我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 贝叶斯推理的三重加工心智模型(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2021年03期
页码:
 230-236
栏目:
 
出版日期:
 2021-08-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Tripartite Model of Mind on Bayesian Reasoning
文章编号:
1003-5184(2021)03-0230-07
作者:
 谢云天1; 2; 史滋福1
 (1.湖南师范大学心理学系,认知与人类行为湖南省重点实验室,长沙 410081; 2.长沙师范学院应用心理学教研室,长沙 410100)
Author(s):
 Xie Yuntian1; 2; Shi Zifu1
 (1.Department of Psychology,Hunan Normal University,Cognition and Human Behavior Key Laboratory of Hunan Province,Changsha 410081; 2.Department of Applied Psychology,Changsha Normal University,Changsha 410100)
关键词:
 贝叶斯推理;  客体因素;  主体因素;  三重加工心智模型
Keywords:
 Bayesian reasoning;  object factors;  subject factors;  Tripartite Model of Mind
分类号:
 B842.5
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 自二十世纪60年代Edwards首次用实验研究人类推理是否遵循贝叶斯规则以来,国内外贝叶斯推理研究取得了长足的发展,但也出现了一些困境:对影响贝叶斯推理的客体因素和主体因素研究未成体系,解释理论莫衷一是。未来的研究应该重新审视客体与主体的关系,系统整合和多角度分析影响贝叶斯推理的因素,尝试以三重加工心智模型解释人类贝叶斯推理行为,并对以往的解释理论进行融合,从而更好地揭示人类不确定性决策的本质。
Abstract:
 Since Edwards first used experiments to study whether human reasoning followed Bayesian rules in the 1960s,research on Bayesian reasoning has made great progress at home and abroad.However,there are some dilemmas.For example,there is no systematic research on the object factors and the subject factors that affect Bayesian reasoning,and there is no agreement on the interpretation theory.In order to better reveal the nature of human’s uncertain decision making,future research should re-examine the relationship between object factors and subject factors,analysis the influential factors from multiple perspectives,try to explain human Bayesian reasoning in terms of Tripartite Model of Mind,integrate explanatory theories.

参考文献/References

 黄琳妍,李虹,徐继红.(2013).直觉性和分析性决策策略偏好的情境效应.心理与行为研究,11(6),739-745.
李章吕,何向东.(2017).贝叶斯推理的认知困境及其消解.科学技术哲学研究,34(6),13-18.
斯坦诺维奇.(2015).超越智商:为什么聪明人也会做蠢事(张斌 译).北京:机械工业出版社.
史滋福,李波,龙超钥.(2018).明晰因果关系对贝叶斯推理的影响:批判性思维能力与数学能力的作用. 教育研究与实验,(1),88-91.
史滋福,李珍贵,李波,王诗宇.(2019).因果信息和提示指导语对大学生贝叶斯推理的影响.心理科学,42(5),1245-1250.
史滋福,廖紫祥,刘妹.(2015).基础比率和认知风格对贝叶斯推理影响的眼动研究.心理科学,38(5),1045-1050.
史滋福,刘妹,周禹希.(2012).大学生学习风格对贝叶斯推理成绩的影响.教育研究与实验,(1),94-96.
史滋福,龙超钥,谢贝.(2017).因果信息在贝叶斯推理中的作用:问题情境的调节.心理学探新,37(3),204-207.
史滋福,王诗宇,李波,李珍贵.(2020).证据信息和自我关联对贝叶斯推理的影响:基于等概率假设的视角.心理科学,43(4),984-989.
史滋福,王香香,陈姣,张庆林.(2010).贝叶斯推理研究的三个层次.心理科学进展,18(2),230-236.
史滋福,张庆林.(2009).贝叶斯推理的心理学研究.长春:吉林大学出版社.
史滋福,张庆林.(2011).“直觉调整差误”偏向对贝叶斯推理成绩的影响.心理科学,34(4),970-973.
史滋福,周禹希,刘妹.(2012).问题类型和情绪状态对贝叶斯推理的影响.心理科学,35(4),988-992.
唐源鸿,史滋福.(2011).贝叶斯推理中的“自击中率参照抑制”.心理科学,34(1),220-224.
杨莉,胡竹菁.(2010).贝叶斯推理中的情感启发式.心理学探新,30(3),18-21.
周丽清.(2016).成人期后形式思维的发展与机制(博士学位论文).华东师范大学,上海.
Afonso,J.C.,Fullea,J.,Griffin,W.L.,Yang,Y.,Jones,A.G.,Connolly,J.A.D.,et al.(2013).3D multiobservable probabilistic inversion for the compositional and thermal structure of the lithosphere and upper mantle.I:A priori petrological information and geophysical observables.Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth,118(5),2586-2617.
Asakura,N.,& Inui,T.(2016).A Bayesian framework for false belief reasoning in children:Arational integration of theory-theory and simulation theory.Frontiers in Psychology,7,2019.
Ayal,S.,& Beythmarom,R.(2014).The effects of mental steps and compatibility on Bayesian reasoning.Judgment and Decision Making,9(3),226-242.
Barash,J.,Brocas,I.,Carrillo,J.D.,& Kodaverdian,N.(2018).Heuristic to Bayesian:The evolution of reasoning from childhood to adulthood.Journal of Economic Behavior andOrganization,(5),1-18.
Brase,G.L.(2007).The(In)flexibility of evolved frequency representations for statistical reasoning:Cognitive styles and brief prompts do not influence Bayesian inference.Acta Psychologica Sinica,39(3),398-405.
Brase,G.L.,& Hill,W.T.(2015).Good fences make for good neighbors but bad science:Areview of what improves Bayesian reasoning and why.Frontiers in Psychology,6,340.
Brase,G.L.,& Hill,W.T.(2017).Adding up to good Bayesian reasoning:Problem format manipulations and individual skill differences.Journal of Experimental Psychology General,146(4),577-591.
Chiesi,F.,& Primi,C.(2014).The interplay among knowledge,cognitive abilities and thinking styles in probabilistic reasoning:A test of a model.In E.Chernoff & B.Sriraman(Eds.),Probabilistic thinking(pp.195-214).Berlin,Germany:Springer.
Cohen,A.L.,Sidlowski,S.,& Staub,A.(2017).Beliefs and Bayesian reasoning.Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,24,972-978.
Cohen,A.L.,& Staub,A.(2015).Within-subject consistency and between-subject variability in Bayesian reasoning strategies.Cognitive Psychology,81,26-47.
Cruz,N.,Baratgin,J.,Oaksford,M.,& Over,D.E.(2015).Bayesian reasoning with ifs and ands and ors.Frontiers in Psychology,6,192.
Domurat,A.,Kowalczuk,O.,Idzikowska,K.,Borzymowska,Z.,& Nowakprzygodzka,M.(2015).Bayesian probability estimates are not necessary to make choices satisfying Bayes’ rule in elementary situations.Frontiers in Psychology,6,1194.
Donoso,M.,Collins,A.G.,& Koechlin,E.(2014).Foundations of human reasoning in the prefrontal cortex.Science,344,1481-1486.
Garcia-Retamero,R.,Galesic,M.,& Gigerenzer,G.(2011).Improving comprehension and communication of risks about health.Psicothema,23(4),599-605.
Garcia-Retamero,R.,& Hoffrage,U.(2013).Visual representation of statistical information improves diagnostic inferences in doctors and their patients.Social Science and Medicine,83(1),27-33.
Goodwin,P.(2015).When simple alternatives to Bayes formula work well:Reducing the cognitive load when updating probability forecasts.Journal of Business Research,68(8),1686-1691.
Hayes,B.K.,Ngo,J.,Hawkins,G.E.,& Newell,B.R.(2018).Causal explanation improves judgment under uncertainty,but rarely in a Bayesian way.Memory and Cognition,46,112-131.
Hill,W.T.,& Brase,G.L.(2012).When and for whom do frequencies facilitate performance?On the role of numerical literacy.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,65(12),2343-2368.
Hoffrage,U.,Krauss,S.,Martignon,L.,& Gigerenzer,G.(2015).Natural frequencies improve Bayesian reasoning in simple and complex inference tasks.Frontiers in Psychology,6,1473.
Johnson,E.D.,& Tubau,E.(2015).Comprehension and computation in Bayesian problem solving.Frontiers in Psychology,6,938.
Kopp,B.,Seer,C.,Lange,F.,Kluytmans,A.,Kolossa,A.,Fingscheidt,T.,et al.(2016).P300 amplitude variations,prior probabilities,and likelihoods:A Bayesian ERP study.Cognitive,Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience,16(5),911-928.
Krynski,T.R.,& Tenenbaum,J.B.(2007).The role of causality in judgment under uncertainty.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,136(3),430-450.
Lesage,E.,Navarrete,G.,& De Neys,W.(2013).Evolutionary modules and Bayesian facilitation:The role of general cognitive resources.Thinking and Reasoning,19(1),27-53.
McNair,S.J.(2015).Beyond the status-quo:Research on Bayesian reasoning must develop in both theory and method.Frontiers in Psychology,6,97.
McNair,S.J.,& Feeney,A.(2014).When does information about causal structure improve statistical reasoning?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,67(4),625-645.
McNair,S.J.,& Feeney,A.(2015).Whose statistical reasoning is facilitated by a causal structure intervention.Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,22(1),258-264.
Navarrete,G.,Correia,R.,Sirota,M.,Juanchich,M.,& Huepe,D.(2015).Doctor,what does my positive test mean from Bayesian textbook tasks to personalized risk communication.Frontiers in Psychology,6,1327.
Ottley,A.,Peck,E.,Harrison,L.,Afergan,D.,Ziemkiewicz,C.,Taylor,H.,et al.(2016).Improving Bayesian reasoning the effects of phrasing,visualization,and spatial ability.IEEE Transactions on Visualizationand Computer Graphics,22(1),529-538.
Reani,M.,Davies,A.,Peek,N.,& Jay,C.(2018).How do people use information presentation to make decisions in Bayesian reasoning tasks?International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,111,62-77.
Seer,C.,Lange,F.,Boos,M.,Dengler,R.,& Kopp,B.(2016).Prior probabilities modulate cortical surprise responses:A study of event-related potentials.Brain and Cognition,106,78-89.
Shi,Z.F.,Yin,L.,Dong,J.,Ma,X.,& Li,B.(2019).Effect of probability information on Bayesian reasoning:A study of event-related potentials.Frontiers in Psychology,10,1106.
Sirota,M.,Kostovicˇová,L.,& Juanchich,M.(2014).The effect of iconicity of visual displays on statistical reasoning:Evidence in favor of the null hypothesis.Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,21(4),961-968.
Stanovich,K.E.(2018).Miserliness in human cognition:The interaction of detection,override,and mindware.Thinking and Reasoning,24(4),423-444.
Stanoich,K.E.,Toplak,M.E.,& West,R.F.(2008).The development of rational thought:A taxonomy of heuristics and biases.Advances in Child Development and Behavior,36,251-285.
Stanovich,K.E.,West,R.F.,& Toplak,M.E.(2011).The complexity of developmental predictions from dual process models.Developmental Review,31,103-118.
Stock,R.,Fisk,J.E.,& Montgomery,C.(2016).Measures of Bayesian reasoning performance on ‘normal’ and ‘natural’ frequency tasks.The Journal of General Psychology,143(3),185-214.
Tappin,B.M.,& Gadsby,S.(2019).Biased belief in the Bayesian brain:A deeper look at the evidence.Consciousness and Cognition,68,107-114.
Tversky,A.,& Kahneman,D.J.(1974).Judgment under uncertainty:Heuristics and biases.Science,185,1124-1131.
Vilares,I.,& Kording,K.(2011).Bayesian models:The structure of the world,uncertainty,behavior,and the brain.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,1224(1),22-39.
Yin,L.,Shi,Z.,Liao,Z.,Tang,T.,Xie,Y.,& Peng,S.(2020).The effects of working memory and probability format on Bayesian reasoning.Frontiers in Psychology,11,863.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:国家社会科学基金教育学一般课题“青少年概率推理的发展特点及其机制研究:基于‘三重加工心智’模型”(BBA160044)。
通讯作者:史滋福,E-mail:shizf@hunnu.edu.cn。
更新日期/Last Update:  1900-01-01