我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 SC-IAT范式下中学生良心的内隐性(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2021年01期
页码:
 83-90
栏目:
 
出版日期:
 2021-02-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
 An Implicit Study on Middle School Students’ Conscience under SC-IAT Paradigm
文章编号:
1003-5184(2021)01-0083-08
作者:
 王小凤 燕良轼 丁道群 李 梅 吴喜妹
 (1.湖南师范大学教育科学学院,长沙 410081; 2.中南林业科技大学学生工作部,长沙 410004; 3.北京中公教育科技股份有限公司广东分公司,广州 440106)
Author(s):
 Wang Xiaofeng Yan Liangshi Ding Daoqun Li Mei Wu Ximei
 (1.School of Educational Science,Hunan Normal University,Changsha 410081; 2.The Students Affair Department,Central South University of Forestry and Technology,Changsha 410004; 3.Beijing Zhonggong Education Technology Co.,Ltd.Guangdong Branch,Guangzhou 440106)
关键词:
 中学生;  单类内隐联想测验(SC-IAT);  内隐良心;  外显良心
Keywords:
 middle school students;  Single Category Implicit Association Test(SC-IAT);  implicit conscience;  explicit conscience
分类号:
 B841.2
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 目的:研究探讨了单类内隐联想测验(Single Category Implicit Association Test,SC-IAT)测量中学生良心的可行性,并分析内隐良心和外显良心的关系。方法:采用E-prime3.0软件编制SC-IAT良心测量程序,测量了中学生内隐良心; 采用青少年良心问卷测量了中学生的外显良心,并运用相关技术分析两者之间的关系。结果:SC-IAT实验中,中学生良心的内隐效应显著,且不存在性别、独生与否、学段、家庭结构、家庭所在地等人口统计学指标上的显著差异; 内隐良心与外显良心之间的相关不显著。结论:(1)中学生良心存在积极内隐效应;(2)外显良心和内隐良心相互分离,是两个不同的建构。
Abstract:
 To explore the feasibility of measuring middle school students’ conscience by Single Category Implicit Association Test(SC-IAT)and analyze the relationship between implicit conscience and explicit conscience.Methods:The SC-IAT conscience measurement procedures was developed with software E-prime 3.0,176 middle school students were simultaneously assigned to receive SC-IAT test and explicit conscience measurement by Adolescent Conscience Questionnaire.Results:Implicit effects of middle school students’ conscience measured by SC-IAT was significant(<i>p</i>&lt;0.05),there were no significant differences of the middle school students’ conscience on such demographic indicators as such as gender,only child or not,school period,family structure and family location(<i>p</i>&gt;0.05),and there was no significant correlation between implicit conscience and explicit conscience(<i>p</i>&gt;0.05).Conclusions:(1)Implicit effects of middle school students’ conscience was positive;(2)Implicit conscience is separated from explicit conscience,they belong to two different constructions.

参考文献/References

 戴春林,吴明证,杨治良.(2006).个体攻击性结构与自尊关系研究.心理科学,29(1),44-46.
耿颖.(2011).内隐态度改变的实验研究(硕士学位论文).河北师范大学.
何安明,惠秋平,刘华山.(2013).外显感恩、相对内隐感恩和整体内隐感恩.心理学探新,33(4),81-86.
何安明,刘华山,惠秋平.(2013).大学生感恩内隐效应的实验研究. 心理发展与教育,29(1),23-30.
何安明,惠秋平,刘华山.(2014).SC-IAT范式下大学生感恩的内隐性. 心理学探新,34(6),536-541.
兰文杰,谢芳,何明远,王张君.(2017).大学生人际信任、良心与道德推脱的关系.贵州师范学院学报,33(6),44-52.
李海青,姜瑜,汪凤炎.(2014).情境利害和亲疏关系对大学生良心行为的影响.中国健康心理学杂志,22(5),685-687.
李海青,杨小钧,汪凤炎.(2014).良心的内隐心理反应及其对道德教育的启示.心理研究,7(2),33-39.
李诗晗.(2016).初中生外显、内隐感恩与亲社会倾向的关系研究(硕士学位论文).沈阳师范大学.
李霞,李文虎.(2010).《青少年良心评估问卷》的编制.心理与行为研究,8(4),268-273.
李霞,汤广全,郑洁.(2011).当代大学生良心内隐观的调查研究.河池学院学报,31(5),106-110.
邱小艳,燕良轼.(2016).青少年良心问卷的编制及信效度检验.中国临床心理学杂志,24(2),53-57.
陶琳瑾,胡艳霞,焦林童,闵洋璐,印婕.(2017).老年人宽恕倾向及其与健康的关系研究.老龄科学研究,(8),45-56.
王小凤,燕良轼.(2019).中学生良心与学业成就的关系:学习投入的中介作用.心理学探新,39(1),78-83.
温芳芳,佐斌.(2007).评价单一态度对象的内隐社会认知测验方法.心理科学进展,15(5),828-833.
燕良轼,李亮,卞军凤,徐异.(2018).教育要聚焦于青少年的人性成长.大学教育科学,3(3),12-19.
杨福义.(2006).内隐自尊的理论与实验研究(博士学位论文).华东师范大学.
张帆.(2013).内隐、外显羞耻感与家庭教养方式的关系研究(硕士学位论文).南京师范大学.
张和云,赵欢欢,许燕.(2018).中国人善良人格的结构研究.心理学探新,38(3),30-36.
张云霞,袁彦.(2013).大学生内隐羞耻感的探索.长春教育学院学报,27(12),12-14.
曾练平.(2013).青少年良心的结构、测量及其作用机制的研究(博士学位论文).湖南师范大学.
朱婷婷.(2012).青少年早期宽恕:特质观干预与宽恕干预比较(博士学位论文).南京师范大学.
Banaji,M.R.,Nosek,B.A.,& Greenwald,A.G.(2003).Understanding and using the implicit association test:IV.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,85(2),197-216.
Cohen,J.(1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences(2nd ed.).Hillsdale,NJ:Lawrence Earlbaum.
Dahlqvist,V.,Eriksson,S.,Glasberg,A.-L.,Lindahl,E.,Lu tzen,K.,Strandberg,G.,& Norberg,A.(2007).Development of the perceptions of conscience questionnaire.Nursing Ethics,14(2),181-193.
Greenwald,A.G.,McGhee,D.E.,& Schwartz,J.L.K.(1998).Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition:The Implicit association test.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,74(6),1464-1480.
Greenwald,A.G.,Banaji,M.R.,Rudman,L.A.,Farnham,S.D.,Nosek,B.A.,& Mellott,D.S.(2002).A unified theory of implicit attitudes,stereotypes,self-esteem,and self-concept.Psychological Review,109(1),3-25.
Hoffman,M.L.,& Saltzstein,H.D.(1967).Parent discipine and the child’s moral development.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,5(1),45-57.
Johnson,R.C.,& Kalafat,J.D.(1969).Projective and sociometric measures of conscience development.Child Development,40(2),651-655.
Karpinski,A.,& Hilton,J.L.(2001).Attitudes and the implicit association test.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,81(5),774-788.
Karpinski,A.,& Steinman,R.B.(2006).The Single Category Implicit Association Test as a measure of implicit social cognition.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,91(1),16-32.
Kochanska,G.,& Aksan,N.(1995).Mother-child mutually positive affect,the quality of child compliance to requests and prohibitions,and maternal control as correlates of early internalization.Child Development,66(1),236-254.
Kochanska,G.,Murray,K.,& Coy,K.C.(1997).Inhibitory control as a contributor to conscience in childhood:From toddler to early school age.Child Developmnent,68(2),263-277.
Kochanska,G.,Murray,K.T.,& Harlan,E.T.(2000).Effortful control in early childhood:Continuity and change,antecedents,and implications for social development.Developmental Psychology,36(2),220-232.
Porteus,B.D.,& Johnson,R.C.(1965).Children’s responses to two measures of conscience development and their relation to sociometric nomination.Child Developmnent,36(3),703-711.
Tesser,A.(2000).On the confluence of self-esteem maintenance mechanisms.Personality & Social Psychology Review,4(4),290-299.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目(16YBA383)。
通讯作者:燕良轼,E-mail:yanlshi@163.com。
更新日期/Last Update:  2021-02-20