning of tender and tough,found that,participants in the tender priming tend to tolerate moral wrongness,feel less disgust and make less punishment.The results indicate that,tough and tender could influence our moral judgment through embodied cognition and metaphorical language.

参考文献/References

 
彭凯平,喻丰.(2012).道德的心理物理学:现象、机制与意义.中国社会科学,(12),28-45.
汪向东.(1999).心理卫生评定量表手册.中国心理卫生杂志社.
喻丰,彭凯平,韩婷婷,柴方圆,柏阳.(2011).道德困境之困境:情与理的辩争.心理科学进展,19,1702-1712.
Bartels,D.M.,& Pizarro,D.A.(2011).The mismeasure of morals:Antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas.Cognition,121(1),154-161.
Chasteen,A.L.,Burdzy,D.C.,& Pratt,J.(2010).Thinking of god moves attention.Neuropsychologia,48,627-630.
Christie,R.,& Geis,F.(1970).Scale construction.Studies in Machiavellianism,10-34.
Haidt,J.(2001).The emotional dog and its rational tail:A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.Psychological Review,108(4),814-834.
Liljenquist,K.A.,Zhong,C.,& Galinsky,A.D.(2010).The smell of virtue:Clean scents promote reciprocity and charity.Psychological Science,21,381-383.
Schnall,S.,Haidt,J.,Clore,G.L.,& Jordan,A.H.(2008).Disgust as embodied moral judgment.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,34(8),1096-1109.
Slepian,M.L.,Weisbuch,M.,Rule,N.O.,& Ambady,N.(2011).Tough and tender embodied categorization of gender.Psychological Science,22(1),26-28.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:全国教育科学“十二五”规划2014年度青年课题“慕课(MOOC)用户体验的实证研究”(ECA140372)。 通讯作者:喻丰,E-mail:cchedu@126.com。
更新日期/Last Update:  2019-12-30