我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 中文版正念教学量表的信效度检验(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2020年05期
页码:
 444-450
栏目:
 心理统计与测量
出版日期:
 2020-11-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
 The Chinese Version of Mindfulness in Teaching Scale:An Examination of Reliability and Validity
文章编号:
1003-5184(2020)05-0444-07
作者:
 丁俊浩 赵 甜 周 晖
 (中山大学心理学系,广州 510275)
Author(s):
 Ding Junhao Zhao Tian Zhou Hui
 (Department of Psychology,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510275)
关键词:
 正念教学量表 中国教师 信度 效度
Keywords:
 mindfulness in teaching scale Chinese teacher reliability validity
分类号:
 B841.2
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 目的:修订中文版正念教学量表并检验其在中国教师群体中的信效度。方法:使用样本1(n1=302)进行项目分析探索性因素分析; 样本2(n2=185)进行验证性因素分析; 使用样本1和2检验量表的跨组测量不变性,并考察效标效度; 样本3(n3=30)进行重测信度检验。结果:中文版正念教学量表为二因子结构,包括个体内正念和人际间正念两个分量表,具有良好的结构效度、效标效度及信度。且该量表在小学、初中及高中教师中达到部分测量强等值。结论:该量表适宜在我国中小学教师群体中使用。
Abstract:
 Objective:The purpose of the study is to offer a revised Chinese version of the Mindfulness in Teaching Scale(MTS-C),and to examine its reliability and validity in Chinese teachers.Method:Data from sample 1(n1=302)was used for item analysis and exploratory factor analysis.Data from sample 2(n2=185)was tested for confirmatory factor analysis.The combined data of sample 1 and sample 2 were further tested for measurement invariance across teaching grade and criterion validity.The test-retest reliability was analyzed by using data from sample3(n3=30).Results:The revised Chinese version of Mindfulness in Teaching Scale consisted of 16 items,and included two subscales:teacher intrapersonal mindfulness and teacher interpersonal mindfulness.This two-factor model fitted data well.In addition,the factorial invariance ofthe model across teachers from primary school,middle school and high school was verified.MTS-C also illustrated satisfactory internal consistency reliability,test-retest reliability,as well as good criterion validity.Conclusion:The Chinese version of Mindfulness in Teaching Scale was appropriate for measuring mindfulness in teaching of Chinese teachers from primary,middle and high school.

参考文献/References

 马娟.(2005).中小学教师职业压力、应对方式与课堂互动行为关系的研究(硕士论文).西南师范大学.
王阳,王才康,温忠麟,等.(2017).共情和同情量表在中国幼儿教师样本中的效度和信度.中国临床心理学杂志,31(6),37-40.
伍新春,齐亚静,余蓉蓉,等.(2016).中小学教师职业倦怠问卷的进一步修订.中国临床心理学杂志,24(5),856-860.
俞国良,辛涛,申继亮.(1995).教师教学效能感:结构与影响因素的研究.心理学报,27(2),159-165.
Baer,R.A.,Smith,G.T.,Hopkins,J.,Krietemeyer,J.,& Toney,L.(2006).Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness.Assessment,13,27-45.
Braun,S.S.,Roeser,R.W.,Mashburn,A.J.,& Skinner,E.(2018).Middle school teachers' mindfulness,occupational health and well-being,and the quality of teacher-student interactions.Mindfulness,10(2),245-255.
Brown,K.W.,& Ryan,R.M.(2003).The benefits of being present:Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,84(4),822-848.
Chambers,R.,Lo,B.C.Y.,& Allen,N.B.(2008).The impact of intensive mindfulness training on attentional control,cognitive style,and affect.Cognitive Therapy and Research,32(3),303-322.
Frank,J.L.,Jennings,P.A.,& Greenberg,M.T.(2016).Validation of the mindfulness in teaching scale.Mindfulness,7(1),155-163.
Frank,J.L.,Reibel,D.,Broderick,P.,& Metz,S.(2015).The effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction on educator stress and well-being:Results from a pilot study.Mindfulness,6(2),208-216.
Jennings,P.A.,& Greenberg,M.T.(2009).The prosocial classroom:Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes.Review of Educational Research,79(1),491-525.
Kabat Zinn,J.(2003).Mindfulness-based interventions in context:Past,present,and future.Clinical Psychology:Science and Practice,10(2),144-156.
Karremans,J.C.,Schellekens,M.P.,& Kappen,G.(2017).Bridging the sciences of mindfulness and romantic relationships:A theoretical model and research agenda.Personality and Social Psychology Review,21(1),29-49.
Kim,E.,& Singh,N.N.(2018).Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the mindfulness in teaching scale.Mindfulness,9(1),344-351.
Lyvers,M.,Makin,C.,Toms,E.,Thorberg,F.A.,& Samios,C.(2014).Trait mindfulness in relation to emotional self-regulation and executive function.Mindfulness,5(6),619-625.
Pan,J.,Liang,Y.,Zhou,H.,& Wang,Y.(2019).Mindful parenting assessed in mainland China:Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the interpersonal mindfulness in parenting scale.Mindfulness,10(8),1629-1641.
Parent,J.,Mckee,L.G.,Rough,J.N.,& Forehand,R.(2016).The association of parent mindfulness with parenting and youth psychopathology across three developmental stages.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,44(1),191-202.
Pratscher,S.D.,Rose,A.J.,Markovitz,L.,& Bettenco,A.(2018).Interpersonal mindfulness:Investigating mindfulness in interpersonal interactions,co-rumination,and friendship quality.Mindfulness,9(4),1206-1215.
Pratscher,S.D.,Wood,P.K.,King,L.A.,& Bettencourt,B.A.(2019).Interpersonal mindfulness:Scale development and initial construct validation.Mindfulness,10(3),1044-1061.
Roeser,R.W.,Schonert-Reichl,K.A.,Jha,A.,Cullen,M.,Wallace,L.,Wilensky,R.,et al.(2013).Mindfulness training and reductions in teacher stress and burnout:Results from two randomized,waitlist-control field trials.Journal of Educational Psychology,105(3),787-804.
Sedlmeier,P.,Eberth,J.,Schwarz,M.,Zimmermann,D.,Haarig,F.,Jaeger,S.,et al.(2012).The psychological effects of meditation:A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin,138(6),1139-1171.
Taylor,C.,Harrison,J.,Haimovitz,K.,Oberle,E.,Thomson,K.,Schonert-Reichl,K.,et al.(2015).Examining ways that a mindfulness-based intervention reduces stress in public school teachers:A mixed-methods study.Mindfulness,7(1),115-129.
Tang,Y.Y.,Hölzel,B.K.,& Posner,M.I.(2015).The neuroscience of mindfulness meditation.Nature Reviews Neuroscience,16(5),213-225.
Turpyn,C.C.,& Chaplin,T.M.(2016).Mindful parenting and parents' emotion expression:Effects on adolescent risk behaviors.Mindfulness,7(1),246-254.
Vandenberg,R.J.,& Lance,C.E.(2000).A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature:Suggestions,practices,and recommendations for organizational research.Organizational Research Methods,3(1),4-70.
Widaman,K.F.,& Reise,S.P.(1997).Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments:Applications in the substance use domain.In K.J.Bryant,M.Windle,& S.G.West(Eds.),The science of prevention:Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research(pp.281-324).American Psychological Association.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 通讯作者:周晖,E-mail:edszh@mail.sysu.edu.cn。
更新日期/Last Update:  2020-10-20