我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 视觉空间指令条件下SOAs变化对数字-空间联结编码的影响:来自ERP的证据(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2021年06期
页码:
 496-503
栏目:
 
出版日期:
 2021-12-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
 The Effect of SOAs Changes on Number-Space Interactions Coding under Visual Spatial Instruction:Evidence from ERP
文章编号:
1003-5184(2021)06-0496-08
作者:
 张志伟 潘 运
 (贵州师范大学心理学院,贵阳 550025)
Author(s):
 Zhang Zhiwei Pan Yun
 (School of Psychology,Guizhou Normal University,Guiyang 550025)
关键词:
 数字-空间联结;  SNARC效应;  视觉空间指令;  编码;  SOAs
Keywords:
 number-space interaction;  SNARC effect;  visual spatial interaction;  coding;  SOAs
分类号:
 B842.5
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 采用数字奇偶判断任务,以数字1-9(5除外)及汉字标签(左、右)作为实验材料,在视觉空间任务指令下探讨系统改变SOAs对数字-空间联结编码方式的影响。行为结果发现,SNARC效应以视觉空间编码方式为主,SOA为0ms并未出现SNARC效应; ERP结果发现,物理一致性在早期成分N1上的主效应显著。表明任务指导语影响SNARC效应的编码方式,其本质受词语信息标签加工程度的影响,且对SNARC效应的编码出现早期感觉阶段,SOAs与目标数字的特性影响SNARC效应的产生。
Abstract:
 Using parity judgement task,digit 1-9(except 5)and Chinese character label(left and right)as experimental materials,this study explored the influence of system changing SOAs on the coding mode of number-space interaction under the instruction of visual spatial task.The behavioral results showed that the main effect of SNARC was visual spatial coding,and there was no SNARC effect when SOA was 0 ms; ERP results showed that the main effect of physical consistency on the early component N1 was significant.The results show that task guide affects the encoding mode of SNARC effect,which is essentially influenced by the processing degree of word information labels,and the encoding of SNARC effect appears early sensory stage; the characteristics of SOAs and target number affect the generation of SNARC effect.The behavioral results showed that the main effect of SNARC was visual spatial coding,and there was no SNARC effect when SOA was 0 ms; ERP results showed that the main effect of physical consistency on the early component N1 was significant.The results show that task guide affects the encoding mode of SNARC effect,which is essentially influenced by the processing degree of word information labels,and the encoding of SNARC effect appears early sensory stage; the characteristics of SOAs and target number affect the generation of SNARC effect.

参考文献/References

 韩萌,毛新瑞,蔡梦彤,贾茜,郭春彦.(2019).大小判断任务中正负号及其异同对SNARC效应的影响.心理学报,49(8),995-1008.
Calabria,M.,& Rossetti,Y.(2005).Interference between number processing and line bisection:A methodology.Neuropsychologia,43(5),779-783.
Conroy,M.A.,& Polich,J.(2007).Affective valence and P300 when stimulus arousal level is controlled.Cognition and Emotion,21(4),891-901.
Daar,M.,& Pratt,J.(2008).Digits affect actions:The SNARC effect and response selection.Cortex,44(4),400-405.
Dehaene,S.,Bossini,S.,& Giraux,P.(1993).The mental representation of parity and number magnitude.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,122(3),371-396.
Dodd,M.D.(2011).Negative numbers eliminate,but do not reverse,the attentional SNARC effect.Psychological Research,75(1),2-9.
Dodd,M.D.,Van der Stigchel,S.,Adil Leghari,M.,Fung,G.,& Kingstone,A.(2008).Attentional SNARC:There’s something special about numbers(let us count the ways).Cognition,108(3),810-818.
Dormal,V.,Dormal,G.,Joassin,F.,& Pesenti,M.(2012).A common right fronto-parietal network for numerosity and duration processing:An fMRI study.Human Brain Mapping,33(6),1490-1501.
Fischer,M.H.(2003).Cognitive representation of negative numbers.Psychological Science,14(3),278-282.
Fischer,M.H.,& Shaki,S.(2017).Implicit spatial-numerical associations:Negative numbers and the role of counting direction.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance,43(4),639-643.
Fumarola,A.,Prpic,V.,Da Pos,O.,Murgia,M.,Umiltà,C.,& Agostini,T.(2014).Automatic spatial association for luminance.Attention,Perception,and Psychophysics,76(3),759-765.
Georges,C.,Schiltz,C.,& Hoffmann,D.(2015).Task instructions determine the visuospatial and verbal-spatial nature of number-space associations.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,68(9),1895-1909.
Gevers,W.,Ratinckx,E.,De Baene,W.,& Fias,W.(2006).Further evidence that the SNARC effect is processed along a dual-route architectures:Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential.Experimental Psychology,53(1),58-68.
Gevers,W.,Santens,S.,Dhooge,E.,Chen,Q.,Van den Bossche,L.,Fias,W.,& Verguts,T.(2010).Verbal-spatial and visuospatial coding of number-space interactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,139(1),180-190.
Ginsburg,V.,& Gevers,W.(2015).Spatial coding of ordinal information in short-and long-term memory.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,9(JAN),1-10.
Ginsburg,V.,Van Dijck,J.P.,Previtali,P.,Fias,W.,& Gevers,W.(2014).The impact of verbal working memory on number-space associations.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning Memory and Cognition,40(4),976-986.
Gut,M.,Szumska,I.,Wasilewska,M.,& Jas’kowski,P.(2012).Are low and high number magnitudes processed differently while resolving the conflict evoked by the SNARC effect?International Journal of Psychophysiology,85(1),7-16.
Hesse,P.N.,& Bremmer,F.(2017).The SNARC effect in two dimensions:Evidence for a frontoparallel mental number plane.Vision Research,130,85-96.
Hillyard,S.A.,Vogel,E.K.,& Luck,S.J.(1998).Sensory gain control(amplification)as a mechanism of selective attention:Electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B:Biological Sciences,353(1373),1257-1270.
Hoffmann,D.,Goffaux,V.,Schuller,A.M.,& Schiltz,C.(2016).Inhibition of return and attentional facilitation:Numbers can be counted in,letters tell a different story.Acta Psychologica,163,74-80.
Hubbard,E.M.,Piazza,M.,Pinel,P.,& Dehaene,S.(2005).Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex.Nature Reviews Neuroscience,6(6),435-448.
Imbo,I.,Brauwer,J.De.,Fias,W.,& Gevers,W.(2012).The development of the SNARC effect:Evidence for early verbal coding.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,111(4),671-680.
Kadosh,R.C.,Bahrami,B.,Walsh,V.,Butterworth,B.,Popescu,T.,& Price,C.J.(2011).Specialization in the human brain:The case of numbers.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.
Keus,I.M.,Jenks,K.M.,& Schwarz,W.F.(2005).Psychophysiological evidence that the SNARC effect has its functional locus in a response selection stage.Cognitive Brain Research,24(1),48-56.
Luck,S.J.(1998).Research report evidence from human electrophysiology.Pyschological Science,9(3),223-227.
Nikolaev,A.R.,Beck,A.K.,Theobald,S.,Lachmann,T.,& van Leeuwen,C.(2020).Factoring in the spatial effects of symbolic number representation.Biological Psychology,149(July 2019),107782.
Nuerk,H.C.,Wood,G.,& Willmes,K.(2005).The universal SNARC effect:The association between number magnitude and space is amodal.Experimental Psychology,52(3),187-194.
Pashler,H.(1994a).Dual-task interference in simple tasks:Data and theory.Psychological Bulletin,116(2),220-244.
Pashler,H.(1994b).Graded capacity-sharing in dual-task interference?Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance,20(2),330-342.
Pashler,H.,Harris,C.R.,& Nuechterlein,K.H.(2008).Does the central bottleneck encompass voluntary selection of hedonically based choices?Experimental Psychology,55(5),313-321.
Pinto,M.,Fattorini,E.,Lasaponara,S.,D’Onofrio,M.,Fortunato,G.,& Doricchi,F.(2018).Visualising numerals:An ERPs study with the attentional SNARC task.Cortex,101,1-15.
Posner,M.I.,& Cohen,Y.(1984).Components of visual orienting.Attention and Performance,32,531-556.
Proctor,R.W.,& Cho,Y.S.(2006).Polarity correspondence:A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks.Psychological Bulletin,132(3),416-442.
Ren,P.,Nicholls,M.E.R.,Ma,Y.,& Chen,L.(2011).Size matters:Non-numerical magnitude affects the spatial coding of response.PLoS ONE,6(8),4-9.
Salillas,E.,El Yagoubi,R.,& Semenza,C.(2008).Sensory and cognitive processes of shifts of spatial attention induced by numbers:An ERP study.Cortex,44(4),406-413.
Schuller,A.M.,Hoffmann,D.,Goffaux,V.,& Schiltz,C.(2015).Shifts of spatial attention cued by irrelevant numbers:Electrophysiological evidence from a target discrimination task.Journal of Cognitive Psychology,27(4),442-458.
van Dijck,J.P.,Abrahamse,E.L.,Acar,F.,Ketels,B.,& Fias,W.(2014).A working memory account of the interaction between numbers and spatial attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,67(8),1500-1513.
van Dijck,J.P.,& Fias,W.(2011).A working memory account for spatial-numerical associations.Cognition,119(1),114-119.
van Dijck,J.P.,Gevers,W.,Lafosse,C.,& Fias,W.(2012).The heterogeneous nature of number-space interactions.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,5(JANUARY 2012),1-13.
Wang,Q.,Liu,M.,Shi,W.,& Kang,J.(2018).Mechanism of the SNARC effect in numerical magnitude,time sequence,and spatial sequence tasks:Involvement of LTM and WM.Frontiers in Psychology,9(AUG),1-12.
Weis,T.,Estner,B.,& Lachmann,T.(2016).When speech enhances Spatial Musical Association of Response Codes:Joint spatial associations of pitch and timbre in nonmusicians.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,69(9),1687-1700.
Weis,T.,Estner,B.,van Leeuwen,C.,& Lachmann,T.(2016).SNARC(spatial-numerical association of response codes)meets SPARC(spatial-pitch association of response codes):Automaticity and interdependency in compatibility effects.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,69(7),1366-1383.
Zorzi,M.,Priftis,K.,& Umiltà,C.(2002).Brain damage:Neglect disrupts the mental number line.Nature,417(6885),138-139.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(31860281),贵州省科技计划项目(黔科合平台人才[2018]5769号)。
更新日期/Last Update:  1900-01-01