我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 任务无关积极情绪与时间限制对大学生风险决策的影响(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2008年28卷01期
页码:
 55
栏目:
 认知与学校心理学
出版日期:
 2008-03-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
 The Interaction of Anticipatory Emotions and The Time Constraint to the Risk Decision Making
作者:
 王 沛1; 康 琳2
 1．上海师范大学教育学院，上海200234；2．宁波大学教育学院，宁波315211
Author(s):
 Wang Pei 1; Kang Li n2
 1．College of Education Science ，Shanghai Normal University，Shanghai 200234；2．College of Education Science ，Ningbo University，Ningbo 315211
关键词:
 风险决策; 认知; 情绪; 时间限制; 大学生
Keywords:
 the risk decision making ; cognition; emotion; the ti me restrict ; college students
分类号:
 B842.5
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 利用日常生活决策任务，探讨了任务无关积极情绪和预支情绪与时间限制对风险决策的交互影响。研究结果表明：对于强调损失可能且意义重大的职业决策，积极情绪使个体表现出风险回避倾向，而时间限制通过影响个体的决策策略增强情绪状态对决策的影响作用。在无重大意义无损失可能的决策情境中，时间限制能降低个体的冒险倾向，而积极情绪通过促使个体夸大时间限制造成的压力，增强时间限制对风险决策的影响。
Abstract:
 Takenthe dailylife of college students as the experi mental task，this experi ment triedto explore the interaction of anticipatory emo—tions and the ti me restrict to the risk decision making ．The results ofthe research showed ：In occupational decisions which are meaningful butinsist onthe possibilities oflosses ，positive moods make the individuals avoid risks ，while the ti me restrict strengthenthe i mpacts of emotions byinfluencingthe strategies ofindividual’s decision．Inthe decision making of application of scholarship ，ti me restrict can reduce individuals’risktaking ，while positive moods strengthenthe influence ofti me restrict to risk decision making bythe pressure ，whichis forced bythe indi—viduals’aggrandizement ofti me restrict ，making the individuals’be cautious to the decision making in the decision making of no i mportanceand possibilities oflosses

参考文献/References

 1 Nygren TE，Isen A M，Taylor PJ，et al ．．The influence of posi—tive affect on the decision rule in risk situations ：focus on out—come （and especially avoidance of loss）rather than probabili—ty ．Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes ，1996，66（1）：59－72．
2 Nygren TE．Reacting to perceived high －and low－risk win －lose opportunities in arisk decisiono －makingtask：is it framingor affect or both？Motivation and Emotion，1998，22（1）：73－90．
3 Maule AJ，Robert G，HockeyJ，et al ．．Effects ofti me －pressureon decision －making under uncertainty：changes in affectivestate and information processing strategy．Acta Psychologica，2000，104（3）：283－301．
4 Ordo′n~ez L，Benson LIII ．Decisions under ti me pressure ：howti me constraint affects risky decision －making ．OrganizationalBehavior and Human Decision Processes ，1997，71（2）：121－140．
5 Edland AC．Ti me pressure andthe application of decisionrules ．Scandinavian Journal of Psychology，1997，35：281－291．
6 Benson LIII ，Beach L．The effects ofti me constraints onthe pre－choice screening of decision options ．Organizational Behaviorand Human Decision Processes ，1996，67：222－228．
7 Shiv B，Fedorikhin A．Heart and mindin conflict ：the interplay ofaffect and congnition in consumer decision making ．Journal ofConsumer Research，1999，26（3）：278－292．

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 -
更新日期/Last Update:  2009-01-16