我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 高难度材料的元记忆监测更受记忆广度的制约(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2018年02期
页码:
 123-129
栏目:
 认知心理学
出版日期:
 2018-03-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Metamemory Monitoring for Difficult Materials is More Seriously Constrained by Span of Short-term Memory
文章编号:
1003-5184(2018)02-0123-07
作者:
 王协顺 苏彦捷
 北京大学心理与认知科学学院,行为与心理健康北京市重点实验室,北京 100871
Author(s):
 Wang Xieshun Su Yanjie
 School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences and Beijing Key laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health,Peking University,Beijing 100871
关键词:
 短时记忆广度;  一般自我效能感;  材料难度;  元记忆监测
Keywords:
 Key words:span of short-term memory;  general self-efficacy;  difficulty of material;  metamemory monitoring
分类号:
 B842.5
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 以不同难度(有、无意义联系)的两种中文词对为记忆材料,随机选取在校大学生200名,采用经典的回忆-判断-再认(recall-judgement-recognition,RJR)范式,考察短时记忆广度和一般自我效能感对个体在不同难度材料上元记忆监测的影响。结果发现,相比于无意义联系的材料,个体在有意义联系的材料上,JOL、FOK和JOC判断等级更高,线索回忆测验成绩更好。但是,个体在不同材料上的JOL判断和线索回忆受短时记忆广度的调节。不同短时记忆广度的个体在有意义联系材料上的JOL判断等级和线索回忆测验成绩无显著差异,但是在无意义联系材料上,高短时记忆广度个体的JOL判断等级和线索回忆测验成绩均显著高于低短时记忆广度个体。同时,相关分析结果也发现,相比于低短时记忆广度的个体,高短时记忆广度的个体,其线索回忆测验成绩和再认测验成绩与JOL、FOK和JOC判断等级之间更加相关。实验结果表明,作为一种人格变量,一般自我效能感对个体元记忆监测的影响可能并不明显。而短时记忆广度,很大程度上反映了个体的记忆能力,是个体元记忆监测的一个重要影响因素,尤其是对难度较大的材料。
Abstract:
 Abstract:Four groups of undergraduates identified by Span of Short-term Memory(STM)and General Self-Efficacy(GSE)were recruited to examine their metamemory monitoring of materials varying in level of difficulty.The materials were semantically related or unrelated pairs of Chinese word.The results showed the ratings of JOL,FOK and JOC and the accuracy of recall for related pairs were higher than those for unrelated pairs.However,the span of STM had a significant interaction with the level of difficulty.Specifically,the ratings of JOL and the accuracy of recall for unrelated pairs were higher in subjects with larger span of STM than those in subjects with smaller span of STM,yet differences for related pairs were insignificant.Furthermore,correlation analyses found that subjects with larger span of STM showed significant correlations between accuracy of recalling and recognizing and the ratings of JOL,FOK and JOC in more conditions than subjects with smaller span of STM.Overall,the study did not find that the GSE,as a personality variable,might affect one's metamemory monitoring.However,the span of STM,reflecting one's capacity of memory,played an important role in one's metamemory monitoring,especially for materials more difficult to memorize.

参考文献/References

 陈芳艳,李锋盈,李伟健.(2016).知觉线索对元记忆监控的影响.心理科学进展,24(4),494-500. 陈功香.(2014).知觉流畅性对学习判断及准确性的影响.鲁东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),31,90-94. 段再复.(2011).数字短时记忆广度、词语类型对关联性错误记忆的影响.沈阳师范大学学报(社会科学版),35(6),164-166. 郭春涛,胡竹箐.(2009).FOK产生机制的实验研究.心理科学,32(1),144-147. 韩凯,施晓斌,郝学芹.(1997).FOK产生机制的实验研究.心理科学,20(6),485-490. 贺莉,高凤兰.(2010).高校俄语学习者自我效能感与俄语学习策略的相关研究.东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版),(1),168-174. 姜英杰,严燕.(2013).4～6岁儿童元记忆监测判断的发展.心理科学,36(2),406-410. 刘爱伦,孙延超.(2004).线索熟悉性与易接近性对FOK影响的实验研究.心理科学,27(2),261-263. 陆昌勤,凌文辁,方俐洛.(2004).管理自我效能感与一般自我效能感的关系.心理学报,36(5),586-592. 王晓均,孙昌识.(1998).汉字材料的性质对视觉短时记忆广度影响的实验研究.心理科学,21,146-192. 王勋,姜珊,高艳芳,张振新.(2015).情绪影响元记忆监测的研究范式及其机制.心理研究,8(1),8-14. 吴卫国,苏彦捷.(2008).6～12岁小学生数字记忆广度的发展.宁波大学学报(教育科学版),30(4),62-67. 张萌,张积家,张全信.(2000).呈现方式、自我效能感和成就动机对FOK的影响.心理学报,32(4),357-392. 张旭锦.(2010).知觉流畅性对判断和决策的影响.心理科学进展,18(4),639-645. 张振新,徐宪斌.(2012).情绪状态对学习判断的影响及其机制.心理科学,35(1),153-159. 周楚,刘晓明,张明.(2004).学习困难儿童元记忆监测和控制特点.心理学报,36(1),65-70. Ariel,R.,Al-Harthy,I.S.,Was,C.A.,& Dunlosky,J.(2011).Habitual reading biases in the allocation of study time.Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,18(5),1015-1021. Bandura,A.(1997).Self-efficacy:The exercise of control.New York:W.H.Freeman. Bjork,R.A.,Dunlosky,J.,& Kornell,N.(2013).Self-regulated learning:Beliefs,techniques,and illusions.Annual Review of Psychology,64,417-444. Busey,T.A.,Tunnicliff,J.,Loftus,G.R.,& Loftus,E.F.(2000).Accounts of the confidence-accuracy relation in recognition memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7(1),26-48. Castel,A.D.,McCabe,D.P.,& Roediger,H.L.(2007).Illusions of competence and overestimation of associative memory for identical items:Evidence from judgments of learning.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,14(1),107-111. Chua,E.F.,& Bliss-Moreau,E.(2016).Knowing your heart and your mind:The relationships between metamemory and interoception.Consciousness & Cognition,45,146-158. Chen,G.,Gully,S.M.,Whiteman,J.,& Kilcullen,R.N.(2000).Examination of relationships among trait-like individual differences,state-like individual differences,and learning performance.Journal of Applied Psychology,85(6),835-847. Dunlosky,J.,& Ariel,R.(2011).Self-regulated learning and the allocation of study time.Psychology of Learning and Motivation,54,103-140. Fiacconi,C.M.,Kouptsova,J.E.,& Köhler,S.(2017).A role for visceral feedback and interoception in feelings-of knowing.Consciousness & Cognition,53,70-80. Foster,N.L.,& Sahakyan,L.(2012).Metacognition influences item-method directed forgetting.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,38(5),1309-1324. Judge,T.A.,& Bono,J.E.(2001).Relationship of core self-evaluations traits-self-esteem,generalized self-efficacy,locus of control,and emotional stability-with job satisfaction and job performance:A meta-analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology,86(1),80-92. Li,F.Y.,Xie,R.B.,Li,X.Y.,& Li,W.J.(2015).The influence of perceptual information on control processes involved in self-regulated learning:Evidence from item selection.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,22(4),1007-1013. Metcalfe,J.,& Kornell,N.(2005).A region of proximal learning model of study time allocation.Journal of Memory and Language,52(4),463-477. Miele,D.B.,& Molden,D.C.(2010).Naive theories of intelligence and the role of processing fluency in perceived comprehension.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,139(3),535-557. Nelson,T.O.,& Narens,L.(1994).Why investigate metacognition?In J.Metcalfe & A.P.Shimamura(Eds.),Metacognition:Knowing about knowing(pp.1-25).Cambridge,MA:MIT Press. Rhodes,M.G.,& Castel,A.D.(2008).Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information:Evidence for metacognitive illusions.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,137(4),615-625. Rhodes,M.G.,& Castel,A.D.(2009).Metacognitive illusions for auditory information:Effects on monitoring and control.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,16(3),550-554. Woodruff,S.L.,& Cashman,J.F.(1993).Task,domain,and general efficacy:A reexamination of the self-efficacy scale.Psychological Reports,72(2),423-432. Yue,C.L.,Castel,A.D.,& Bjork,R.A.(2013).When disfluency is-and is not-a desirable difficulty:The influence of typeface clarity on metacognitive judgments and memory.Memory & Cognition,41(2),229-241. Zhang,J.X.,& Schwarzer,R.(1995).Measuring optimistic self-beliefs:A Chinese adaptation of the General Self-efficacy Scale.Psychologia,38(3),174-181.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(31571134,31371040)。 通讯作者:苏彦捷,E-mail:yjsu@pku.edu.cn。
更新日期/Last Update:  2018-03-15