我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 权力感对道德判断的影响及其理论解释:基于CNI模型的视角(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2021年06期
页码:
 540-546
栏目:
 
出版日期:
 2021-12-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
 The Influence of the Sense of Power on Moral Judgment and Its Theoretical Explanation:Based on the Perspective of the CNI Model
文章编号:
1003-5184(2021)06-0540-07
作者:
 袁方舟1; 2; 叶 琴1; 牟芳艳1; 七十三2
 (1.贵州师范大学心理学院,贵阳 550025; 2.内蒙古师范大学心理学院,呼和浩特 010022)
Author(s):
 Yuan Fangzhou1; 2; Ye Qin1; Mu Fangyan1; Qi Shisan2
 (1.School of Psychology,Guizhou Normal University,Guiyang 550025; 2.School of Psychology,Inner Mongolia Normal University,Hohhot 010022)
关键词:
 权力感;  道德判断;  CNI模型;  传统两难困境范式
Keywords:
 sense of power;  moral judgment;  CNI model;  traditional dilemma paradigm
分类号:
 B848
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 权力感指个体对控制他人和自身的能力的感知。现有权力对道德判断的影响研究主要使用传统两难困境范式,围绕权力感影响主体道德判断的功利论倾向与道义论倾向展开,且研究观点尚未达成共识。由于传统两难困境范式的局限性,研究者开发了道德判断CNI模型探究权力感对道德判断的影响,该模型为两者之间的关系提供了新的解释路径。未来研究可关注CNI模型视角下不同类型权力感对道德判断的影响以及探讨特质性权力感与情境性权力感对个体道德判断差异的联合作用。
Abstract:
 The sense of power refers to an individual’s perception of their ability to control others and themselves.The existing research on the influence of power on moral judgment mainly uses the traditional dilemma paradigm,focusing on the utilitarian tendency and deontological tendency of the subject’s moral judgment affected by the sense of power,and the research views have not reached a consensus.Due to the limitations of the traditional dilemma paradigm,the researchers developed the moral judgment CNI model to explore the impact of the sense of power on moral judgment,and this model provides a new way to explain the relationship between the two variables.Future research should focus on the influence of different types of power on moral judgment from the perspective of CNI model and explore the combined effect of idiosyncratic power and situational power on individual moral judgment differences.

参考文献/References

 贾双跃.(2019).中国现代化进程中的社会分化现象研究(博士学位论文).中共中央党校,北京.
刘传军,廖江群.(2021).道德困境研究的范式沿革及其理论价值.心理科学进展,29(8),1508-1520.
黎晓丹,丁道群,叶浩生.(2019).身体姿势启动的内隐权力感对公平决策的影响.心理学报,51(1),106-116.
李小平,杨晟宇,李梦遥.(2012).权威人格与权力感对道德思维方式的影响.心理学报,44(7),964-971.
韦庆旺,俞国良.(2009).权力的社会认知研究述评.心理科学进展,17(6),1336-1343.
王挺,肖三蓉,徐光兴.(2011).人格特质,家庭环境对中学生道德判断能力的影响.心理科学,34(3),664-669.
吴言动,喻丰,彭凯平,刘书青.(2019).心真的会"软"吗?软硬感受与语义改变道德判断.心理学探新,39(6),571-574.
徐科朋,杨凌倩,吴家虹,薛宏,张姝玥.(2020).CNI 模型在道德决策研究中的应用.心理科学进展,28(12),2102-2113.
叶红燕,张凤华.(2015).从具身视角看道德判断.心理科学进展,23(8),1480-1488.
云祥.(2020).权力感对道德困境判断的影响:基于 CNI 模型的分析.心理与行为研究,18(4),544-551.
郑睦凡,赵俊华.(2013).权力如何影响道德判断行为:情境卷入的效应.心理学报,45(11),1274-1282.
翟学伟.(2015).人情、面子与权力的再生产(修订版).北京:北京大学出版社.
曾笑雨,马燚娜.(2020).多项式模型在道德判断研究中的应用.科学通报,65(19),1912-1921.
Aguilar,P.,Brussino,S.,& Fernández-Dols,J.M.(2013).Psychological distance increases uncompromising consequentialism.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,49(3),449-452.
Carney,D.R.,& Mason,M.F.(2010).Decision making and testosterone:When the ends justify the means.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,46(4),668-671.
Caza,B.B.,Tiedens,L.,& Lee,F.(2011).Power becomes you:The effects of implicit and explicit power on the self.Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes,114(1),15-24.
Chen,Serena,Lee-Chai,Annette,Y.,...Bargh,A.(2001).Relationship Orientation as a Moderator of the Effects of Social Power.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,80(2),173-187.
Conway,P.,& Gawronski,B.(2013).Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making:a process dissociation approach.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,104(2),216-235.
C?té,S.,Piff,P.K.,& Willer,R.(2013).For whom do the ends justify the means?Social class and utilitarian moral judgment.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,104(3),490-503.
Fleischmann,A.,Lammers,J.,Conway,P.,& Galinsky,A.D.(2017).Paradoxical effects of power on moral thinking:Why power both increases and decreases deontological and utilitarian moral decisions.Social Psychological and Personality Science,10(1),110-120.
Galinsky,A.D.,Gruenfeld,D.H.,& Magee,J.C.(2003).From power to action.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,85(3),453-466.
Galinsky,A.D.,Magee,J.C.,Inesi,M.E.,& Gruenfeld,D.H.(2006).Power and perspectives not taken.Psychological Science,17,1068-1074.
Gawronski,B.,Armstrong,J.,Conway,P.,Friesdorf,R.,& Huetter,M.(2017).Consequences,norms,and generalized inaction in moral dilemmas:The CNI model of moral decision-making.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,113(3),343-376.
Gawronski,B.,& Brannon,S.M.(2020).Power and moral dilemma judgments:Distinct effects of memory recall versus social roles.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,86(103908).
Greene,J.D.,Morelli,S.A.,Lowenberg,K.,Nystrom,L.E.,& Cohen,J.D.(2008).Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment.Cognition,107(3),1144-1154.
Greene,J.D.,Sommerville,R.B.,Nystrom,L.E.,Darley,J.M.,& Cohen,J.D.(2001).An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment.Science,293(5537),2105-2108.
Josephs,R.A.,Sellers,J.G.,Newman,M.L.,& Mehta,P.H.(2006).The mismatch effect:When testosterone and status are at odds.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,90(6),999-1013.
Kahane,G.,Everett,J.,Earp,B.D.,Farias,M.,& Savulescu,J.(2015).’utilitarian’ judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas do not reflect impartial concern for the greater good.Cognition,134(11),193-209.
Keltner,D.,Gruenfeld,D.H.,& Anderson,C.(2003).Power,approach,and inhibition.Psychological Review,110(2),265-284.
Kim,J.,Shin,Y.,& Lee,S.(2017).Built on stone or sand:The stable powerful are unethical,the unstable powerful are not.Journal of Business Ethics,144(2),437-447.
Kristof,A.L.(2010).Person-organization fit:An integrative review of its conceptualizations,measurement,and implications.Personnel Psychology,49(1),1-49.
Lammers,J.,& Stapel,D.A.(2009).How power influences moral thinking.J Pers Soc Psychol,97(2),279-289.
Lammers,J.,Stoker,J.I.,& Stapel,D.A.(2009).Differentiating social and personal power:Opposite effects on stereotyping,but parallel effects on behavioral approach tendencies.Psychological Science,20(12),1543-1548.
Lucas,B.J.,& Galinsky,A.D.(2015).Is Utilitarianism Risky?How the Same Antecedents and Mechanism Produce Both Utilitarian and Risky Choices.Perspectives on Psychological Science A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science,10(4),541-548.
Magee,J.C.,Milliken,F.J.,& Lurie,A.R.(2010).Power differences in the construal of a crisis:The immediate aftermath of september 11,2001.Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin,36(3),354-370.
Magee,J.C.,& Smith,P.K.(2013).Personality and social psychology review the social distance theory of power.Personality & Social Psychology Review,17(2),158-186.
Overbeck,J.R.,& Park,B.(2001).When power does not corrupt:Superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,81(4),549-565.
Rucker,D.D.,Galinsky,A.D.,& Dubois,D.(2012).Power and consumer behavior:How power shapes who and what consumers value.Journal of Consumer Psychology,22(3),352-368.
Rucker,D.D.,Hu,M.,& Galinsky,A.D.(2014).The experience versus the expectations of power:A recipe for altering the effects of power on behavior.Journal of Consumer Research,(2),381-396.
Smith,P.K.,& Hofmann,W.(2016).Power in everyday life.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,10043-10048.
Stel,M., Dijk, E. V., Smith, P. K., Dijk, W. V., & Djalal, F. M.(2011). Lowering the pitch of your voice makes you feel more powerful and think more abstractly.Social Psychological and Personality Science,3(4), 497-502.
Suessenbach,F.,& Moore,A.B.(2015).Individual differences in the explicit power motive predict “utilitarian” choices in moral dilemmas,especially when this choice is self-beneficial.Personality & Individual Differences,86,297-302.
Torelli,C.J.,& Shavitt,S.(2011).The impact of power on information processing depends on cultural orientation.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,47(5),959-967.
Tost,& Plunkett,L.(2015).When,why,and how do powerholders “feel the power”?Examining the links between structural and psychological power and reviving the connection between power and responsibility.Research in Organizational Behavior,35,29-56.
Tost,L.P.,Johnson,H.H.J.O.B.,& Processes,H.D.(2019).The prosocial side of power:How structural power over subordinates can promote social responsibility.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,152,25-46.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基于CNI模型的视角基金项目:贵州省2020年度哲学社会科学规划一般课题(20GZYB58)。
通讯作者:七十三,E-mail:qshisan@126.com。
更新日期/Last Update:  1900-01-01