我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 分析性认知风格对偏差反应与冲突探查的影响(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2019年06期
页码:
 521-526
栏目:
 推理心理学
出版日期:
 2019-12-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
 The Influence of Analytical Cognitive Style on Bias Response and Conflict Detection in Reasoning
文章编号:
1003-5184(2019)06-0521-06
作者:
 艾 炎1; 2; 胡竹菁2
 (1.江西师范大学心理学院,南昌 330022; 2.江西财经大学人文学院,南昌 330013)
Author(s):
 Ai Yan1; 2; Hu Zhujing2
 (1.School of Psychology,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang 330022; 2.School of Humanities,Jiangxi Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics,Nanchang 330013)
关键词:
 分析性认知风格;  推理判断;  冲突探查
Keywords:
 analytic cognitive style;  reasoning;  conflict detection
分类号:
 B842.5
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 采用2䦆Wingdings 2MC@2䦆Wingdings 2MC@2混合设计和相关分析法,考察个体的分析性认知风格对其在完成有、无冲突的推理判断任务时的逻辑反应倾向和冲突探查过程的影响。结果表明分析性认知风格不会直接影响被试完成推理任务的逻辑反应倾向性,高、低分析性认知风格倾向组被试在逻辑反应正确率上不存在显著差异; 但对个体的冲突探查过程会有影响,高、低认知风格倾向组被试在反应自信率上存在显著差异,且冲突探查大小与分析性认知风格显著负相关,这一结果表明那些高分析性认知风格倾向的个体在完成冲突任务时,更可能探查到刻板反应与遵从逻辑规则做出的反应之间的冲突。
Abstract:
 The purpose of this paper is to investigate the individual differences in analytical cognitive style how to effect the logical response tendency and conflict detection in reasoning when reasoners complete reasoning and judgment tasks.ACS(analytic cognitive styles)measurement scale was used to measure the individual analytic cognitive style tendency,and the subjects are divided into high analytic cognitive style tendency group and low analytic cognitive style tendency group.we investigate the response accuracy,response time and response confidence rate of the two groups on the Base-rate neglect and Conjunction fallacy problems in conflict and non-conflict condition.The results showed the analytical cognitive style does not directly effect the logical response tendency of the subjects to complete reasoning tasks; but it has an impact on the conflict detection process of individual; Those peoples with high analytical cognitive style tend not to have obvious tendency of logical response,but they are more sensitive to conflicts and can detect the conflict between stereotypical responses and responses that followed logical rules.

参考文献/References

 
艾炎,胡竹菁.(2018a).推理判断中双重加工过程的协作与转换机制.心理科学进展,26(10),1794-1806.
艾炎,胡竹菁.(2018b).推理判断中偏差反应的加工机制:冲突探查失败,还是抑制失败?心理科学,41(4),869-875.
Bialek,M.,& Pennycook,G.(2017).The cognitive reflection test is robust to multiple exposures.Behavior Research Methods,1-7.
Cacioppo,J.T.,Petty,R.E.,Feinstein,J.,& Jarvis,W.(1996).Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation:The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition.Psychological Bulletin,119,197-253.
De Neys,W.(2012).Bias and conflict:A case for logical intuitions.Perspectives on Psychological Science,7(1),28-38.
De Neys,W.(2014).Conflict detection,dual processes,and logical intuitions:Some clarifications.Thinking & Reasoning,20(2),169-187.
De Neys,W.,Cromheeke,S.,& Osman,M.(2011).Biased but in doubt:Conflict and decision confidence.PloS One,6(1),e15954.
De Neys,W.,& Glumicic,T.(2008).Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking.Cognition,106(3),1248-1299.
Evans,J.S.(1984).Heuristic and analytic processes in reasoing.British Journal in Psychology,75(6),451-468.
Evans,J.S.B.T.(2010).Intuition and reasoning:A dual-process perspective.Psychological Inquiry,21(4),313-326.
Frey,D.,De Neys,W.,& Bago,B.(2016).The jury of intuition:Conflict detection and intuitive processing.Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition,5(3),335-337.
Kahneman,D.,& Tversky,A.(1973).On the psychology of prediction.Psychological Review,80(4),237-251.
Pennycook,G.,Cheyne,J.A.,Barr,N.,Koehler,D.J.,& Fugelsang,J.A.(2013).The role of analytic thinking in moral judgements and values.Thinking & Reasoning,20(2),188-214.
Pennycook,G.,Cheyne,J.A.,Barr,N.,Koehler,D.J.,& Fugelsang,J.A.(2014).Cognitive style and religiosity:The role of conflict detection.Memory & Cognition,42(1),1-10.
Pennycook,G.,Cheyne,J.A.,Seli,P.,Koehler,D.J.,& Fugelsang,J.A.(2012).Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief.Cognition,123(3),335-346.
Pennycook,G.,Fugelsang,J.A.,& Koehler,D.J.(2015).What makes us think?A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement.Cognition Psychology,80,34-72.
Toplak,M.E.,West,R.F.,& Stanovich,K.E.(2014).Rational thinking and cognitive sophistication:Development,cognitive abilities,and thinking dispositions.Developmental Psychology,50(4),1037.
Toplak,M.E.,West,R.F.,& Stanovich,K.E.(2017).Real-world correlates of performance on heuristics and biases tasks in a community sample.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,30(2),541-554.
Tversky,A.,& Kahneman,D.(1983).Extensional versus intuitive reasoning:The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.Psychological Review,90,293-315.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:全国教育科学规划教育部重点课题(DHA170341),国家自然科学基金项目(31460252)。 通讯作者:胡竹菁,E-mail:huzjing@jxnu.edu.cn。
更新日期/Last Update:  2019-12-30