我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 有时间压力下学习率对学习时间分配议程的影响:来自眼动的证据(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2022年06期
页码:
 508-513
栏目:
 认知心理学
出版日期:
 2022-12-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Effect of the Rate of Learning on Study Time Allocation Agenda When under Time Pressure:Evidence from Eye Movements
文章编号:
1003-5184(2022)06-0508-06
作者:
 贾 宁1; 刘 伟1; 代景华2
 (1.河北师范大学教育学院,石家庄 050024; 2.河北中医学院,石家庄 050200)
Author(s):
 Jia Ning1; Liu Wei1; Dai Jinghua2
 (1.College of Education,Hebei Normal University,Shijiazhuang 050024; 2.Hebei University of Chinese Medicine,Shijiazhuang 050200)
关键词:
 学习率;  项目选择;  学习时间分配;  议程;  眼动
Keywords:
 rate of learning;  item selection;  study time allocation;  agenda;  eye movements
分类号:
 B842.5
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 利用眼动分析技术,通过设置不同难度和分值的计算项目,探讨了在有时间压力下学习者的学习时间分配。结果发现:(1)在首次项目选择上,学习者优先选择学习率最高的项目;(2)在学习过程中,学习者的项目选择次序也是根据学习率由高到低。总之,在学习时间分配上,如果需要权衡难度与分值,学习者会考虑单位时间的获益,也就是以学习率为议程的主要依据。研究不仅利用眼动分析技术证实了基于议程的学习时间分配模型,而且进一步揭示了学习率是设置学习时间分配议程的重要依据。
Abstract:
 Utilizing eye movement analysis technology,this study looked into the allocation of study time for learners when under time pressure,with varying difficulty and items for score calculation.The findings indicated that the participants initially favoured the item with the highest Rate of Learning(ROL),and furthermore,when engaging in the learning process,they chose their projects in a descending order of ROL.Evidence has been found that the agenda for allocating study time should be determined by ROL,which takes into account the difficulty and score.Eye movement analysis has verified that the agenda-based allocation of study time model is effective,and that the ROL is a major component of the agenda.

参考文献/References

 贾宁,刘伟,代景华.(2020).学习率的心理现实性及其对项目选择的影响.心理与行为研究,18(2),255-261.
贾宁,白学军,臧传丽,阎国利.(2008).学习时间分配机制的眼动研究.心理科学,31(1),93-96.
姜英杰,王志伟,郑明玲,金雪莲.(2016).基于价值的议程对学习时间分配影响的眼动研究.心理学报,48(10),1229-1238.
李伟健,蔡任娜,陈海德,汪磊,王敏敏.(2013).不同呈现方式下项目难度与分值对自定步调学习时间的影响.心理科学,(6),1363-1368.
李伟健,家晓余,陈海德,黄杰,蔡任娜,曹玮,等.(2013).自定步调学习时间的习惯性反应:来自眼动的证据.心理科学,36(5),1043-1047.
李伟健,谢瑞波,陈海德,黄杰.(2014).议程与习惯性反应对学习时间分配的影响:来自眼动的证据.心理发展与教育,30(3),277-283.
任洁,李伟健,谢瑞波,李平,陈海德.(2014).项目分值对学习时间分配的影响:一种动态的过程.心理科学,37(4),907-911.
王志伟,姜英杰.(2019).难度-价值权衡情境下的项目选择及其眼动特征.心理科学,42(4),854-860.
魏子晗,李兴珊.(2015).决策过程的追踪:基于眼动的证据.心理科学进展,23(12),2029-2041.
谢瑞波,黄杰,陈海德,李伟健.(2014).不同学习目标下词对位置对学习时间分配的影响.心理科学,37(5),1185-1189.
谢瑞波,路璐,李伟健.(2016).学习时间分配的基于议程调节模型.心理与行为研究,14(2),283-288.
岳阳,姜英杰,马林,王志伟,于洋.(2018).眼动追踪在价值导向元记忆研究中的应用.心理科学,41(4),816-821.
Ariel,R.,Dunlosky,J.,& Bailey,H.(2009).Agenda-based regulation of study-time allocation:When agendas override item-based monitoring.Journal of Experimental Psychology General,138(3),432-447.
Dunlosky,J.,& Ariel,R.(2011).The influence of agenda-based and habitual processes on item selection during study.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning Memory and Cognition,37(4),899-912.
Jia,X.,Li,W.,Cao,L.,Li,P.,Shi,M.,Wang,J.,...Li,X.(2018).Effect of individual thinking styles on item selection during study time allocation.International Journal of Psychology,53(2),83-91.
Jiang,Y.,Wang,Z.,Zheng,M.,& Jin,X.(2016).How value-based agendas affect study time allocation:An eye tracking study.Acta Psychologica Sinica,48(10),1229-1238.
Metcalfe,J.(2002).Is study time allocated selectively to a region of proximal learning?Journal of Experimental Psychology General,131(3),349-363.
Metcalfe,J.,& Kornell,N.(2003).The dynamics of learning and allocation of study time to a region of proximal learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,132(4),530-542.
Metcalfe,J.,& Kornell,N.(2005).A region of proximal learning model of study time allocation.Journal of Memory & Language,52(4),463-477.
Wang,F.,Qin,Q.,& Jiang,Y.(2016).Allocation of study time in Chinese junior school students:Habitual responding,item difficulty,andtime constraints.Frontiers In Psychology,7,639.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:河北省高等学校人文社会科学研究重大攻关项目(ZD202109)。
通讯作者:代景华,E-mail:daijinghuapsy@163.com。
更新日期/Last Update:  2022-12-20