我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 生成与动力:具身认知研究中的互动观(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2020年06期
页码:
 483-488
栏目:
 
出版日期:
 2020-12-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Enaction and Dynamics:The Theory of Interaction in Embodied Cognition
文章编号:
1003-5184(2020)06-0483-06
作者:
 叶浩生 国礼羽 麻彦坤
 (广州大学教育学院,广州 510006)
Author(s):
 Ye Haosheng Guo Liyu Ma Yankun
 (College of Education,Guangzhou University,Guangzhou 510006)
关键词:
 具身认知;  生成认知;  互动论;  肉身间性
Keywords:
 embodied cognition;  enactive cognition;  the theory of interaction;  intercorporality
分类号:
 B8409
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 从方法论上讲,认知研究中的个体主义把研究的焦点放在个体身上,倾向于从个体内部寻求对社会行为的解释。与个体主义取向不同的是,具身认知中的互动观更注重人际和社会互动对于理解他人的重要作用。心理学中的生态学方法最早关注了环境与有机体之间的互动对知觉产生的影响。生成认知在此基础上更进一步,认为互动不仅发生在有机体与环境之间,而且表现为主体与主体的交互影响,两个主体间的交互不是两个笛卡尔式心灵的对话,交互的主体是身体,是一种“肉身间性”的过程。具身认知研究中的互动观强调身心一体论,反对身心二元论,在方法论上表现出反还原论的特色。
Abstract:
 Individualism in cognitive research focuses on individuals and tends to seek explanations for social behaviors from inside of the individual.The theory of interaction in embodied cognition,instead,focuses on the important role of interpersonal and social interaction in understanding others.The ecological approach in psychology was originally concerned with the effects of the interaction between the environment and the organism on perception.Based on this,enactive cognition further believes that interaction not only takes place between the organism and the environment,but also manifests as the interaction between the subject and the subject.The interaction between the two subjects is not the dialogue of two cartesian minds,but the two bodies,which is a process of “intercorporality”.The interaction view of embodied cognition emphasizes the monism of mind-body,and opposes the dualism of mind-body.

参考文献/References

 何静.(2017).生成的主体间性:一种参与式的意义建构进路.哲学动态,2,87-92.
瓦雷拉,汤普森,罗施.(2010).具身心智:认知科学与人类经验(李恒威 等译).杭州:浙江大学出版社.
叶浩生.(2019).身体的教育价值:现象学的视角.教育研究,40(10),41-51.
张茗.(2016).生成知觉观研究(博士论文).南京:南京大学.
Di Paolo,E.A.,& DeJaegher,H.(2012).The interactive brain hypothesis.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,6,163.
Froese,T.,& Di Paolo,E.A.(2011).The enactive approach:Theoretical sketches from cell to society.Pragmatics & Cognition,19(1),1-36.
Hari,R.,Henriksson,L.,Malinen,S.,& Parkkonen,L.(2015).Centrality of social interaction in human brain function.Neuron,88(1),181-193.
Paolucci,C.(2020).A radical enactivist approach to social cognition.In the extended theory of cognitive creativity(pp.59-74).Springer,Cham.
Peppers-Bates,S.(2020).Another mind-body Problem:A history of racial non-being by John Harfouch.Journal of the History of Philosophy,58(1),183-184.
Roberts,T.,Krueger,J.,& Glackin,S.(2019).Psychiatry beyond the brain:Externalism,mental health,and autistic spectrum disorder.Philosophy,Psychiatry,& Psychology,26(3),51.
Schiavio,A.,& De Jaegher,H.(2017).Participatory sense-making in joint musical practice.In M.Lesaffre,M.Leman,& P.J.Maes(Eds.),The routledge companion to embodied music interaction.Springer,Cham.
Schilbach,L.,Timmermans,B.,Reddy,V.,Costall,A.,Bente,G.,Schlicht,T.,& Vogeley,K.(2013).Toward a second-person neuroscience 1.Behavioral and Brain Sciences,36(4),393-414.
Tanaka,S.(2015).Intercorporeality as a theory of social cognition.Theory & Psychology,25(4),455-472.
Wimmer,H.,& Perner,J.(1983).Beliefs about beliefs:Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception.Cognition,13,103-128.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:国家社科基金后期资助项目重点项目(2OFTYA002),国家自然科学基金项目(72001045)。
通讯作者:麻彦坤,E-mail:myk1966@sina.com。
更新日期/Last Update:  2020-12-25