我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 样例呈现方式对概念训练类别表征的影响(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2022年01期
页码:
 28-35
栏目:
 
出版日期:
 2022-02-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
 The Influence of Item-Presenting Mode to Concept Training in Category Representation
文章编号:
1003-5184(2022)01-0028-08
作者:
 黄柳恒1; 陆哲毅1; 邢 强1; 刘便荣2
 (1.广州大学心理学系,广州 510006; 2.广西工商职业技术学院,南宁 530008)
Author(s):
 Huang Liuheng1; Lu Zheyi1; Xing Qiang1; Liu Bianrong2
 (1.Department of Psychology,Guangzhou University,Guangzhou 510006; 2.Mental Health Education Center,Guangxi Vocational College of Technology and Busines,Nanning 530008)
关键词:
 类别学习;  类别表征;  比较优势;  呈现方式
Keywords:
 category learning;  category representation;  comparison advantage;  item-presenting mode
分类号:
 B842.5
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 以往研究发现训练形式会影响类别学习的表征方式。实验采用学习-迁移范式,探究概念训练中样例的呈现方式对类别表征的影响。实验中被试通过不同呈现方式来学习类别知识,在学习3个block之后对其进行测验。实验结果表明:(1)学习单样例和同一类别比较学习的被试在测验阶段的成绩与学习阶段之间没有差异;(2)学习不同类别比较学习的被试在测验阶段的成绩大幅度下降。因此得出结论,在概念训练中,不同类别比较学习导致被试形成类别间信息的表征。
Abstract:
 Previous studies have found that training methodology will affect the representation of category learning.This experiment adopts the learning-transfer paradigm to study the influence of the presentation of the sample on the category representation in the concept training.The participants study category knowledge through learning different item-presenting mode in the experiment.After studying 3 blocks,they will accept the test.Experimental results show:(1)there is no difference between the result of test phase and the learning phase of the participants who study single item and the participants who study comparison learning of same-category item-pairs.(2)The test results of the participants who studied comparison learning of different-category item-pairs declined significantly in the test phase.Therefore,it is concluded that in conceptual training,comparison learning of different-category item-pairs will lead to the formation of between-category representation to the participants.

参考文献/References

 丁小斌,阴国恩.(2009).COVIS神经生物学基础.现代生物医学进展,9(3),536-539,524.
刘万伦.(2007).类别学习多重系统理论研究述评.辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版),(2),52-55.
刘志雅,莫雷.(2009).两种学习模式下类别学习的结果:原型和样例.心理学报,41(1),44-52.
邢强,夏静静,王彩燕.(2016).工作记忆容量与内容相关性对类别学习的影响.心理发展与教育,32(3),324-329.
Ashby,F.G.,& Ell,S.W.(2001).The neurobiology of human category learning.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,5(5),204-210.
Carvalho,P.F.,& Goldstone,R.L.(2014).Effects of interleaved and blocked study on delayed test of category learning generalization.Frontiers in Psychology,5.
Corral,D.,Kurtz,K.J.,& Jones,M.(2018).Learning relational concepts from within-versus between-category comparisons.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,147(11),1571-1596.
Ell,S.W.,Smith,D.B.,Peralta,G.,& Helie,S.(2017).The impact of category structure and training methodology on learning and generalizing within-category representations.Attention,Perception,& Psychophysics,79(6),1777-1794.
Gentner,D.(1983).Structure-mapping:A theoretical framework for analogy.Cognitive Science,7(2),155-170.
Helie,S.,Shamloo,F.,& Ell,S.W.(2017).The effect of training methodology on knowledge representation in categorization.PLoS One,12(8),e0183904.
Higgins,E.,& Ross,B.(2011).Comparisons in category learning:How best to compare for what.Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society,33,1388-1393.
Kurtz,K.J.,Boukrina,O.,& Gentner,D.(2013).Comparison promotes learning and transfer of relational categories.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,39(4),1303-1310.
Kurtz,K.J.,& Gentner,D.(1998).Category learning and comparison in the evolution of similarity structure.Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference of Cognitive Science Society,1236.
Levering,K.R.,& Kurtz,K.J.(2015).Observation versus classification in supervised category learning.Memory & Cognition,43(2),266-282.
Markman,A.B.,& Ross,B.H.(2003).Category use and category learning.Psychological Bulletin,129(4),592-613.
Patterson,J.D.,& Kurtz,K.J.(2019).Comparison-based learning of relational categories(you’ll never guess).Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition,46(5),851-871.
Peirce,J.W.(2007).PsychoPy-psychophysics software in python.Journal of Neuroscience Methods,162(1-2),8-13.
Peirce,J.W.(2009).Generating stimuli for neuroscience using PsychoPy.Frontiers in Neuroinformatics,2,10.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:广州市哲学社会科学发展“十三五”规划项目(2020GZYB91),2018年度广西中青年教师基础能力提升项目(2018KY1137)。
通讯作者:邢强,E-mail:qiang_xingpsy@126.com。
更新日期/Last Update:  1900-01-01