我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 内容和形式对毒品成瘾者条件推理的影响(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2020年06期
页码:
 524-530
栏目:
 
出版日期:
 2020-12-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Impact of Content and Form on Conditional Reasoning of Drugaddicts
文章编号:
1003-5184(2020)06-0524-07
作者:
 曾晓青12何 磊12
 (1.江西师范大学心理学院,江西省心理与认知科学重点实验室,南昌 330022; 2.江西师范大学心理研究所,南昌 330022)
Author(s):
 Zeng Xiaoqing12He Lei12
 (1.School of Psychology,Lab of Psychology and Cognition Science of Jiangxi,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang 330022; 2.Psychology Institute,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang 330022)
关键词:
 毒品成瘾 条件推理 四卡片形式 社会契约
Keywords:
 drug addiction conditional reasoning four-card form social contract
分类号:
 B842.5
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 本研究通过比较推理内容与推理形式对毒品成瘾者推理成绩的影响,以探究影响毒品成瘾者能力成绩的主要内在机制。实验采用了2(四卡片形式vs选择项形式)×2(描述性规则vs社会契约规则)混合设计,以240名男性戒毒人员为研究对象,考察他们在不同推理内容与不同推理形式下的条件推理作业成绩。结果发现:(1)就规则内容来看,描述性规则内容在选择项形式上的得分好于四卡片形式,社会契约规则内容在两种呈现形式下的成绩没有显著差异;(2)就规则呈现形式来看,四卡片形式下的描述性规则得分显著地低于社会契约规则得分; 选择项形式下两类规则内容得分无显著差异。结果表明:毒品成瘾者的条件推理行为既受到推理内容的影响,也受到逻辑规则呈现形式的影响。
Abstract:
 In current study,the effect of content and form of reasoning on the reasoning capability of drug addicts is compared to investigate the main internal mechanisms that affect the reasoning ability of drug addicts.Thisstudy use a hybrid design of 2(four-card form vs option form)×2(descriptive rules vs social contrast rules).240 male drug addicts were used to examine their conditional reasoning performance under different reasoning content and different forms of reasoning.The result shows that:(1)in terms of the rule content,the score of descriptive rule content in the form of option was better than that of four-card form,and there was no significant difference in the score of the social contract rule content in this two forms.(2)In terms of two presentation forms,the score of descriptive rules under the four-card form is significantly lower than that under the social contract rule; there was no significant difference in the scores of the two types of rule content under the option form.The result showed:conditioned reasoning behavior of drug addicts is influenced both by the content of their reasoning and by the presentation of logical rules.

参考文献/References

 胡竹菁,胡笑羽.(2015).人类推理的“推理题与推理知识双重结构模型”.心理学探新,35(3),212-216.
胡竹菁,胡笑羽.(2018).中外两种主要推理模型的实验再比较研究.心理学探新,38(1),31-35.
胡竹菁,胡笑羽.(2019).中外两种推理理论的实验比较研究.心理学探新,39(6),501-507.
胡竹菁,朱丽萍.(2007).人类推理的心理学研究(pp.33-35,55-76).北京:北京高等教育出版社.
王桂琴,孙昌识.(1998).命题检验中的推理过程及困难原因的实验研究.心理科学进展,(2),57-63.
曾维希.(2005).四卡问题的匹配表征与激活效应的分离实验(p.655).第十届全国心理学学术大会论文摘要集.
曾晓青.(2013).成本-收益结构条件推理的心理学研究(博士毕业论文).江西师范大学,南昌.
曾晓青,陈美荣,胡竹菁.(2015).条件推理的社会契约理论研究述评.心理学探新,35(5),17-23.
曾晓青,陈美荣,黄仁辉,胡竹菁.(2015).专家与新手在成本-收益结构条件推理上的差异比较.江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),48(2),108-120.
张清芳,朱滢.(2000).工作记忆和推理.心理学动态,8(1),12-17.
Ari?s,R.J.,Groot,W.,& van den Brink,H.M.(2015).Improving reasoning skills in secondary history education by working memory training.British Educational Research Journal,41(2),210-228.
Brisson,J.,Markovits,H.,Robert,S.,& Serge,W.(2018).Reasoning from an incompatibility:False dilemma fallacies and content effects.Memory & Cognition,46,657-670.
Colzato,L.S.,Huizinga,M.,& Hommel,B.(2009).Recreational cocaine poly drug use impairs cognitive flexibility but not working memory.Psychopharmacology,207(2),225.
Cosmides,L.(1989).The logic of social exchange:Has natural selection shaped how humans reason?Studies with the Wason selection task.Cognition,(31),187-276.
Cosmides,L.,& Tooby,J.(1989).Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture,Part II.Case study:A computational theory of social exchange.Ethology and Sociobiology,(10),51-97.
Cosmides,L.,& Tooby,J.(1992).Cognitive adaptations for social exchange.The Adapted Mind:Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture,163,163-228.
Cosmides,L.,& Tooby,J.(2005).Neurocognitive adaptations designed for social exchange.InD.M.Buss(Ed.),Handbook of evolutionary psychology(pp.584-627).Hoboken,NJ:John Wiley & Sons.
Cosmides,L.,& Tooby,J.(2013).Evolutionary psychology:New perspectives on cognition and motivation.Annual Review of Psychology,64,201-229.
Cosmides,L.,& Tooby,J.(2015).Adaptations for reasoning about social exchange.The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology,(11),1-44.
Ding,L.,Wei,X.,& Mollohan,K.(2016).Does higher education improve student scientific reasoning skills?International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,14(4),619-634.
Ermer,E.,Guerin,S.A.,Cosmides,L.,Tooby,J.,& Miller,M.B.(2006).Theory of mind broad and narrow:Reasoning about social exchange engages ToM areas,precautionary reasoning does not.Soc Neurosci,1,196-219.
Evans,J.St.B.T.(2002).Logic and human reasoning:An assessment of the deduction paradigm.Psychological Bulletin,(128),978-996.
Fang-Ying,Y.(2017).Examining the reasoning of conflicting science information from the information processing perspective—An eye movement analysis.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,(11),1347-1372.
Fiddick,L.(2003).Is there a faculty of deontic reasoning?A critical re-evaluation of abstract deontic versions of the Wason selection task.In D.Over(Ed.),Evolution and the psychology of thinking(pp.33-60).New York:Holt.
Fiddick,L.,Brase,G.L.,Cosmides,L.,& Tooby,J.(2017).Rethinking relevance:Repetition priming reveals the psychological reality of adaptive specializations for reasoning.Evolution and Human Behavior,38,366-375.
Finn,P.R.,& Hall,J.(2004).Cognitive ability and risk for alcoholism:Short-term memory capacity and intelligence moderate personality risk for alcohol problems.Journal of Abnormal Psychology,113(4),569.
Franken,I.H.,Rosso,M.,& Van Honk,J.(2003).Selective memory for alcohol cues in alcoholics and its relation to craving.Cognitive Therapy and Research,27(4),481-488.
Goldstein,R.Z.,& Volkow,N.D.(2002).Drug addiction and its underlying neurobiological basis:Neuroimaging evidence for the involvement of the frontal cortex.American Journal of Psychiatry,159(10),1642-1652.
Griggs,R.A.,& Cox,J.R.(1983).The effects of problem content and negation on Wason’s selection task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,35(3),519-533.
Hall,M.G.,Hauson,A.O.,Wollman,S.C.,Allen,K.E.,Connors,E.J.,Stern,M.J.,Kimmel,C.L.,Stephan,R.A.,Sarkissians,S.,Barlet,B.D.,& Grant,I.(2018).Neuropsychological comparisons of cocaine versus methamphetamine users:A research synthesis and meta-analysis.American Journal of Drug & Alcohol Abuse,44(3),277-293.
Houwer,J.D.(2019).Moving beyond system 1 and system 2.Experimental Psychology,66(4),257-265.
Kornreich,C.,Delle-Vigne,D.,Brevers,D.,Tecco,J.,Campanella,S.,No?l,X.,& Ermer,E.(2017).Conditional reasoning in schizophrenic patients.Evolutionary Psychology,15(3),147-470.
Kornreich,C.,Delle-Vigne,D.,Campanella,S.,No?l,X.,Papageorgiou,C.,Brown,O.,& Ermer,E.(2012).Conditional reasoning difficulties in polysubstance-dependent patients.Psychology of Addictive Behaviors,26(3),665.
Lafleur,A.,C?té,L.,& Leppink,J.(2015).Influences of OSCE design on students’ diagnostic reasoning.Medical Education,49(2),203-214.
Lebedev,A.V.,Nilsson,J.,& L?vdén,M.(2018).Working memory and reasoning benefit from different modes of large-scale brain dynamics in healthy older adults.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,30(7),1033-1046.
Little,D.R.,Lewandowsky,S.,& Craig,S.(2014).Working memory capacity and fluid abilities:The more difficult the item,the more more is better.Frontiers in Psychology,5,239.
Morsanyi,K.,Mccormack,T.,& O’Mahony,E.(2018).The link between deductive reasoning and mathematics.Thinking & Reasoning,24(2),234-257.
Newell,A.,& Simon,H.A.(1972).Human problem solving.Englewood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice Hall.
Nickerson,R.S.,Butler,S.F.,& Barch,D.H.(2017).Set size,assertion form,thematic content and sampling in the selection task.Thinking & Reasoning,23(2),134-157.
Nigg,J.T.,Wong,M.M.,Martel,M.M.,Jester,J.M.,Puttler,L.I.,Glass,J.M.,...& Zucker,R.A.(2006).Poor response inhibition as a predictor of problem drinking and illicit drug use in adolescents at risk for alcoholism and other substance use disorders.Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry,45(4),468-475.
Rassin,E.(2018).Fundamental failure to think logically about scientific questions:An illustration of tunnel vision with the application of Wason’s Card Selection Test to criminal evidence.Applied Cognitive Psychology,32(4),506-511.
Sasayama,S.(2016).Is a ‘complex’ task really complex?Validating the assumption of cognitive task complexity.The Modern Language Journal,100(1),231-254.
Stephan,R.A.,Alhassoon,O.M.,Allen,K.E.,et al.(2017).Meta-analyses of clinical neuropsychological tests of executive dysfunction and impulsivity in alcohol use disorder.The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse,43(1),24-43.
Verschueren,N.,Schaeken,W.,& d’Ydewall,G.(2004).Everyday conditional reasoning with working memory preload.Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society,26(26),5-8.
Wanmaker,S.,Leijdesdorff,S.M.J.,Geraerts,E.,et al.(2018).The efficacy of a working memory training in substance use patients:A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial.Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology,(1),1-14.
Wason,P.(1966).Reasoning.In B.Foss(Ed.),New horizons in psychology(vol.1,pp.135-151).Harmondsworth,U.K:Penguin.
Wason,P.C.,& Shapiro,D.(1971).Natural and contrived experience in a reasoning problem.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,23(1),63-71.
William,L.D.,& Jessica,L.T.(2013).The autobiography of addiction:Autobiographical reasoning and psychological adjustment in abstinent alcoholics.Memory,21(1),64-78.
Wong,T.,& Tin-Yau,T.(2018).Is conditional reasoning related to mathematical problem solving?Developmental Science,(12),e12644.
Wszalek,J.A.,& Turkstra,L.S.(2019).Comprehension of legal language by adults with and without traumatic brain injury.Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation,33(7),934-946.
Xiang,T.,Lohrenz,T.,& Montague,P.R.(2013).Computational substrates of norms and their violations during social exchange.The Journal of Neuroscience:The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience,33,1099-1108.
Yücel,M.,Lubman,D.I.,Solowij,N.,& Brewer,W.J.(2007).Understanding drug addiction:A neuropsychological perspective.Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry,41(12),957-968.
Zonca,J.,Coricelli,G.,& Polonio,L.(2020).Gaze data reveal individual differences in relational representation processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,46(2),257-279.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:国家社会科学基金项目(19BGL230),江西省高校人文社科规划项目(XL17103)阶段性成果。
通讯作者:曾晓青,E-mail:zxq3701@163.com。
更新日期/Last Update:  2020-12-25