我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 样例多样性和流畅性信念对类别学习判断的影响(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2022年06期
页码:
 499-507
栏目:
 认知心理学
出版日期:
 2022-12-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
 The Impact of Exemplar Variability and Fluency Belief on Category Learning Judgment
文章编号:
1003-5184(2022)06-0499-09
作者:
 余玉荣1; 3; 刘便荣2; 邢 强3
 (1.广州幼儿师范高等专科学校,广州 511300; 2.广西工商职业技术学院,南宁 530008; 3.广州大学心理学系,广州 510006)
Author(s):
 Yu Yurong1; 3; Liu Bianrong2; Xing Qiang3
 (1.Guangzhou Preschool Teachers College,Guangzhou 511300; 2.Guangxi Vocational College of Technology and Business,Nanning 530008; 3.Department of Psychology,Guangzhou University,Guangzhou 510006)
关键词:
 类别学习判断;  信念;  重复性;  多样性;  流畅性
Keywords:
 category learning judgement;  belief;  repetition;  variability;  fluency
分类号:
 B842.5
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 目的:通过三个实验考查样例特征、流畅性和信念对类别学习及其元认知判断的影响。方法:实验1采用2(样例特征)×2(测试类型)的组内设计以检验样例特征的作用; 实验2采用2(样例特征)×2(测试类型)×2(流畅性)的组内设计以检验流畅性的作用; 实验3采用2(样例特征)×2(测试类型)×2(流畅性信念)的混合设计以检验信念对类别学习判断的作用。结果表明:样例特征影响学习成绩、类别学习判断和流畅感; 流畅性不会影响类别学习判断; 原理解释能够有效建立“关于流畅性的信念”,且“关于流畅性的信念”对类别学习判断起作用。即样例多样性和流畅性信念对类别学习判断起作用,支持信念假说。
Abstract:
 The effects of sample characteristics,fluency and beliefs on category learning and metacognitive judgments were examined through three experiments,.Experiment 1 uses a 2(sample feature)× 2(test type)in-group design to test the effect of sample features; In experiment 2,a 2(sample feature)× 2(test type)× 2(fluency)in-group design is used to test the effect of fluency; Experiment 3 uses a mixed design of 2(sample characteristics)× 2(test type)× 2(fluency belief)to test the effect of belief on category learning judgment.The results showed that the sample characteristics affected learning performance,category learning judgment and fluency.Fluency does not affect category learning judgment; Principle explanations can effectively establish “beliefs about fluency”,and “beliefs about fluency” play a role in category learning judgments.That is,sample diversity and fluency beliefs play a role in category learning judgments and support the belief hypothesis.

参考文献/References

 陈颖,李锋盈,李伟健.(2019).个体关于加工流畅性的信念对字体大小效应的影响.心理学报,51(2),154-162.
邢强,莫雷.(2006).样例的编码方式对问题解决迁移的影响及心理机制.心理发展与教育,22(2),71-75.
Besken,M.,& Mulligan,N.W.(2014).Perceptual fluency,auditory generation,and metamemory:Analyzing the perceptual fluency hypothesis in the auditory modality.Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory & Cognition,40(2),429-440.
Carpenter,S.K.,Wilford,M.M.,Kornell,N.,& Mullaney,K.M.(2013).Appearances can be deceiving:Instructor fluency increases perceptions of learning without increasing actual learning.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,20(6),1350-1356.
Doyle,M.E.,& Hourihan,K.L.(2016).Metacognitive monitoring during category learning:How success affects future behaviour.Memory,24(9),1197-1207.
Dunlosky,J.,& Hertzog,C.(2000).Updating knowledge about encoding strategies:A componential analysis of learning about strategy effectiveness from task experience.Psychology & Aging,15(3),462-474.
Hartwig,M.K.,& Dunlosky,J.(2017).Category learning judgments in the classroom:Can students judge how well they know course topics?Contemporary Educational Psychology,49,80-90.
Jacoby,L.L.,Wahlheim,C.N.,& Coane,J.H.(2010).Test-enhanced learning of natural concepts:Effects on recognition memory,classification,and metacognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,36(6),1441-1451.
Kang,S.H.K.,& Pashler,H.(2012).Learning painting styles:Spacing is advantageous when it promotes discriminative contrast.Applied Cognitive Psychology,26(1),97-103.
Kelley,C.M.,& Jacoby,L.L.(1996).Adult egocentrism:Subjective experience versus analytic bases for judgment.Journal of Memory & Language,35(2),157-175.
Kornell,N.,& Bjork,R.A.(2008).Optimising self-regulated study:The benefits-and costs-of dropping flashcards.Memory,16(2),125-136.
Kornell,N.,& Bjork,R.A.(2010).Learning concepts and categories:Is spacing the “enemy of induction”?Psychological Science,19(6),585-592.
Koriat,A.(1997).Monitoring one's own knowledge during study:A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology General,126(4),349-370.
Koriat,A.,& Bjork,R.A.(2006).Mending metacognitiveillusions:A comparison of mnemonic-based and theory-based procedures.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,32(5),1133-1145.
Mueller,M.L.,& Dunlosky,J.(2017).How beliefs can impact judgments of learning:Evaluating analytic processing theory with beliefs about fluency.Journal of Memory & Language,93,245-258.
Mueller,M.L.,Dunlosky,J.,Tauber,S.K.,& Rhodes,M.G.(2014).The font-size effect on judgments of learning:Does it exemplify fluency effects or reflect people's beliefs about memory?Journal of Memory and Language,70,1-12.
Tauber,S.K.,& Dunlosky,J.(2015).Monitoring of learning at the category level when learning a natural concept:Will task experience improve its resolution?Acta Psychologica,155,8-18.
Undorf,M.,& Erdfelder,E.(2015).The relatedness effect on judgments of learning:A closer look at the contribution of processing fluency.Memory & Cognition,43(4),647-658.
Wahlheim,C.N.,Finn,B.,& Jacoby,L.L.(2012).Metacognitive judgments of repetition and variability effects in natural concept learning:Evidence for variability neglect.Memory & Cognition,40(5),703-716.
Wahlheim,C.N.,& Desoto,K.A.(2016).Study preferences for exemplar variability in self-regulated category learning.Memory,25(2),1-13.
Yan,V.X.,Bjork,E.L.,& Bjork,R.A.(2016).On the difficulty of mending metacognitive illusions:A priori theories,fluency effects,and misattributions of the interleaving benefit.Journal of Experimental Psychology General,145(7),918-933.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:全国教育科学规划“十三五”教育学一般项目(BBA200033),2018年度广西中青年教师基础能力提升项目(2018KY1137),广东省普通高校创新人才项目(2022WQNCX310)。
通讯作者:邢强,E-mail:qiang_xingpsy@126.com。
更新日期/Last Update:  2022-12-20