我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 文化的考量:积极心理学当下之困与未来(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2020年05期
页码:
 387-391
栏目:
 理论心理学
出版日期:
 2020-11-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Cultural Considerations:The Predicament and Future of Positive Psychology
文章编号:
1003-5184(2020)05-0387-05
作者:
 孟维杰1; 张晓书2; 孟建伟3
 (1.鲁东大学教育科学学院,烟台 264025; 2.鲁东大学外国语学院,烟台 264025; 3.中国科学院大学人文学院,北京 100049)
Author(s):
 Meng Weijie1; Zhang Xiaoshu2; Meng Jianwei3
 (1.School of Education Science of Ludong University,Yantai 264025; 2.School of Foreign Language of Ludong University,Yantai 264025; 3.School of Humanities University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049)
关键词:
 积极;  积极初心;  失序;  文化转向
Keywords:
 positive;  positive initial mind;  disorder;  cultural turning
分类号:
 B8409
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 积极心理学正在经历着从闲庭信步到临渊而立的转向。这种转向,既凸显了主流心理学面临着来自以积极心理学为代表的新兴势力的挑战与压力,同时,也表明积极心理学自身暴露出的短板与局限,以及由此向文化寻求支持的一种诉求,更是为寻求破局而作出的努力。可以预见,积极心理学将会以脑认知革命到来为契机,不断理顺积极心理、脑和文化环境三者关系,实现对心理学范式变革的显著的引领作用。
Abstract:
 Positive psychology is experiencing a shift from from strolling to the edge of abyss.This shift not only highlights the challenges and pressures of traditional mainstream psychology from emerging disciplines represented by positive psychology,but also indicates the shortcomings and limitations of positive psychology itself,and the need to seek culture from this.An appeal for support is even more an effort.It is foreseeable that positive psychology will take the opportunity of the brain cognitive revolution to continuously straighten out the relationship between positive psychology,brain and cultural environment,and realize a significant leading role in the transformation of the psychological paradigm.

参考文献/References

 孟维杰.(2008).论心理学文化品性.心理科学,31(1),253-255.
任俊,叶浩生.(2006).当代积极心理学运动存在的几个问题.心理科学进展,14(5),787-794.
翟贤亮,葛鲁嘉.(2017).积极心理学的建设性冲突与视域转换.心理科学进展,25(2),290-297.
Grant,A.M.,& Schwartz,B.(2011).Too much of a good thing:The challenge and opportunity of the inverted U.Perspectives on Psychological Science,6,61-76.
Held,B.S.(2002).The tyranny of the positive attitude in America:Observation and speculation.Journal of Clinical Psychology,58,965-991.
Held,B.S.(2004).The negative side of positive psychology.Journal of Humanistic Psychology,44,9-46.
Joseph,S.,& Linley,P.A.(2006).Comment:Positive psychology versus the medical model?American Psychologist,61,332-333.
Joshanloo,M.(2014).Eastern conceptualizations of happiness:Fundamental differences with western views.Journal of Happiness Studies,15,475-493.
Martin,J.,& Sugarman,J.(2001).Moderning,postmoderning and psychology.American Psychologist,4,370-371.
McNulty,J.K.,& Incham,F.D.(2012).The pitfalls of valenced labels and the benefits of properly calibrated psychological flexibility.American Psychologist,67,576-577.
Nussbaum,M.C.(2008).Who is the happy warrior?Philosophy poses questions to ppsychology.Journal of Legal Studies,37(S2),81-113.
Resnick,S.,Warmoth,A.,& Serlin,I.A.(2001).The humanistic psychology and positive psychology connection:Implications for psychotherapy.Journal of Humanistic Psychology,41(1),73-101.
Seligman,M.E.P.(2002).Authentic happiness(pp.137,265-268,136-140).New York:The Free Press.
Seligman,M.E.P.(2003).Foreword:The past and future of positive psychology.In C.L.M.Keyes & J.Haidt(Eds.),Flourishing:Positive psychology and the life well-lived.Washington DC:Published by APA,2003.xvii.
Seligman,M.E.P.,Parks,A.C.,& Steen,T.(2004).A balanced psychology and a full life.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.Biological Sciences,359,1379-1381.
Sheldon,K.M.,& King,L.(2001).Why psychology is necessary.American Psychologist,56(3),216-217.
Weinstein,N.D.,Marcus,S.E.,& Moser,R.P.(2005).Smokers' unrealistic optimism about their risk.Tobacco Control,14,55-59.
Wong,P.T.P.(2011).Positive psychology 2.0:Towards a balanced interactive model of the good life.Canadian Psychology,52(2),69-81.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 -
更新日期/Last Update:  2020-10-20